Literature DB >> 21368658

External pancreatic duct stent decreases pancreatic fistula rate after pancreaticoduodenectomy: prospective multicenter randomized trial.

Patrick Pessaux1, Alain Sauvanet, Christophe Mariette, François Paye, Fabrice Muscari, Antonio Sa Cunha, Bernard Sastre, Jean-Pierre Arnaud.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Pancreatic fistula (PF) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). The aim of this multicenter prospective randomized trial was to compare the results of PD with an external drainage stent versus no stent.
METHODS: Between 2006 and 2009, 158 patients who underwent PD were randomized intraoperatively to either receive an external stent inserted across the anastomosis to drain the pancreatic duct (n = 77) or no stent (n = 81). The criteria of inclusion were soft pancreas and a diameter of wirsung <3 mm. The primary study end point was PF rate defined as amylase-rich fluid (amylase concentration >3 times the upper limit of normal serum amylase level) collected from the peripancreatic drains after postoperative day 3. CT scan was routinely done on day 7.
RESULTS: The 2 groups were comparable concerning demographic data, underlying pathologies, presenting symptoms, presence of comorbid illness, and proportion of patients with preoperative biliary drainage. Mortality, morbidity, and PF rates were 3.8%, 51.8%, and 34.2%, respectively. Stented group had a significantly lower overall PF (26% vs. 42%; P = 0.034), morbidity (41.5% vs. 61.7%; P = 0.01), and delayed gastric emptying (7.8% vs. 27.2%; P = 0.001) rates compared with nonstented group. Radiologic or surgical intervention for PF was required in 9 patients in the stented group and 12 patients in the nonstented group. There were no significant differences in mortality rate (3.7% vs. 3.9%; P = 0.37) and in hospital stay (22 days vs. 26 days; P = 0.11).
CONCLUSION: External drainage of pancreatic duct with a stent reduced. PF and overall morbidity rates after PD in high risk patients (soft pancreatic texture and a nondilated pancreatic duct). (C) 2011 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21368658     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31821219af

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  57 in total

Review 1.  Pancreatic surgery: evolution and current tailored approach.

Authors:  Mario Zovak; Dubravka Mužina Mišić; Goran Glavčić
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 7.293

2.  Surgery for Pancreatic and Periampullary Carcinoma.

Authors:  Abhishek Mitra; Ashwin D'Souza; Mahesh Goel; Shailesh V Shrikhande
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2015-10-10       Impact factor: 0.656

3.  Pancreaticodigestive anastomosis and the postoperative management strategies to prevent postoperative pancreatic fistula formation after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Daisuke Hashimoto; Akira Chikamoto; Masaki Ohmuraya; Masahiko Hirota; Hideo Baba
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Pancreatoduodenectomy--current status of surgical and perioperative techniques in Germany.

Authors:  Christina Haane; Wolf Arif Mardin; Britta Schmitz; Sameer Dhayat; Richard Hummel; Norbert Senninger; Christina Schleicher; Soeren Torge Mees
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2013-10-19       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Pancreatoduodenectomy - preventing complications.

Authors:  Prasanth Penumadu; Savio G Barreto; Mahesh Goel; Shailesh V Shrikhande
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-01-19

6.  Peri-operative risk factors for delayed gastric emptying after a pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Jamie R Robinson; Paula Marincola; Julia Shelton; Nipun B Merchant; Kamran Idrees; Alexander A Parikh
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 3.647

7.  Externalized Stents for Pancreatoduodenectomy Provide Value Only in High-Risk Scenarios.

Authors:  Matthew T McMillan; Brett L Ecker; Stephen W Behrman; Mark P Callery; John D Christein; Jeffrey A Drebin; Douglas L Fraker; Tara S Kent; Major K Lee; Robert E Roses; Michael H Sprys; Charles M Vollmer
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Pancreaticoduodenectomy can be safely performed in the elderly.

Authors:  Shuji Suzuki; Satoshi Kaji; Nobusada Koike; Nobuhiko Harada; Mamoru Suzuki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-10-27       Impact factor: 2.549

9.  Polyester Preserves the Highest Breaking Point After Prolonged Incubation in Pancreatic Juice.

Authors:  Stefano Andrianello; Giovanni Marchegiani; Biagio Anselmi; Erica Secchettin; Fabrizio Boriero; Giuseppe Malleo; Roberto Salvia; Claudio Bassi
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 10.  Predictive factors for pancreatic fistula following pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Matthew T McMillan; Charles M Vollmer
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 3.445

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.