Literature DB >> 27377354

3D Printed Micro Free-Flow Electrophoresis Device.

Sarah K Anciaux1, Matthew Geiger1, Michael T Bowser1.   

Abstract

The cost, time, and restrictions on creative flexibility associated with current fabrication methods present significant challenges in the development and application of microfluidic devices. Additive manufacturing, also referred to as three-dimensional (3D) printing, provides many advantages over existing methods. With 3D printing, devices can be made in a cost-effective manner with the ability to rapidly prototype new designs. We have fabricated a micro free-flow electrophoresis (μFFE) device using a low-cost, consumer-grade 3D printer. Test prints were performed to determine the minimum feature sizes that could be reproducibly produced using 3D printing fabrication. Microfluidic ridges could be fabricated with dimensions as small as 20 μm high × 640 μm wide. Minimum valley dimensions were 30 μm wide × 130 μm wide. An acetone vapor bath was used to smooth acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS) surfaces and facilitate bonding of fully enclosed channels. The surfaces of the 3D-printed features were profiled and compared to a similar device fabricated in a glass substrate. Stable stream profiles were obtained in a 3D-printed μFFE device. Separations of fluorescent dyes in the 3D-printed device and its glass counterpart were comparable. A μFFE separation of myoglobin and cytochrome c was also demonstrated on a 3D-printed device. Limits of detection for rhodamine 110 were determined to be 2 and 0.3 nM for the 3D-printed and glass devices, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27377354     DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b01573

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


  9 in total

1.  Moving from millifluidic to truly microfluidic sub-100-μm cross-section 3D printed devices.

Authors:  Michael J Beauchamp; Gregory P Nordin; Adam T Woolley
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 4.142

2.  Making the cut: Innovative methods for optimizing perfusion-based migration assays.

Authors:  Andrew W Holt; William E Howard; Elizabeth T Ables; Stephanie M George; Cindy A Kukoly; Jake E Rabidou; Jake T Francisco; Angel N Chukwu; David A Tulis
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 4.355

3.  Reduced surface adsorption in 3D printed acrylonitrile butadiene styrene micro free-flow electrophoresis devices.

Authors:  Sarah K Anciaux; Michael T Bowser
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 3.535

Review 4.  Micro free flow electrophoresis.

Authors:  Alexander C Johnson; Michael T Bowser
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 6.799

Review 5.  3D Printed Microfluidics.

Authors:  Anna V Nielsen; Michael J Beauchamp; Gregory P Nordin; Adam T Woolley
Journal:  Annu Rev Anal Chem (Palo Alto Calif)       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 10.745

Review 6.  Low-cost and open-source strategies for chemical separations.

Authors:  Joshua J Davis; Samuel W Foster; James P Grinias
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2020-12-24       Impact factor: 4.759

7.  Study of Microchannels Fabricated Using Desktop Fused Deposition Modeling Systems.

Authors:  Muhammad Asif Ali Rehmani; Swapna A Jaywant; Khalid Mahmood Arif
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-25       Impact factor: 2.891

Review 8.  Can 3D Printing Bring Droplet Microfluidics to Every Lab?-A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Nafisat Gyimah; Ott Scheler; Toomas Rang; Tamas Pardy
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 2.891

9.  High-Throughput Continuous-Flow Separation in a Micro Free-Flow Electrophoresis Glass Chip Based on Laser Microfabrication.

Authors:  Aodong Zhang; Jian Xu; Xiaolong Li; Zijie Lin; Yunpeng Song; Xin Li; Zhenhua Wang; Ya Cheng
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 3.576

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.