Literature DB >> 28623461

Neuropsychological Test Administration by Videoconference: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Timothy W Brearly1,2,3, Robert D Shura4,5,6, Sarah L Martindale4,5,6, Rory A Lazowski7, David D Luxton8, Brian V Shenal9,10, Jared A Rowland4,6,11,12.   

Abstract

The purpose of the current systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the effect of videoconference administration on adult neurocognitive tests. We investigated whether the scores acquired during a videoconference administration were different from those acquired during on-site administration. Relevant counterbalanced crossover studies were identified according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Twelve studies met criteria for analysis. Included samples consisted of healthy adults as well as those with psychiatric or neurocognitive disorders, with mean ages ranging from 34 to 88 years. Heterogenous data precluded the interpretation of a summary effect for videoconference administration. Studies including particpants with a mean age of 65-75, as well as studies that utilized a high speed network connection, indicated consistent performance across videoconference and on-site conditions, however studies with older participants and slower connections were more variable. Subgroup analyses indicated that videoconference scores for untimed tasks and those allowing for repetition fell 1/10th of a standard deviation below on-site scores. Test specific analyses indicated that verbally-mediated tasks including digit span, verbal fluency, and list learning were not affected by videoconference administration. Scores for the Boston Naming Test fell 1/10th of a standard deviation below on-site scores. Heterogenous data precluded meaningful interpretation of tasks with a motor component. The administration of verbally-mediated tasks by qualified professionals using existing norms was supported, and the use of visually-dependent tasks may also be considered. Variability in previous studies indicates a need for further investigation of motor-dependent tasks. We recommend the development of clinical best practices for conducting neuropsychological assessments via videoconference, and advocate for reimbursement structures that allow consumers to benefit from the increased access, convenience, and cost-savings that remote assessment provides.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assessment; Mhealth; Telehealth; Telemedicine; Teleneuropsychology; Telepsychology

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28623461     DOI: 10.1007/s11065-017-9349-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev        ISSN: 1040-7308            Impact factor:   7.444


  47 in total

1.  Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Julian P T Higgins; Simon G Thompson
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 2.  Initial practice recommendations for teleneuropsychology.

Authors:  Maria C Grosch; Michael C Gottlieb; C Munro Cullum
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 3.535

Review 3.  Videoconferencing psychotherapy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Autumn Backhaus; Zia Agha; Melissa L Maglione; Andrea Repp; Bridgett Ross; Danielle Zuest; Natalie M Rice-Thorp; James Lohr; Steven R Thorp
Journal:  Psychol Serv       Date:  2012-05

4.  Video Teleconference Administration of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status.

Authors:  Jeanine M Galusha-Glasscock; Daniel K Horton; Myron F Weiner; C Munro Cullum
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 2.813

Review 5.  Can Teleneuropsychology Help Meet the Neuropsychological Needs of Western Africans? The Case of Ghana.

Authors:  Samuel Adjorlolo
Journal:  Appl Neuropsychol Adult       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 2.248

Review 6.  Advantages and limitations of teleneurology.

Authors:  Lawrence R Wechsler
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 18.302

7.  Real-time teleophthalmology in rural Western Australia.

Authors:  Karim A Johnson; Joos Meyer; Seyhan Yazar; Angus W Turner
Journal:  Aust J Rural Health       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 1.662

8.  Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias.

Authors:  C B Begg; M Mazumdar
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 9.  Critical care telemedicine: evolution and state of the art.

Authors:  Craig M Lilly; Marc T Zubrow; Kenneth M Kempner; H Neal Reynolds; Sanjay Subramanian; Evert A Eriksson; Crystal L Jenkins; Teresa A Rincon; Benjamin A Kohl; Robert H Groves; Elizabeth R Cowboy; Kamana E Mbekeani; Mark J McDonald; Dominick A Rascona; Michael H Ries; Herbert J Rogove; Ahmed E Badr; Isabelle C Kopec
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 7.598

10.  A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael Borenstein; Larry V Hedges; Julian P T Higgins; Hannah R Rothstein
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2010-11-21       Impact factor: 5.273

View more
  60 in total

Review 1.  Assessing Cognition Outside of the Clinic: Smartphones and Sensors for Cognitive Assessment Across Diverse Psychiatric Disorders.

Authors:  Ryan Hays; Philip Henson; Hannah Wisniewski; Victoria Hendel; Aditya Vaidyam; John Torous
Journal:  Psychiatr Clin North Am       Date:  2019-09-25

Review 2.  Pediatric neuropsychological evaluation via telehealth: Novel models of care.

Authors:  Alison E Pritchard; Kristie Sweeney; Cynthia F Salorio; Lisa A Jacobson
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 3.535

3.  In-Home Video Telehealth for Dementia Management: Implications for Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Megan E Gately; Scott A Trudeau; Lauren R Moo
Journal:  Curr Geriatr Rep       Date:  2019-09-01

4.  Construct validity, ecological validity and acceptance of self-administered online neuropsychological assessment in adults.

Authors:  Naomi S Chaytor; Celestina Barbosa-Leiker; Laura T Germine; Luciana Mascarenhas Fonseca; Sterling M McPherson; Katherine R Tuttle
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 3.535

5.  Remote Assessment of Verbal Memory in Youth With Cochlear Implants During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  William G Kronenberger; Caitlin J Montgomery; Shirley C Henning; Allison Ditmars; Courtney A Johnson; Carolyn J Herbert; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 2.408

6.  Neuropsychologists' practice adjustments: The impact of COVID-19.

Authors:  Katherine L Zane; Nicholas S Thaler; Shannon E Reilly; James J Mahoney; David M Scarisbrick
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 3.535

7.  Telemedicine: A valuable tool in neurodegenerative diseases.

Authors:  Jamie L Adams; Taylor L Myers; Emma M Waddell; Kelsey L Spear; Ruth B Schneider
Journal:  Curr Geriatr Rep       Date:  2020-03-14

8.  Initial investigation of test-retest reliability of home-to-home teleneuropsychological assessment in healthy, English-speaking adults.

Authors:  Joshua T Fox-Fuller; Julie Ngo; Celina F Pluim; Rini I Kaplan; Dong-Ho Kim; Juliana A U Anzai; Defne Yucebas; Soibifaa M Briggs; Paula A Aduen; Alice Cronin-Golomb; Yakeel T Quiroz
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 3.535

9.  Validity of teleneuropsychology for older adults in response to COVID-19: A systematic and critical review.

Authors:  David E Marra; Kristin M Hamlet; Russell M Bauer; Dawn Bowers
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 3.535

10.  A Teleneuropsychology Protocol for the Cognitive Assessment of Older Adults During COVID-19.

Authors:  Marcela Kitaigorodsky; David Loewenstein; Rosie Curiel Cid; Elizabeth Crocco; Katherine Gorman; Christian González-Jiménez
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-05-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.