Literature DB >> 34311660

Initial investigation of test-retest reliability of home-to-home teleneuropsychological assessment in healthy, English-speaking adults.

Joshua T Fox-Fuller1,2, Julie Ngo1, Celina F Pluim1,2, Rini I Kaplan1, Dong-Ho Kim1, Juliana A U Anzai1, Defne Yucebas1, Soibifaa M Briggs1, Paula A Aduen2, Alice Cronin-Golomb1, Yakeel T Quiroz2,3.   

Abstract

Prior teleneuropsychological research has assessed the reliability between in-person and remote administration of cognitive assessments. Few, if any, studies have examined the test-retest reliability of cognitive assessments conducted in sequential clinic-to-home or home-to-home teleneuropsychological evaluations - a critical issue given the state of clinical practice during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study examined this key psychometric question for several cognitive tests administered over repeated videoconferencing visits 4-6 months apart in a sample of healthy English-speaking adults. A total of 44 participants (ages 18-75) completed baseline and follow-up cognitive testing 4-6 months apart. Testing was conducted in a home-to-home setting over HIPAA-compliant videoconferencing meetings on participants' audio-visual enabled laptop or desktop computers. The following measures were repeated at both virtual visits: the Controlled Oral Word Association Test (FAS), Category Fluency (Animals), and Digit Span Forward and Backward from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, Fourth Edition. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), Pearson correlations, root mean square difference (RMSD), and concordance correlation coefficients (CCC) were calculated as test-retest reliability metrics, and practice effects were assessed using paired-samples t-tests. Some tests exhibited small practice effects, and test-retest reliability was marginal or worse for all measures except FAS, which had adequate reliability (based on ICC and r). Reliability estimates with RMSD suggested that change within +/- 1 SD on these measures may reflect typical test-retest variability. The included cognitive measures exhibited questionable reliability over repeated home-to-home videoconferencing evaluations. Future teleneuropsychology test-retest reliability research is needed with larger, more diverse samples and in clinical populations.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34311660      PMCID: PMC8789947          DOI: 10.1080/13854046.2021.1954244

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol        ISSN: 1385-4046            Impact factor:   3.535


  24 in total

1.  Short test of semantic and phonological fluency: normal performance, validity and test-retest reliability.

Authors:  J E Harrison; P Buxton; M Husain; R Wise
Journal:  Br J Clin Psychol       Date:  2000-06

Review 2.  Reliable Digit Span: a systematic review and cross-validation study.

Authors:  Ryan W Schroeder; Philip Twumasi-Ankrah; Lyle E Baade; Paul S Marshall
Journal:  Assessment       Date:  2011-12-06

Review 3.  Neuropsychological Test Administration by Videoconference: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Timothy W Brearly; Robert D Shura; Sarah L Martindale; Rory A Lazowski; David D Luxton; Brian V Shenal; Jared A Rowland
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 7.444

4.  Teleneuropsychology: evidence for video teleconference-based neuropsychological assessment.

Authors:  C Munro Cullum; L S Hynan; M Grosch; M Parikh; M F Weiner
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 2.892

5.  Neuropsychological assessment and telemedicine: a preliminary study examining the reliability of neuropsychology services performed via telecommunication.

Authors:  Svenn E Jacobsen; Terje Sprenger; Stein Andersson; Jan-Magne Krogstad
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.892

6.  To err is human: "abnormal" neuropsychological scores and variability are common in healthy adults.

Authors:  Laurence M Binder; Grant L Iverson; Brian L Brooks
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 2.813

7.  Validation of a cognitive assessment battery administered over the telephone.

Authors:  Stephen R Rapp; Claudine Legault; Mark A Espeland; Susan M Resnick; Patricia E Hogan; Laura H Coker; Maggie Dailey; Sally A Shumaker
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 5.562

8.  Inter Organizational Practice Committee Recommendations/Guidance for Teleneuropsychology in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic†.

Authors:  Robert M Bilder; Karen S Postal; Mark Barisa; Darrin M Aase; C Munro Cullum; Stephen R Gillaspy; Lana Harder; Geoffrey Kanter; Margaret Lanca; David M Lechuga; Jennifer M Morgan; Randi Most; Antonio E Puente; Christine M Salinas; Jonathan Woodhouse
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 2.813

9.  Validity of In-Home Teleneuropsychological Testing in the Wake of COVID-19.

Authors:  Adam C Parks; Jensen Davis; Carrie D Spresser; Ioan Stroescu; Eric Ecklund-Johnson
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 2.813

10.  Patient Satisfaction with Telephone Neuropsychological Assessment.

Authors:  Laura H Lacritz; Anne R Carlew; Julia Livingstone; K Chase Bailey; Allison Parker; Aislinn Diaz
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 2.813

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  A cultural approach to dementia - insights from US Latino and other minoritized groups.

Authors:  Clara Vila-Castelar; Joshua T Fox-Fuller; Edmarie Guzmán-Vélez; Dorothee Schoemaker; Yakeel T Quiroz
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 44.711

2.  Implementation of a Hybrid Teleneuropsychology Method to Assess Middle Aged and Older Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Amelia Ceslis; Lisa Mackenzie; Gail A Robinson
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 3.448

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.