Literature DB >> 25420148

Evaluation of focused multipolar stimulation for cochlear implants in acutely deafened cats.

Shefin S George, Andrew K Wise, Mohit N Shivdasani, Robert K Shepherd, James B Fallon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The conductive nature of the fluids and tissues of the cochlea can lead to broad activation of spiral ganglion neurons using contemporary cochlear implant stimulation configurations such as monopolar (MP) stimulation. The relatively poor spatial selectivity is thought to limit implant performance, particularly in noisy environments. Several current focusing techniques have been proposed to reduce the spread of activation with the aim towards achieving improved clinical performance. APPROACH: The present research evaluated the efficacy of focused multipolar (FMP) stimulation, a relatively new focusing technique in the cochlea, and compared its efficacy to both MP stimulation and tripolar (TP) stimulation. The spread of neural activity across the inferior colliculus (IC), measured by recording the spatial tuning curve, was used as a measure of spatial selectivity. Adult cats (n = 6) were acutely deafened and implanted with an intracochlear electrode array before multi-unit responses were recorded across the cochleotopic gradient of the contralateral IC. Recordings were made in response to acoustic and electrical stimulation using the MP, TP and FMP configurations. MAIN
RESULTS: FMP and TP stimulation resulted in greater spatial selectivity than MP stimulation. However, thresholds were significantly higher (p < 0.001) for FMP and TP stimulation compared to MP stimulation. There were no differences found in spatial selectivity and threshold between FMP and TP stimulation. SIGNIFICANCE: The greater spatial selectivity of FMP and TP stimulation would be expected to result in improved clinical performance. However, further research will be required to demonstrate the efficacy of these modes of stimulation after longer durations of deafness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25420148     DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/11/6/065003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  8 in total

1.  Effect of current focusing on the sensitivity of inferior colliculus neurons to amplitude-modulated stimulation.

Authors:  Shefin S George; Mohit N Shivdasani; James B Fallon
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Auditory Detection Thresholds and Cochlear Resistivity Differ Between Pediatric Cochlear Implant Listeners With Enlarged Vestibular Aqueduct and Those With Connexin-26 Mutations.

Authors:  Kelly N Jahn; Molly D Bergan; Julie G Arenberg
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 1.493

3.  Evaluation of focused multipolar stimulation for cochlear implants: a preclinical safety study.

Authors:  Robert K Shepherd; Andrew K Wise; Ya Lang Enke; Paul M Carter; James B Fallon
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 5.379

4.  Temporal properties of inferior colliculus neurons to photonic stimulation in the cochlea.

Authors:  Xiaodong Tan; Hunter Young; Agnella Izzo Matic; Whitney Zirkle; Suhrud Rajguru; Claus-Peter Richter
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2015-08

Review 5.  Cochlear Implant Research and Development in the Twenty-first Century: A Critical Update.

Authors:  Robert P Carlyon; Tobias Goehring
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-08-25

6.  Tonotopic Selectivity in Cats and Humans: Electrophysiology and Psychophysics.

Authors:  Francois Guérit; John C Middlebrooks; Matthew L Richardson; Akshat Arneja; Andrew J Harland; Robin Gransier; Jan Wouters; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-06-13

7.  Viral-mediated transduction of auditory neurons with opsins for optical and hybrid activation.

Authors:  Rachael T Richardson; Alex C Thompson; Andrew K Wise; Elise A Ajay; Niliksha Gunewardene; Stephen J O'Leary; Paul R Stoddart; James B Fallon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Optical stimulation of neural tissue.

Authors:  Rachael Theresa Richardson; Michael R Ibbotson; Alexander C Thompson; Andrew K Wise; James B Fallon
Journal:  Healthc Technol Lett       Date:  2020-06-25
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.