Literature DB >> 28608369

A Five-Tier System for Improving the Categorization of Transplant Program Performance.

Andrew Wey1, Nicholas Salkowski1, Bertram L Kasiske1,2, Ajay K Israni1,2,3, Jon J Snyder1,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To better inform health care consumers by better identifying differences in transplant program performance. DATA SOURCE: Adult kidney transplants performed in the United States, January 1, 2012-June 30, 2014. STUDY
DESIGN: In December 2016, the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients instituted a five-tier system for reporting transplant program performance. We compare the differentiation of program performance and the simulated misclassification rate of the five-tier system with the previous three-tier system based on the 95 percent credible interval. DATA COLLECTION: Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: The five-tier system improved differentiation and maintained a low misclassification rate of less than 22 percent for programs differing by two tiers.
CONCLUSION: The five-tier system will better inform health care consumers of transplant program performance. © Health Research and Educational Trust.

Keywords:  Rating system; transplant program performance

Mesh：

Year:  2017        PMID： 28608369      PMCID： PMC5980219          DOI： 10.1111/1475-6773.12726

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN： 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  10 in total

Review 1.  New Solutions to Reduce Discard of Kidneys Donated for Transplantation.

Authors:  Peter P Reese; Meera N Harhay; Peter L Abt; Matthew H Levine; Scott D Halpern
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 2.  Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients: collecting, analyzing, and reporting data on transplantation in the United States.

Authors:  Susan Leppke; Tabitha Leighton; David Zaun; Shu-Cheng Chen; Melissa Skeans; Ajay K Israni; Jon J Snyder; Bertram L Kasiske
Journal:  Transplant Rev (Orlando)       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 3.943

3.  Bayesian methods for assessing transplant program performance.

Authors:  N Salkowski; J J Snyder; D A Zaun; T Leighton; A K Israni; B L Kasiske
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 8.086

4.  A scientific registry of transplant recipients bayesian method for identifying underperforming transplant programs.

Authors:  N Salkowski; J J Snyder; D A Zaun; T Leighton; E B Edwards; A K Israni; B L Kasiske
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 8.086

5.  The association of center performance evaluations and kidney transplant volume in the United States.

Authors:  J D Schold; L D Buccini; T R Srinivas; R T Srinivas; E D Poggio; S M Flechner; C Soria; D L Segev; J Fung; D A Goldfarb
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 6.  Regulatory oversight in transplantation: are the patients really better off?

Authors:  Thomas E Hamilton
Journal:  Curr Opin Organ Transplant       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.640

7.  Effects of High-Risk Kidneys on Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients Program Quality Reports.

Authors:  J J Snyder; N Salkowski; A Wey; A K Israni; J D Schold; D L Segev; B L Kasiske
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 8.086

8.  Mortality rates after heart transplantation: how to compare center-specific outcome data?

Authors:  J M A Smits; J De Meester; M C Deng; H H Scheld; M Hummel; F Schoendube; A Haverich; J Vanhaecke; H C van Houwelingen
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2003-01-15       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 9.  Developing Statistical Models to Assess Transplant Outcomes Using National Registries: The Process in the United States.

Authors:  Jon J Snyder; Nicholas Salkowski; S Joseph Kim; David Zaun; Hui Xiong; Ajay K Israni; Bertram L Kasiske
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.939

10.  Association of Candidate Removals From the Kidney Transplant Waiting List and Center Performance Oversight.

Authors:  J D Schold; L D Buccini; E D Poggio; S M Flechner; D A Goldfarb
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 8.086
  10 in total
  14 in total

1.  The relationship between the C-statistic and the accuracy of program-specific evaluations.

Authors:  Andrew Wey; Nicholas Salkowski; Bertram L Kasiske; Melissa A Skeans; Sally K Gustafson; Ajay K Israni; Jon J Snyder
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 8.086

2.  Association of pretransplant and posttransplant program ratings with candidate mortality after listing.

Authors:  Andrew Wey; Sally K Gustafson; Nicholas Salkowski; Bertram L Kasiske; Melissa Skeans; Cory R Schaffhausen; Ajay K Israni; Jon J Snyder
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 8.086

3.  Reported effects of the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients 5-tier rating system on US transplant centers: results of a national survey.

Authors:  Sarah E Van Pilsum Rasmussen; Alvin G Thomas; Jacqueline Garonzik-Wang; Macey L Henderson; Sarah S Stith; Dorry L Segev; Lauren Hersch Nicholas
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2018-06-10       Impact factor: 3.782

4.  Comparing Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients posttransplant program-specific outcome ratings at listing with subsequent recipient outcomes after transplant.

Authors:  Andrew Wey; Nicholas Salkowski; Bertram L Kasiske; Melissa Skeans; Cory R Schaffhausen; Sally K Gustafson; Ajay K Israni; Jon J Snyder
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 8.086

5.  The importance of transplant program measures: Surveys of three national patient advocacy groups.

Authors:  Cory R Schaffhausen; Marilyn J Bruin; Sauman Chu; Andrew Wey; Jon J Snyder; Bertram L Kasiske; Ajay K Israni
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 2.863

6.  A Composite End Point of Graft Status and eGFR at 1 Year to Improve the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients' Five-Tier Rating System.

Authors:  Kaicheng Wang; Yanhong Deng; Darren Stewart; Richard N Formica
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 14.978

7.  Seeking new answers to old questions about public reporting of transplant program performance in the United States.

Authors:  Bertram L Kasiske; Andrew Wey; Nicholas Salkowski; David Zaun; Cory R Schaffhausen; Ajay K Israni; Jon J Snyder
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 8.086

8.  Designing a patient-specific search of transplant program performance and outcomes: Feedback from heart transplant candidates and recipients.

Authors:  Warren T McKinney; Cory R Schaffhausen; David Schladt; Marylin J Bruin; Sauman Chu; Jon J Snyder; Cindy Martin; Tamas Alexy; Bertram Kasiske; Ajay K Israni
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2020-12-19       Impact factor: 2.863

9.  A three-tier system for evaluation of organ procurement organizations' willingness to pursue and utilize nonideal donor lungs.

Authors:  Samantha E Halpern; Alec McConnell; Sarah B Peskoe; Vignesh Raman; Oliver K Jawitz; Ashley Y Choi; Megan L Neely; Scott M Palmer; Matthew G Hartwig
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 8.086

10.  Comparing Pretransplant and Posttransplant Outcomes When Choosing a Transplant Center: Focus Groups and a Randomized Survey.

Authors:  Cory R Schaffhausen; Marilyn J Bruin; Sauman Chu; Andrew Wey; Warren T McKinney; Jon J Snyder; Jack R Lake; Arthur J Matas; Bertram L Kasiske; Ajay K Israni
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 5.385
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.