Literature DB >> 28608016

Quantitative Assessment of Pancreatic Texture Using a Durometer: A New Tool to Predict the Risk of Developing a Postoperative Fistula.

Giovanni Marchegiani1, Roberto Ballarin2, Giuseppe Malleo3, Stefano Andrianello3, Valentina Allegrini3, Alessandra Pulvirenti3, Marina Paini3, Erica Secchettin3, Fabrizio Boriero4, Fabrizio Di Benedetto2, Claudio Bassi3, Roberto Salvia3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic texture is one of the key predictors of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). Currently, the "gold standard" for assessment of pancreatic texture is surgeon's subjective evaluation through manual palpation. AIM: To evaluate a new "durometer" that is able to assess quantitatively the pancreatic stiffness by measuring its elastic module (i.e., the resistance offered by the pancreatic stump when elastically deformed expressed in mPa).
METHODS: Measurements were obtained from the pancreatic remnant during 138 consecutive PDs performed at the Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery-The Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust. Values were correlated to clinical features and, in particular, with the senior surgeon's evaluation of pancreatic texture (hard/soft). Sixteen beating-heart donors were used as a control group to assess the stiffness of a non-pathologic pancreas. Univariate analysis was performed for the assessment of POPF predictors.
RESULTS: Durometry allowed segregating between non-pathologic, soft and hard pancreas according to surgeon's evaluation (mean values 111 vs. 196 vs. 366 mPa, p < 0.01). There were no significant differences in stiffness with regard to histology, BMI, and neoadjuvant therapy. Larger tumors (>20 mm) and male sex were associated with greater stiffness on univariate analysis. Pancreatic texture, pancreatic duct size, BMI, prior neoadjuvant therapy, and histology were predictors of POPF. Patients who developed POPF showed a lesser stiffness (178 vs. 261 mPa, p = 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Assessment of pancreatic stiffness using a durometer correlated with the surgeon's evaluation of pancreatic texture. Measurement of pancreatic parenchymal stiffness is reliable and correlates with the development of POPF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28608016     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-017-4073-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  28 in total

1.  The risk for immediate postoperative complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy is increased by high frequency of acinar cells and decreased by prevalent fibrosis of the cut edge of pancreas.

Authors:  Matias Laaninen; Merja Bläuer; Kaija Vasama; Haitao Jin; Sari Räty; Juhani Sand; Isto Nordback; Johanna Laukkarinen
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.327

2.  1423 pancreaticoduodenectomies for pancreatic cancer: A single-institution experience.

Authors:  Jordan M Winter; John L Cameron; Kurtis A Campbell; Meghan A Arnold; David C Chang; Joann Coleman; Mary B Hodgin; Patricia K Sauter; Ralph H Hruban; Taylor S Riall; Richard D Schulick; Michael A Choti; Keith D Lillemoe; Charles J Yeo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Reconstruction by pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy following pancreatectomy: results of a comparative study.

Authors:  Claudio Bassi; Massimo Falconi; Enrico Molinari; Roberto Salvia; Giovanni Butturini; Nora Sartori; William Mantovani; Paolo Pederzoli
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Clinical Risk Score to Predict Pancreatic Fistula after Pancreatoduodenectomy: Independent External Validation for Open and Laparoscopic Approaches.

Authors:  Christopher R Shubert; Amy E Wagie; Michael B Farnell; David M Nagorney; Florencia G Que; K Marie Reid Lombardo; Mark J Truty; Rory L Smoot; Michael L Kendrick
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  External pancreatic duct stent decreases pancreatic fistula rate after pancreaticoduodenectomy: prospective multicenter randomized trial.

Authors:  Patrick Pessaux; Alain Sauvanet; Christophe Mariette; François Paye; Fabrice Muscari; Antonio Sa Cunha; Bernard Sastre; Jean-Pierre Arnaud
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Radiological and surgical implications of neoadjuvant treatment with FOLFIRINOX for locally advanced and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Cristina R Ferrone; Giovanni Marchegiani; Theodore S Hong; David P Ryan; Vikram Deshpande; Erin I McDonnell; Francesco Sabbatino; Daniela Dias Santos; Jill N Allen; Lawrence S Blaszkowsky; Jeffrey W Clark; Jason E Faris; Lipika Goyal; Eunice L Kwak; Janet E Murphy; David T Ting; Jennifer Y Wo; Andrew X Zhu; Andrew L Warshaw; Keith D Lillemoe; Carlos Fernández-del Castillo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery: A novel grading system applied to 633 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Michelle L DeOliveira; Jordan M Winter; Markus Schafer; Steven C Cunningham; John L Cameron; Charles J Yeo; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Amylase value in drains after pancreatic resection as predictive factor of postoperative pancreatic fistula: results of a prospective study in 137 patients.

Authors:  Enrico Molinari; Claudio Bassi; Roberto Salvia; Giovanni Butturini; Stefano Crippa; Giorgio Talamini; Massimo Falconi; Paolo Pederzoli
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Fatty pancreas: a factor in postoperative pancreatic fistula.

Authors:  Abhishek Mathur; Henry A Pitt; Megan Marine; Romil Saxena; C Max Schmidt; Thomas J Howard; Attila Nakeeb; Nicholas J Zyromski; Keith D Lillemoe
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  A randomized prospective multicenter trial of pancreaticoduodenectomy with and without routine intraperitoneal drainage.

Authors:  George Van Buren; Mark Bloomston; Steven J Hughes; Jordan Winter; Stephen W Behrman; Nicholas J Zyromski; Charles Vollmer; Vic Velanovich; Taylor Riall; Peter Muscarella; Jose Trevino; Attila Nakeeb; C Max Schmidt; Kevin Behrns; E Christopher Ellison; Omar Barakat; Kyle A Perry; Jeffrey Drebin; Michael House; Sherif Abdel-Misih; Eric J Silberfein; Steven Goldin; Kimberly Brown; Somala Mohammed; Sally E Hodges; Amy McElhany; Mehdi Issazadeh; Eunji Jo; Qianxing Mo; William E Fisher
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Imaging Modalities for Early Detection of Pancreatic Cancer: Current State and Future Research Opportunities.

Authors:  Katherina P Farr; Daniel Moses; Koroush S Haghighi; Phoebe A Phillips; Claudia M Hillenbrand; Boon H Chua
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-21       Impact factor: 6.575

2.  Robotic distal pancreatectomy: can results overcome cost-effectiveness prejudices?

Authors:  Fabrizio Di Benedetto; Roberto Ballarin; Paolo Magistri
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 7.293

3.  New score for prediction of morbidity in patients undergoing open pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Lian Chen; Li Peng; Chao Wang; Sheng-Chao Li; Meng Zhang
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 1.671

4.  Protocol of a prospective study investigating the association of PAncreatic parenchymal RISk factors with postoperative pancreatic fistula after partial pancreaticoduodenectomy (PARIS trial).

Authors:  Fabian Schuh; Matthias A Fink; Manuel Feisst; Christoph Eckert; Colette Dörr-Harim; Phillip Knebel; Markus K Diener; Markus W Büchler; André L Mihaljevic; Pascal Probst
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 3.006

5.  The clinical impact of the perioperative epidural anesthesia on surgical outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Daniel Negrini; Mayan Ihsan; Karine Freitas; Caroline Pollazzon; Jacqueline Graaf; Jorge Andre; Tatiana Linhares; Virna Brandao; Gustavo Silva; Rossano Fiorelli; Patrick Barone
Journal:  Surg Open Sci       Date:  2022-07-22
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.