Literature DB >> 26814440

Developing Statistical Models to Assess Transplant Outcomes Using National Registries: The Process in the United States.

Jon J Snyder1, Nicholas Salkowski, S Joseph Kim, David Zaun, Hui Xiong, Ajay K Israni, Bertram L Kasiske.   

Abstract

Created by the US National Organ Transplant Act in 1984, the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) is obligated to publicly report data on transplant program and organ procurement organization performance in the United States. These reports include risk-adjusted assessments of graft and patient survival, and programs performing worse or better than expected are identified. The SRTR currently maintains 43 risk adjustment models for assessing posttransplant patient and graft survival and, in collaboration with the SRTR Technical Advisory Committee, has developed and implemented a new systematic process for model evaluation and revision. Patient cohorts for the risk adjustment models are identified, and single-organ and multiorgan transplants are defined, then each risk adjustment model is developed following a prespecified set of steps. Model performance is assessed, the model is refit to a more recent cohort before each evaluation cycle, and then it is applied to the evaluation cohort. The field of solid organ transplantation is unique in the breadth of the standardized data that are collected. These data allow for quality assessment across all transplant providers in the United States. A standardized process of risk model development using data from national registries may enhance the field.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26814440     DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000891

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  20 in total

1.  A Five-Tier System for Improving the Categorization of Transplant Program Performance.

Authors:  Andrew Wey; Nicholas Salkowski; Bertram L Kasiske; Ajay K Israni; Jon J Snyder
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  The relationship between the C-statistic and the accuracy of program-specific evaluations.

Authors:  Andrew Wey; Nicholas Salkowski; Bertram L Kasiske; Melissa A Skeans; Sally K Gustafson; Ajay K Israni; Jon J Snyder
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 8.086

3.  Association of pretransplant and posttransplant program ratings with candidate mortality after listing.

Authors:  Andrew Wey; Sally K Gustafson; Nicholas Salkowski; Bertram L Kasiske; Melissa Skeans; Cory R Schaffhausen; Ajay K Israni; Jon J Snyder
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 8.086

4.  Kidney Transplant Outcomes in Recipients With Cognitive Impairment: A National Registry and Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Alvin G Thomas; Jessica M Ruck; Ashton A Shaffer; Christine E Haugen; Hao Ying; Fatima Warsame; Nadia Chu; Michelle C Carlson; Alden L Gross; Silas P Norman; Dorry L Segev; Mara McAdams-DeMarco
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  Reported effects of the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients 5-tier rating system on US transplant centers: results of a national survey.

Authors:  Sarah E Van Pilsum Rasmussen; Alvin G Thomas; Jacqueline Garonzik-Wang; Macey L Henderson; Sarah S Stith; Dorry L Segev; Lauren Hersch Nicholas
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2018-06-10       Impact factor: 3.782

6.  Correlation Between Kidney Transplant Outcome Metrics and Waitlist Metrics.

Authors:  Sheng Zhou; Courtenay M Holscher; Allan B Massie; Dorry L Segev; Lauren Hersch Nicholas
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  A kidney offer acceptance decision tool to inform the decision to accept an offer or wait for a better kidney.

Authors:  Andrew Wey; Nicholas Salkowski; Walter K Kremers; Cory R Schaffhausen; Bertram L Kasiske; Ajay K Israni; Jon J Snyder
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 8.086

8.  Comparing Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients posttransplant program-specific outcome ratings at listing with subsequent recipient outcomes after transplant.

Authors:  Andrew Wey; Nicholas Salkowski; Bertram L Kasiske; Melissa Skeans; Cory R Schaffhausen; Sally K Gustafson; Ajay K Israni; Jon J Snyder
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 8.086

9.  Kidney transplant outcomes in recipients with visual, hearing, physical and walking impairments: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Alvin G Thomas; Jessica M Ruck; Nadia M Chu; Dayawa Agoons; Ashton A Shaffer; Christine E Haugen; Bonnielin Swenor; Silas P Norman; Jacqueline Garonzik-Wang; Dorry L Segev; Mara McAdams-DeMarco
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 5.992

10.  Seeking new answers to old questions about public reporting of transplant program performance in the United States.

Authors:  Bertram L Kasiske; Andrew Wey; Nicholas Salkowski; David Zaun; Cory R Schaffhausen; Ajay K Israni; Jon J Snyder
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 8.086

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.