Literature DB >> 33578409

Platinum dissolution and tissue response following long-term electrical stimulation at high charge densities.

Robert K Shepherd1,2, Paul M Carter3, Ashley N Dalrymple1,4, Ya Lang Enke3, Andrew K Wise1,2, Trung Nguyen1, James Firth1, Alex Thompson1, James B Fallon1,2.   

Abstract

Objective. Established guidelines for safe levels of electrical stimulation for neural prostheses are based on a limited range of the stimulus parameters used clinically. Recent studies have reported particulate platinum (Pt) associated with long-term clinical use of these devices, highlighting the need for more carefully defined safety limits. We previously reported no adverse effects of Pt corrosion products in the cochleae of guinea pigs following 4 weeks of electrical stimulation using charge densities far greater than the published safe limits for cochlear implants. The present study examines the histopathological effects of Pt within the cochlea following continuous stimulation at a charge density well above the defined safe limits for periods up to 6 months.Approach. Six cats were bilaterally implanted with Pt electrode arrays and unilaterally stimulated using charge balanced current pulses at a charge density of 267μC cm-2phase-1using a tripolar electrode configuration. Electrochemical measurements were made throughout the implant duration and evoked potentials recorded at the outset and on completion of the stimulation program. Cochleae were examined histologically for particulate Pt, tissue response, and auditory nerve survival; electrodes were examined for surface corrosion; and cochlea, brain, kidney, and liver tissue analysed for trace levels of Pt.Main results. Chronic stimulation resulted in both a significant increase in tissue response and particulate Pt within the tissue capsule surrounding the electrode array compared with implanted, unstimulated control cochleae. Importantly, there was no stimulus-induced loss of auditory neurons (ANs) or increase in evoked potential thresholds. Stimulated electrodes were significantly more corroded compared with unstimulated electrodes. Trace analysis revealed Pt in both stimulated and control cochleae although significantly greater levels were detected within stimulated cochleae. There was no evidence of Pt in brain or liver; however, trace levels of Pt were recorded in the kidneys of two animals. Finally, increased charge storage capacity and charge injection limit reflected the more extensive electrode corrosion associated with stimulated electrodes.Significance. Long-term electrical stimulation of Pt electrodes at a charge density well above existing safety limits and nearly an order of magnitude higher than levels used clinically, does not adversely affect the AN population or reduce neural function, despite a stimulus-induced tissue response and the accumulation of Pt corrosion product. The mechanism resulting in Pt within the unstimulated cochlea is unclear, while the level of Pt observed systemically following stimulation at these very high charge densities does not appear to be of clinical significance. Creative Commons Attribution license.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cochlear implant; corrosion; electrical stimulation; electrode; neural prosthesis; neurotechnology; platinum; stimulation safety

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33578409      PMCID: PMC8711780          DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/abe5ba

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  57 in total

1.  Chronic electrical stimulation by a cochlear implant promotes survival of spiral ganglion neurons after neonatal deafness.

Authors:  P A Leake; G T Hradek; R L Snyder
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1999-10-04       Impact factor: 3.215

2.  Impedance spectroscopy.

Authors:  J R Macdonald
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 3.  Electrical stimulation of excitable tissue: design of efficacious and safe protocols.

Authors:  Daniel R Merrill; Marom Bikson; John G R Jefferys
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 2.390

Review 4.  Neural stimulation and recording electrodes.

Authors:  Stuart F Cogan
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.590

5.  Evaluation of focused multipolar stimulation for cochlear implants: a preclinical safety study.

Authors:  Robert K Shepherd; Andrew K Wise; Ya Lang Enke; Paul M Carter; James B Fallon
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 5.379

6.  Dissemination of wear particles to the liver, spleen, and abdominal lymph nodes of patients with hip or knee replacement.

Authors:  R M Urban; J J Jacobs; M J Tomlinson; J Gavrilovic; J Black; M Peoc'h
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation at high charge densities results in platinum dissolution but not neural loss or functional changes in vivo.

Authors:  Robert K Shepherd; Paul M Carter; Ya Lang Enke; Andrew K Wise; James B Fallon
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 8.  Mechanisms of Cisplatin nephrotoxicity.

Authors:  Ronald P Miller; Raghu K Tadagavadi; Ganesan Ramesh; William Brian Reeves
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 4.546

9.  Improved Auditory Nerve Survival with Nanoengineered Supraparticles for Neurotrophin Delivery into the Deafened Cochlea.

Authors:  Andrew K Wise; Justin Tan; Yajun Wang; Frank Caruso; Robert K Shepherd
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Postmortem investigation of a human cortical visual prosthesis that was implanted for 36 years.

Authors:  Vernon L Towle; Peter Pytel; Frank Lane; John Plass; David M Frim; Philip R Troyk
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 5.379

View more
  3 in total

1.  Stimulation of the dorsal root ganglion using an Injectrode®.

Authors:  Ashley N Dalrymple; Jordyn E Ting; Rohit Bose; James K Trevathan; Stephan Nieuwoudt; Scott F Lempka; Manfred Franke; Kip A Ludwig; Andrew J Shoffstall; Lee E Fisher; Douglas J Weber
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 5.379

2.  Biocompatibility of Platinum Nanoparticles in Brain ex vivo Models in Physiological and Pathological Conditions.

Authors:  Maurizio Gulino; Sofia Duque Santos; Ana Paula Pêgo
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 4.677

3.  Biofeedback electrostimulation for bionic and long-lasting neural modulation.

Authors:  Fei Jin; Tong Li; Zhidong Wei; Ruiying Xiong; Lili Qian; Juan Ma; Tao Yuan; Qi Wu; Chengteng Lai; Xiying Ma; Fuyi Wang; Ying Zhao; Fengyu Sun; Ting Wang; Zhang-Qi Feng
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 17.694

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.