Karim A Johnson1, Joos Meyer1, Seyhan Yazar1, Angus W Turner1. 1. Centre for Ophthalmology & Visual Science (incorporating the Lions Eye Institute), The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the current utilisation of a real-time teleophthalmology service for rural Western Australia (WA). DESIGN: Service evaluation by prospective audit. SETTING: Includes general practices, optometrists, hospitals in rural WA and the Lions Eye Institute in Perth. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-five patients from rural WA participating. INTERVENTIONS: Video consultation (VC) with a general ophthalmologist. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of referring practitioners and their locations, software and imaging equipment used as well as the presentation, working diagnosis and follow-up plan for each consultation. RESULTS: Eighty-five participants took part in a total of 100 VCs in the 5-month data collection period. There were 49 men (58%); age range 7-92 years; 31 identified as Indigenous Australian (37%). Participants were referred by optometrists (59%), hospital district medical officers (23%) and GPs (18%). Karratha (41%), Albany (20%) and Broome (14%) were the main VC locations. There were 31 different eye conditions managed; red eye, acute vision loss, known glaucoma and abnormal retinal photographs were the main presentations. Skype was the commonly used software (71%). Images were provided in 63% of all VCs. The main equipment used included digital retinal cameras (56%), smartphones (25%) and digital slit lamps (13%). An outpatient appointment with the ophthalmologist was recommended following 35 VCs. CONCLUSIONS: Optometrists used this service most frequently, despite a lack of financial incentive. Digital retinal cameras and smartphones were the most commonly used imaging modalities. Overall, real-time teleophthalmology was used in the management of a broad range of eye conditions and was a useful supplement to outreach ophthalmology services.
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the current utilisation of a real-time teleophthalmology service for rural Western Australia (WA). DESIGN: Service evaluation by prospective audit. SETTING: Includes general practices, optometrists, hospitals in rural WA and the Lions Eye Institute in Perth. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-five patients from rural WA participating. INTERVENTIONS: Video consultation (VC) with a general ophthalmologist. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of referring practitioners and their locations, software and imaging equipment used as well as the presentation, working diagnosis and follow-up plan for each consultation. RESULTS: Eighty-five participants took part in a total of 100 VCs in the 5-month data collection period. There were 49 men (58%); age range 7-92 years; 31 identified as Indigenous Australian (37%). Participants were referred by optometrists (59%), hospital district medical officers (23%) and GPs (18%). Karratha (41%), Albany (20%) and Broome (14%) were the main VC locations. There were 31 different eye conditions managed; red eye, acute vision loss, known glaucoma and abnormal retinal photographs were the main presentations. Skype was the commonly used software (71%). Images were provided in 63% of all VCs. The main equipment used included digital retinal cameras (56%), smartphones (25%) and digital slit lamps (13%). An outpatient appointment with the ophthalmologist was recommended following 35 VCs. CONCLUSIONS: Optometrists used this service most frequently, despite a lack of financial incentive. Digital retinal cameras and smartphones were the most commonly used imaging modalities. Overall, real-time teleophthalmology was used in the management of a broad range of eye conditions and was a useful supplement to outreach ophthalmology services.
Authors: Timothy W Brearly; Robert D Shura; Sarah L Martindale; Rory A Lazowski; David D Luxton; Brian V Shenal; Jared A Rowland Journal: Neuropsychol Rev Date: 2017-06-16 Impact factor: 7.444
Authors: Flora Tzelepis; Christine L Paul; Christopher M Williams; Conor Gilligan; Tim Regan; Justine Daly; Rebecca K Hodder; Emma Byrnes; Judith Byaruhanga; Tameka McFadyen; John Wiggers Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2019-10-29
Authors: Carolina C S Valentim; Justin C Muste; Amogh I Iyer; Michael A Krause; Aneesha Kalur; Steve W Gendi; Marc Ohlhausen; Aleksandra Rachitskaya; Rishi P Singh; Katherine E Talcott Journal: Eye (Lond) Date: 2022-01-28 Impact factor: 3.775
Authors: Ryan S Meshkin; Grayson W Armstrong; Nathan E Hall; Elizabeth J Rossin; Maggie B Hymowitz; Alice C Lorch Journal: Eye (Lond) Date: 2022-01-26 Impact factor: 4.456
Authors: Gagan Kalra; Andrew M Williams; Patrick W Commiskey; Eve M R Bowers; Tadhg Schempf; José-Alain Sahel; Evan L Waxman; Roxana Fu Journal: Ophthalmol Ther Date: 2020-06-13