Yue Lu1, Shan-Shan Diao1, Shuang-Jiao Huang1, Jie-Ji Zhao1, Meng-Fan Ye1, Fei-Rong Yao2, Yan Kong3, Zhuan Xu4. 1. Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, No. 899, Pinghai Road, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China. 2. Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, No. 899, Pinghai Road, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China. 3. Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, No. 899, Pinghai Road, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China. kong0919@163.com. 4. Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, No. 899, Pinghai Road, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China. xuzhuan772@126.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In recent years, the implantable cardiac monitors (ICM) have enhanced the recognition ability of atrial fibrillation (AF), which makes ICM have a new application in AF detection. We conducted a meta-analysis to determine the total incidence of newly found AF detected by ICM after cryptogenic stroke and to evaluate the factors related to the detection of AF. METHODS: A literature search was conducted in the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane library databases until March 1, 2020. Studies that reported the detection rate of AF using ICM in cryptogenic stroke patients with negative initial AF screening were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 23 studies were included. The overall proportion of AF detected by ICM in cryptogenic stroke patients was 25% (95% confidence interval [CI], 22-29%). The rate of AF detected by ICM was independently related to both cardiac monitoring time (coefficient = 0.0003; 95% CI, 0.0001-0.0005; P = 0.0001) and CHA2DS2-VASc score (coefficient = 0.0834; 95% CI, 0.0339-0.1329; P = 0.001). In subgroup analysis, we found a significant difference in the detection rate of AF for monitoring duration (< 6 months: 9.6% [95% CI, 4.4-16.4%]; ≥ 6 and ≤ 12 months: 19.3% [95% CI, 15.9-23.0%]; > 12 and ≤ 24 months: 23.6% [95% CI, 19.9-27.5%]; > 24 months and ≤ 36 months: 36.5% [95% CI, 24.2-49.9%]; P < 0.001), and continent (Europe: 26.5% [95% CI, 22.2-31.0%]; North America: 16.0% [95% CI, 10.3-22.6%]; Asia: 17.4% [95% CI, 12.4-23.0%]; P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The longer the time of ICM monitoring after cryptogenic stroke, the higher the detection rate of AF. Further research is still needed to determine the optimal duration of long-term cardiac monitoring.
BACKGROUND: In recent years, the implantable cardiac monitors (ICM) have enhanced the recognition ability of atrial fibrillation (AF), which makes ICM have a new application in AF detection. We conducted a meta-analysis to determine the total incidence of newly found AF detected by ICM after cryptogenic stroke and to evaluate the factors related to the detection of AF. METHODS: A literature search was conducted in the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane library databases until March 1, 2020. Studies that reported the detection rate of AF using ICM in cryptogenic strokepatients with negative initial AF screening were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 23 studies were included. The overall proportion of AF detected by ICM in cryptogenic strokepatients was 25% (95% confidence interval [CI], 22-29%). The rate of AF detected by ICM was independently related to both cardiac monitoring time (coefficient = 0.0003; 95% CI, 0.0001-0.0005; P = 0.0001) and CHA2DS2-VASc score (coefficient = 0.0834; 95% CI, 0.0339-0.1329; P = 0.001). In subgroup analysis, we found a significant difference in the detection rate of AF for monitoring duration (< 6 months: 9.6% [95% CI, 4.4-16.4%]; ≥ 6 and ≤ 12 months: 19.3% [95% CI, 15.9-23.0%]; > 12 and ≤ 24 months: 23.6% [95% CI, 19.9-27.5%]; > 24 months and ≤ 36 months: 36.5% [95% CI, 24.2-49.9%]; P < 0.001), and continent (Europe: 26.5% [95% CI, 22.2-31.0%]; North America: 16.0% [95% CI, 10.3-22.6%]; Asia: 17.4% [95% CI, 12.4-23.0%]; P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The longer the time of ICM monitoring after cryptogenic stroke, the higher the detection rate of AF. Further research is still needed to determine the optimal duration of long-term cardiac monitoring.
Authors: Jeff S Healey; Stuart J Connolly; Michael R Gold; Carsten W Israel; Isabelle C Van Gelder; Alessandro Capucci; C P Lau; Eric Fain; Sean Yang; Christophe Bailleul; Carlos A Morillo; Mark Carlson; Ellison Themeles; Elizabeth S Kaufman; Stefan H Hohnloser Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-01-12 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: S Adam Strickberger; John Ip; Sanjeev Saksena; Ken Curry; Tristram D Bahnson; Paul D Ziegler Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Teresa S M Tsang; George W Petty; Marion E Barnes; W Michael O'Fallon; Kent R Bailey; David O Wiebers; JoRean D Sicks; Teresa J H Christianson; James B Seward; Bernard J Gersh Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2003-07-02 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Tommaso Sanna; Hans-Christoph Diener; Rod S Passman; Vincenzo Di Lazzaro; Richard A Bernstein; Carlos A Morillo; Marilyn Mollman Rymer; Vincent Thijs; Tyson Rogers; Frank Beckers; Kate Lindborg; Johannes Brachmann Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-06-26 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Robert G Hart; Hans-Christoph Diener; Shelagh B Coutts; J Donald Easton; Christopher B Granger; Martin J O'Donnell; Ralph L Sacco; Stuart J Connolly Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 44.182