Megan E Gately1, Scott A Trudeau2, Lauren R Moo3. 1. Tufts University, Bedford VA Medical Center-GRECC. 2. American Occupational Therapy Association. 3. Bedford VA Medical Center-GRECC.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The progressive nature of dementia requires ongoing care delivered by multidisciplinary teams, including rehabilitation professionals, that is individualized to patient and caregiver needs at various points on the disease trajectory. Video telehealth is a rapidly expanding model of care with the potential to expand dementia best practices by increasing the reach of dementia providers to flexible locations, including patients' homes. We review recent evidence for in-home video telehealth for patients with dementia and their caregivers with emphasis on implications for rehabilitation professionals. RECENT FINDINGS: Eleven studies were identified that involved video visits into the home targeting patients with dementia and/or their family caregivers. The majority describe protocolized interventions targeting caregivers in a group format over a finite, pre-determined period. For most, the discipline of the interventionist was unclear, though two studies included rehabilitation interventions. While descriptions of utilized technology were often lacking, many reported that devices were issued to participants when needed, and that technical support was provided by study teams. Positive caregiver outcomes were noted but evidence for patient-level outcomes and cost data are mostly lacking. SUMMARY: More research is needed to demonstrate implementation of dementia best care practices through in-home video telehealth. Though interventions delivered using in-home video telehealth appear to be effective at addressing caregivers' psychosocial concerns, the impact on patients and the implications for rehabilitation remain unclear. Larger, more systematic inquiries comparing in-home video telehealth to traditional visit formats are needed to better define best practices.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The progressive nature of dementia requires ongoing care delivered by multidisciplinary teams, including rehabilitation professionals, that is individualized to patient and caregiver needs at various points on the disease trajectory. Video telehealth is a rapidly expanding model of care with the potential to expand dementia best practices by increasing the reach of dementia providers to flexible locations, including patients' homes. We review recent evidence for in-home video telehealth for patients with dementia and their caregivers with emphasis on implications for rehabilitation professionals. RECENT FINDINGS: Eleven studies were identified that involved video visits into the home targeting patients with dementia and/or their family caregivers. The majority describe protocolized interventions targeting caregivers in a group format over a finite, pre-determined period. For most, the discipline of the interventionist was unclear, though two studies included rehabilitation interventions. While descriptions of utilized technology were often lacking, many reported that devices were issued to participants when needed, and that technical support was provided by study teams. Positive caregiver outcomes were noted but evidence for patient-level outcomes and cost data are mostly lacking. SUMMARY: More research is needed to demonstrate implementation of dementia best care practices through in-home video telehealth. Though interventions delivered using in-home video telehealth appear to be effective at addressing caregivers' psychosocial concerns, the impact on patients and the implications for rehabilitation remain unclear. Larger, more systematic inquiries comparing in-home video telehealth to traditional visit formats are needed to better define best practices.
Entities:
Keywords:
Dementia; Family Caregivers; Telemedicine; Telerehabilitation
Authors: Mary Guerriero Austrom; Kristin N Geros; Kimberly Hemmerlein; Siobhan M McGuire; Sujuan Gao; Steven A Brown; Christopher M Callahan; Daniel O Clark Journal: Dementia (London) Date: 2014-07-25
Authors: Sara J Czaja; David Loewenstein; Richard Schulz; Sankaran N Nair; Dolores Perdomo Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2013-07-03 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Melinda Martin-Khan; Leon Flicker; Richard Wootton; Poh-Kooh Loh; Helen Edwards; Paul Varghese; Gerard J Byrne; Kerenaftali Klein; Leonard C Gray Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2012-05-08 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Jose Manuel Pastora-Bernal; Rocio Martín-Valero; Francisco Javier Barón-López; María José Estebanez-Pérez Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2017-04-28 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Karen B Hirschman; Kathryn H Bowles; Lydia Garcia-Gonzalez; Brooke Shepard; Tracie J Walser; Gladys L Thomas; Michael A Stawnychy; Barbara Riegel Journal: Res Nurs Health Date: 2020-12-20 Impact factor: 2.228
Authors: Susan N Hastings; Elizabeth P Mahanna; Theodore S Z Berkowitz; Valerie A Smith; Ashley L Choate; Jaime M Hughes; Juliessa Pavon; Katina Robinson; Cristina Hendrix; Courtney Van Houtven; Pamela Gentry; Cynthia Rose; Brenda L Plassman; Guy Potter; Eugene Oddone Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2020-09-23 Impact factor: 7.538
Authors: Chelsea E Hawley; Nicole Genovese; Montgomery T Owsiany; Laura K Triantafylidis; Lauren R Moo; Amy M Linsky; Jennifer L Sullivan; Julie M Paik Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2020-10-04 Impact factor: 7.538