| Literature DB >> 28614394 |
André Luis Costa-da-Silva1,2, Rafaella Sayuri Ioshino1,2, Vivian Petersen1,3, Antonio Fernando Lima4, Marielton Dos Passos Cunha5, Michael R Wiley6, Jason T Ladner6, Karla Prieto6, Gustavo Palacios6, Danuza Duarte Costa4, Lincoln Suesdek3,7, Paolo Marinho de Andrade Zanotto5, Margareth Lara Capurro1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The worldwide expansion of new emergent arboviruses such as Chikungunya and Zika reinforces the importance in understanding the role of mosquito species in spreading these pathogens in affected regions. This knowledge is essential for developing effective programs based on species specificity to avoid the establishment of endemic transmission cycles sustained by the identified local vectors. Although the first autochthonous transmission of Chikungunya virus was described in 2014 in the north of Brazil, the main outbreaks were reported in 2015 and 2016 in the northeast of Brazil. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28614394 PMCID: PMC5470658 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005630
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis ISSN: 1935-2727
Fig 1Map of the Aracaju city and neighborhood boundaries.
The neighborhoods where mosquitoes were collected are shaded in gray. The red dotted neighborhood is where CHIKV-positive Ae. aegypti were collected.
Neighborhoods, inspected properties and mosquito species identified in Aracaju city, Sergipe state.
| Neighborhood visited | Inspected properties | Number of species | Number of individuals collected by species | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atalaia | 5 | 3 | 11 | 56 | 1 | 0 |
| São José | 4 | 2 | 4 | 27 | 0 | 0 |
| Industrial | 14 | 3 | 13 | 44 | 0 | 1 |
| Olaria | 8 | 2 | 7 | 18 | 0 | 0 |
| Santa Maria | 1 | 1 | 0 | 31 | 0 | 0 |
| São Conrado | 7 | 4 | 15 | 18 | 1 | 1 |
| 39 | 4 | 50 | 194 | 2 | 2 | |
Collected species and results of one step qRT-PCR diagnostics for Dengue, Chikungunya and Zika viruses.
| Mosquito species analyzed | FEMALES | |||||
| Number of mosquitoes | Pools tested | Positive pools | CHIKV positive mosquitoes | |||
| DENV1-4 | CHIKV | ZIKV | ||||
| 38 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| 111 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Mosquito species analyzed | MALES | |||||
| Number of mosquitoes | Pools tested | Positive pools | ||||
| DENV1-4 | CHIKV | ZIKV | ||||
| 12 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 83 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Fig 2Evolutionary relationship between the three genotypes of CHIKV.
A. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of the CHIKV genomic sequence (KY055011_BRSE_2016) obtained from positive field-caught Ae. aegypti. The numbers on the branches represent the bootstrap values. B. Temporal maximum clade credibility tree of the CHIKV genomic sequence (KY055011_BRSE_2016) obtained from positive field-caught Ae. aegypti. The numbers on the branches represent the posterior probability values.