Paul D Ziegler1, John D Rogers2, Scott W Ferreira3, Allan J Nichols4, Mark Richards5, Jodi L Koehler6, Shantanu Sarkar6. 1. Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm Heart Failure, Mounds View, MN, United States. Electronic address: paul.david.ziegler@medtronic.com. 2. Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, CA, United States. 3. St. Louis University, St. Louis, MO, United States. 4. OhioHealth Heart & Vascular Physicians, Columbus, OH, United States. 5. ProMedica Physicians Cardiology, Toledo, OH, United States. 6. Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm Heart Failure, Mounds View, MN, United States.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The long-term incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in cryptogenic stroke (CS) patients has been explored in carefully controlled clinical trials but real-world data are limited. We investigated the two-year incidence of AF in real-world clinical practice among a large cohort of patients with an insertable cardiac monitor (ICM) placed for AF detection following CS. METHODS: Patients in the de-identified Medtronic Discovery™ Link database who received an ICM (Reveal LINQ™) for the purpose of AF detection following CS were included and monitored for up to 2years. All detected AF episodes (≥2min) were adjudicated. We quantified the AF detection rate using Kaplan-Meier survival estimates, analyzed the median time to initial detection of AF, and simulated the ability of various intermittent monitoring strategies to detect AF. RESULTS: A total of 1247 patients (65.3±13.0years, 53% male) were included and followed for 579±222days. AF episodes (n=4183) were detected in 238 patients, resulting in an AF detection rate of 21.5% at 2years. The median time to AF detection was 112 [IQR 35-293] days. Intermittent monitoring for AF detection was inferior to continuous ICM monitoring with sensitivities ranging from 2.9% (annual 24-hour Holter) to 29.9% (quarterly 7-day Holters), p<0.001. CONCLUSIONS: AF episodes were detected via continuous monitoring with ICMs in approximately 1 of every 5 CS patients within 2years of follow-up. The vast majority of patients with AF would not have been detected with conventional external ambulatory monitors. ICMs should therefore be considered in the evaluation of CS patients.
BACKGROUND: The long-term incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in cryptogenic stroke (CS) patients has been explored in carefully controlled clinical trials but real-world data are limited. We investigated the two-year incidence of AF in real-world clinical practice among a large cohort of patients with an insertable cardiac monitor (ICM) placed for AF detection following CS. METHODS:Patients in the de-identified Medtronic Discovery™ Link database who received an ICM (Reveal LINQ™) for the purpose of AF detection following CS were included and monitored for up to 2years. All detected AF episodes (≥2min) were adjudicated. We quantified the AF detection rate using Kaplan-Meier survival estimates, analyzed the median time to initial detection of AF, and simulated the ability of various intermittent monitoring strategies to detect AF. RESULTS: A total of 1247 patients (65.3±13.0years, 53% male) were included and followed for 579±222days. AF episodes (n=4183) were detected in 238 patients, resulting in an AF detection rate of 21.5% at 2years. The median time to AF detection was 112 [IQR 35-293] days. Intermittent monitoring for AF detection was inferior to continuous ICM monitoring with sensitivities ranging from 2.9% (annual 24-hour Holter) to 29.9% (quarterly 7-day Holters), p<0.001. CONCLUSIONS:AF episodes were detected via continuous monitoring with ICMs in approximately 1 of every 5 CSpatients within 2years of follow-up. The vast majority of patients with AF would not have been detected with conventional external ambulatory monitors. ICMs should therefore be considered in the evaluation of CSpatients.
Authors: Markus Kneihsl; Egbert Bisping; Daniel Scherr; Harald Mangge; Simon Fandler-Höfler; Isabella Colonna; Melanie Haidegger; Sebastian Eppinger; Edith Hofer; Franz Fazekas; Christian Enzinger; Thomas Gattringer Journal: Eur J Neurol Date: 2021-09-23 Impact factor: 6.288
Authors: Shadi Yaghi; Michael P Ryan; Candace L Gunnarsson; William Irish; Sarah C Rosemas; Karah Neisen; Paul D Ziegler; Matthew R Reynolds Journal: Heart Rhythm O2 Date: 2022-02-13
Authors: Barbara Ratajczak-Tretel; Anna Tancin Lambert; Henriette Johansen; Bente Halvorsen; Vigdis Bjerkeli; David Russell; Else Charlotte Sandset; Hege Ihle-Hansen; Erik Eriksen; Halvor Næss; Vojtech Novotny; Andrej Netland Khanevski; Thomas C Truelsen; Titto Idicula; Karen L Ægidius; Håkon Tobro; Siv B Krogseth; Håkon Ihle-Hansen; Guri Hagberg; Christina Kruuse; Kathrine Arntzen; Grete K Bakkejord; Maja Villseth; Ingvild Nakstad; Guttorm Eldøen; Raheel Shafiq; Anne Gulsvik; Martin Kurz; Mehdi Rezai; Jesper Sømark; Stein-Helge Tingvoll; Christine Jonassen; Susanne Ingebrigtsen; Linn Hofsøy Steffensen; Christine Kremer; Dan Atar; Anne Hege Aamodt Journal: Eur Stroke J Date: 2019-03-19
Authors: Lan Gao; Marj Moodie; Ben Freedman; Christina Lam; Hans Tu; Corey Swift; Sze-Ho Ma; Vincent C T Mok; Yi Sui; David Sharpe; Darshan Ghia; Jim Jannes; Stephen Davis; Xinfeng Liu; Bernard Yan Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2022-04-12 Impact factor: 6.106
Authors: Alper Öner; Thomas Lips; Uwe Walter; Alexander Storch; Hüseyin Ince; Evren Caglayan; Seyrani Yücel; Jasmin Ortak; Christian Schmidt Journal: Eur J Med Res Date: 2020-06-29 Impact factor: 2.175