Barbara Ratajczak-Tretel1,2, Anna Tancin Lambert1,2, Henriette Johansen3, Bente Halvorsen4,2, Vigdis Bjerkeli4, David Russell3,2, Else Charlotte Sandset3, Hege Ihle-Hansen5, Erik Eriksen3, Halvor Næss6, Vojtech Novotny6, Andrej Netland Khanevski6, Thomas C Truelsen7, Titto Idicula8, Karen L Ægidius9, Håkon Tobro10, Siv B Krogseth11, Håkon Ihle-Hansen12, Guri Hagberg12, Christina Kruuse13, Kathrine Arntzen14, Grete K Bakkejord14, Maja Villseth15, Ingvild Nakstad15, Guttorm Eldøen16, Raheel Shafiq16, Anne Gulsvik17, Martin Kurz18, Mehdi Rezai18, Jesper Sømark19, Stein-Helge Tingvoll19, Christine Jonassen20,21, Susanne Ingebrigtsen22, Linn Hofsøy Steffensen22, Christine Kremer23,24, Dan Atar2,25, Anne Hege Aamodt3. 1. Department of Neurology, Østfold Hospital Trust, Grålum, Norway. 2. Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. 3. Department of Neurology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. 4. Research Institute of Internal Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. 5. Department of Geriatric Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. 6. Department of Neurology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway. 7. Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark. 8. Department of Neurology, St. Olav University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway. 9. Department of Neurology, Bispebjerg University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark. 10. Department of Neurology, Telemark Hospital, Skien, Norway. 11. Department of Neurology, Vestfold Hospital, Tønsberg, Norway. 12. Department of Internal Medicine, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Bærum Hospital, Bærum, Norway. 13. Department of Neurology, Herlev Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark. 14. Department of Neurology, Nordlandssykehuset, Bodø, Norway. 15. Department of Neurology, Drammen Hospital, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Drammen, Norway. 16. Department of Neurology, Molde Hospital, Molde, Norway. 17. Department of Internal Medicine, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway. 18. Department of Neurology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway. 19. Department of Neurology, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Lillehammer, Norway. 20. Center of Laboratory Medicine, Østfold Hospital Trust, Grålum, Norway. 21. Department of Chemistry, Biotechnology and Food Science, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway. 22. Department of Neurology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway. 23. Department of Neurology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden. 24. Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden. 25. Department of Cardiology B, Oslo University Hospital, Ullevål, Oslo, Norway.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation is often suspected as a probable cause of cryptogenic stroke. Continuous long-term ECG monitoring using insertable cardiac monitors is a clinically effective technique to screen for atrial fibrillation and superior to conventional follow-up in cryptogenic stroke. However, more studies are needed to identify factors which can help selecting patients with the highest possibility of detecting atrial fibrillation with prolonged rhythm monitoring. The clinical relevance of short-term atrial fibrillation, the need for medical intervention and the evaluation as to whether intervention results in improved clinical outcomes should be assessed. METHOD: The Nordic Atrial Fibrillation and Stroke Study is an international, multicentre, prospective, observational trial evaluating the occurrence of occult atrial fibrillation in cryptogenic stroke and transient ischaemic attack. Patients with cryptogenic stroke or transient ischaemic attack from the Nordic countries are included and will have the Reveal LINQ® Insertable cardiac monitor system implanted for 12 months for atrial fibrillation detection. Biomarkers which can be used as predictors for atrial fibrillation and may identify patients, who could derive the most clinical benefit from the detection of atrial fibrillation by prolonged monitoring, are being studied. CONCLUSION: The primary endpoint is atrial fibrillation burden within 12 months of continuous rhythm monitoring. Secondary endpoints are atrial fibrillation burden within six months, levels of biomarkers predicting atrial fibrillation, CHA2DS2-VASc score, incidence of recurrent stroke or transient ischaemic attack, use of anticoagulation and antiarrhythmic drugs, and quality of life measurements. The clinical follow-up period is 12 months. The study started in 2017 and the completion is expected at the end of 2020.
PURPOSE: Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation is often suspected as a probable cause of cryptogenic stroke. Continuous long-term ECG monitoring using insertable cardiac monitors is a clinically effective technique to screen for atrial fibrillation and superior to conventional follow-up in cryptogenic stroke. However, more studies are needed to identify factors which can help selecting patients with the highest possibility of detecting atrial fibrillation with prolonged rhythm monitoring. The clinical relevance of short-term atrial fibrillation, the need for medical intervention and the evaluation as to whether intervention results in improved clinical outcomes should be assessed. METHOD: The Nordic Atrial Fibrillation and Stroke Study is an international, multicentre, prospective, observational trial evaluating the occurrence of occult atrial fibrillation in cryptogenic stroke and transient ischaemic attack. Patients with cryptogenic stroke or transient ischaemic attack from the Nordic countries are included and will have the Reveal LINQ® Insertable cardiac monitor system implanted for 12 months for atrial fibrillation detection. Biomarkers which can be used as predictors for atrial fibrillation and may identify patients, who could derive the most clinical benefit from the detection of atrial fibrillation by prolonged monitoring, are being studied. CONCLUSION: The primary endpoint is atrial fibrillation burden within 12 months of continuous rhythm monitoring. Secondary endpoints are atrial fibrillation burden within six months, levels of biomarkers predicting atrial fibrillation, CHA2DS2-VASc score, incidence of recurrent stroke or transient ischaemic attack, use of anticoagulation and antiarrhythmic drugs, and quality of life measurements. The clinical follow-up period is 12 months. The study started in 2017 and the completion is expected at the end of 2020.
Authors: E Santamarina; A Penalba; T García-Berrocoso; P Delgado; M Quintana; T González-Alujas; M Ribó; O Maisterra; C A Molina; A Evangelista; J Alvarez-Sabín; J Montaner Journal: J Neurol Date: 2012-05-17 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Tommaso Sanna; Hans-Christoph Diener; Rod S Passman; Vincenzo Di Lazzaro; Richard A Bernstein; Carlos A Morillo; Marilyn Mollman Rymer; Vincent Thijs; Tyson Rogers; Frank Beckers; Kate Lindborg; Johannes Brachmann Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-06-26 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ana Catarina Fonseca; Dulce Brito; Teresa Pinho e Melo; Ruth Geraldes; Patrícia Canhão; Louis R Caplan; José M Ferro Journal: Int J Stroke Date: 2013-08-26 Impact factor: 5.266
Authors: L M Christensen; D W Krieger; S Højberg; O D Pedersen; F M Karlsen; M D Jacobsen; R Worck; H Nielsen; K Aegidius; L L Jeppesen; S Rosenbaum; J Marstrand; H Christensen Journal: Eur J Neurol Date: 2014-03-15 Impact factor: 6.089
Authors: Carlo Mannina; Zhezhen Jin; Kenji Matsumoto; Kazato Ito; Angelo Biviano; Mitchell S V Elkind; Tatjana Rundek; Shunichi Homma; Ralph L Sacco; Marco R Di Tullio Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2021-05-06 Impact factor: 4.039