Literature DB >> 30040191

Association of pretransplant and posttransplant program ratings with candidate mortality after listing.

Andrew Wey1, Sally K Gustafson1, Nicholas Salkowski1, Bertram L Kasiske1,2, Melissa Skeans1, Cory R Schaffhausen2, Ajay K Israni1,2,3, Jon J Snyder1,3.   

Abstract

The Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) is responsible for understandable reporting of program metrics, including transplant rate, waitlist mortality, and posttransplant outcomes. SRTR developed five-tier systems for each metric to improve accessibility for the public. We investigated the associations of the five-tier assignments at listing with all-cause candidate mortality after listing, for candidates listed July 12, 2011-June 16, 2014. Transplant rate evaluations with one additional tier were associated with lower mortality after listing in kidney (hazard ratio [HR], 0.93 0.950.97 ), liver (HR, 0.87 0.900.92 ), and heart (HR, 0.92 0.961.00 ) transplantation. For lung transplant patients, mortality after listing was highest at programs with above- and below-average transplant rates and lowest at programs with average transplant rates, suggesting that aggressive acceptance behavior may not always provide a survival benefit. Waitlist mortality evaluations with one additional tier were associated with lower mortality after listing in kidney (HR, 0.94 0.960.99 ) transplantation, and posttransplant graft survival evaluations with one additional tier were associated with lower mortality after listing in lung (HR, 0.90 0.940.98 ) transplantation. Transplant rate typically had the strongest association with mortality after listing, but the strength of associations differed by organ.
© 2018 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Scientific Registry for Transplant Recipients (SRTR); health services and outcomes research; organ transplantation in general; statistics

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30040191      PMCID: PMC6837730          DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transplant        ISSN: 1600-6135            Impact factor:   8.086


  21 in total

1.  Does publicizing hospital performance stimulate quality improvement efforts?

Authors:  Judith H Hibbard; Jean Stockard; Martin Tusler
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Distribution-free inference on contrasts of arbitrary summary measures of survival.

Authors:  Kyle D Rudser; Michael L LeBlanc; Scott S Emerson
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Offer acceptance practices and geographic variability in allocation model for end-stage liver disease at transplant.

Authors:  Andrew Wey; Joshua Pyke; David P Schladt; Sommer E Gentry; Tim Weaver; Nicholas Salkowski; Bertram L Kasiske; Ajay K Israni; Jon J Snyder
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 5.799

4.  The survival benefit of deceased donor liver transplantation as a function of candidate disease severity and donor quality.

Authors:  D E Schaubel; C S Sima; N P Goodrich; S Feng; R M Merion
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2008-01-07       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 5.  Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients: collecting, analyzing, and reporting data on transplantation in the United States.

Authors:  Susan Leppke; Tabitha Leighton; David Zaun; Shu-Cheng Chen; Melissa Skeans; Ajay K Israni; Jon J Snyder; Bertram L Kasiske
Journal:  Transplant Rev (Orlando)       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 3.943

6.  Accountability of Dialysis Facilities in Transplant Referral: CMS Needs to Collect National Data on Dialysis Facility Kidney Transplant Referrals.

Authors:  Kevin John Fowler
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 8.237

7.  The association of center performance evaluations and kidney transplant volume in the United States.

Authors:  J D Schold; L D Buccini; T R Srinivas; R T Srinivas; E D Poggio; S M Flechner; C Soria; D L Segev; J Fung; D A Goldfarb
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 8.086

8.  OPTN/SRTR 2015 Annual Data Report: Lung.

Authors:  M Valapour; M A Skeans; J M Smith; L B Edwards; W S Cherikh; K Uccellini; A K Israni; J J Snyder; B L Kasiske
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 9.  Regulatory oversight in transplantation: are the patients really better off?

Authors:  Thomas E Hamilton
Journal:  Curr Opin Organ Transplant       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.640

Review 10.  Developing Statistical Models to Assess Transplant Outcomes Using National Registries: The Process in the United States.

Authors:  Jon J Snyder; Nicholas Salkowski; S Joseph Kim; David Zaun; Hui Xiong; Ajay K Israni; Bertram L Kasiske
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.939

View more
  6 in total

1.  Tool to Aid Patients in Selecting a Liver Transplant Center.

Authors:  Cory R Schaffhausen; Marilyn J Bruin; Sauman Chu; Helen Fu; Warren T McKinney; David Schladt; Jon J Snyder; W Ray Kim; Jack R Lake; Bertram L Kasiske; Ajay K Israni
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 5.799

2.  How patients choose kidney transplant centers: A qualitative study of patient experiences.

Authors:  Cory R Schaffhausen; Marilyn J Bruin; Warren T McKinney; Jon J Snyder; Arthur J Matas; Bertram L Kasiske; Ajay K Israni
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2019-04-21       Impact factor: 2.863

3.  Designing a patient-specific search of transplant program performance and outcomes: Feedback from heart transplant candidates and recipients.

Authors:  Warren T McKinney; Cory R Schaffhausen; David Schladt; Marylin J Bruin; Sauman Chu; Jon J Snyder; Cindy Martin; Tamas Alexy; Bertram Kasiske; Ajay K Israni
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2020-12-19       Impact factor: 2.863

4.  Don't Throw Your Heart Away: Increased Transparency of Donor Utilization Practices in Transplant Center Report Cards Alters How Center Performance Is Evaluated.

Authors:  Alison E Butler; Gretchen B Chapman
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  Comparing Pretransplant and Posttransplant Outcomes When Choosing a Transplant Center: Focus Groups and a Randomized Survey.

Authors:  Cory R Schaffhausen; Marilyn J Bruin; Sauman Chu; Andrew Wey; Warren T McKinney; Jon J Snyder; Jack R Lake; Arthur J Matas; Bertram L Kasiske; Ajay K Israni
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 5.385

6.  Kidney transplant program waitlisting rate as a metric to assess transplant access.

Authors:  Sudeshna Paul; Taylor Melanson; Sumit Mohan; Katherine Ross-Driscoll; Laura McPherson; Raymond Lynch; Denise Lo; Stephen O Pastan; Rachel E Patzer
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 8.086

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.