Monica K Silver1, Jie Shao2, Binquan Zhu2, Minjian Chen3, Yankai Xia3, Niko Kaciroti4, Betsy Lozoff5, John D Meeker6. 1. Department of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. 2. Department of Child Health Care, Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China. 3. Institute of Toxicology, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China. 4. Center for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. 5. Center for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. 6. Department of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. Electronic address: meekerj@umich.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Organophosphate insecticides (OPs) are used worldwide, yet despite nearly ubiquitous exposure in the general population, few have been studied outside the laboratory. Fetal brains undergo rapid growth and development, leaving them susceptible to long-term effects of neurotoxic OPs. The objective here was to investigate the extent to which prenatal exposure to OPs affects infant motor development. METHODS: 30 OPs were measured in umbilical cord blood using gas chromatography tandem mass spectrometry in a cohort of Chinese infants. Motor function was assessed at 6-weeks and 9-months using Peabody Developmental Motor Scales 2nd edition (PDMS-2) (n=199). Outcomes included subtest scores: reflexes, stationary, locomotion, grasping, visual-motor integration (V-M), composite scores: gross (GM), fine (FM), total motor (TM), and standardized motor quotients: gross (GMQ), fine (FMQ), total motor (TMQ). RESULTS: Naled, methamidophos, trichlorfon, chlorpyrifos, and phorate were detected in ≥10% of samples. Prenatal naled and chlorpyrifos were associated with decreased 9-month motor function. Scores were 0.55, 0.85, and 0.90 points lower per 1ng/mL increase in log-naled, for V-M (p=0.04), FM (p=0.04), and FMQ (p=0.08), respectively. For chlorpyrifos, scores were 0.50, 1.98, 0.80, 1.91, 3.49, 2.71, 6.29, 2.56, 2.04, and 2.59 points lower for exposed versus unexposed infants, for reflexes (p=0.04), locomotion (p=0.02), grasping (p=0.05), V-M (p<0.001), GM (p=0.007), FM (p=0.002), TM (p<0.001), GMQ (p=0.01), FMQ (p=0.07), and TMQ (p=0.008), respectively. Girls appeared to be more sensitive to the negative effects of OPs on 9-month motor function than boys. CONCLUSIONS: We found deficits in 9-month motor function in infants with prenatal exposure to naled and chlorpyrifos. Naled is being aerially sprayed to combat mosquitoes carrying Zika virus, yet this is the first non-occupational human study of its health effects. Delays in early-motor skill acquisition may be detrimental for downstream development and cognition.
BACKGROUND:Organophosphate insecticides (OPs) are used worldwide, yet despite nearly ubiquitous exposure in the general population, few have been studied outside the laboratory. Fetal brains undergo rapid growth and development, leaving them susceptible to long-term effects of neurotoxicOPs. The objective here was to investigate the extent to which prenatal exposure to OPs affects infant motor development. METHODS: 30 OPs were measured in umbilical cord blood using gas chromatography tandem mass spectrometry in a cohort of Chinese infants. Motor function was assessed at 6-weeks and 9-months using Peabody Developmental Motor Scales 2nd edition (PDMS-2) (n=199). Outcomes included subtest scores: reflexes, stationary, locomotion, grasping, visual-motor integration (V-M), composite scores: gross (GM), fine (FM), total motor (TM), and standardized motor quotients: gross (GMQ), fine (FMQ), total motor (TMQ). RESULTS:Naled, methamidophos, trichlorfon, chlorpyrifos, and phorate were detected in ≥10% of samples. Prenatal naled and chlorpyrifos were associated with decreased 9-month motor function. Scores were 0.55, 0.85, and 0.90 points lower per 1ng/mL increase in log-naled, for V-M (p=0.04), FM (p=0.04), and FMQ (p=0.08), respectively. For chlorpyrifos, scores were 0.50, 1.98, 0.80, 1.91, 3.49, 2.71, 6.29, 2.56, 2.04, and 2.59 points lower for exposed versus unexposed infants, for reflexes (p=0.04), locomotion (p=0.02), grasping (p=0.05), V-M (p<0.001), GM (p=0.007), FM (p=0.002), TM (p<0.001), GMQ (p=0.01), FMQ (p=0.07), and TMQ (p=0.008), respectively. Girls appeared to be more sensitive to the negative effects of OPs on 9-month motor function than boys. CONCLUSIONS: We found deficits in 9-month motor function in infants with prenatal exposure to naled and chlorpyrifos. Naled is being aerially sprayed to combat mosquitoes carrying Zika virus, yet this is the first non-occupational human study of its health effects. Delays in early-motor skill acquisition may be detrimental for downstream development and cognition.
Authors: D Koutroulakis; S Sifakis; M N Tzatzarakis; A K Alegakis; E Theodoropoulou; M P Kavvalakis; D Kappou; A M Tsatsakis Journal: Reprod Toxicol Date: 2014-03-29 Impact factor: 3.143
Authors: Jessica G Young; Brenda Eskenazi; Eleanor A Gladstone; Asa Bradman; Lesley Pedersen; Caroline Johnson; Dana B Barr; Clement E Furlong; Nina T Holland Journal: Neurotoxicology Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 4.294
Authors: D B Barr; J R Barr; W J Driskell; R H Hill; D L Ashley; L L Needham; S L Head; E J Sampson Journal: Toxicol Ind Health Date: 1999 Jan-Mar Impact factor: 2.273
Authors: Stephanie M Engel; Gertrud S Berkowitz; Dana B Barr; Susan L Teitelbaum; Jodi Siskind; Stefanie J Meisel; James G Wetmur; Mary S Wolff Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2007-04-03 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Brenda Eskenazi; Karen Huen; Amy Marks; Kim G Harley; Asa Bradman; Dana Boyd Barr; Nina Holland Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Asa Bradman; Rosemary Castorina; Dana Boyd Barr; Jonathan Chevrier; Martha E Harnly; Ellen A Eisen; Thomas E McKone; Kim Harley; Nina Holland; Brenda Eskenazi Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2011-04-08 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Andrea Lucchi; Edith Ladurner; Andrea Iodice; Francesco Savino; Renato Ricciardi; Francesca Cosci; Giuseppe Conte; Giovanni Benelli Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Date: 2018-01-19 Impact factor: 4.223
Authors: Ixel Hernandez-Castro; Sandrah P Eckel; Thomas Chavez; Mark Johnson; Deborah Lerner; Brendan Grubbs; Claudia M Toledo-Corral; Shohreh F Farzan; Rima Habre; Genevieve F Dunton; Carrie V Breton; Theresa M Bastain Journal: Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol Date: 2021-12-29 Impact factor: 3.980
Authors: Astrid N Zamora; Deborah J Watkins; Karen E Peterson; Martha M Téllez-Rojo; Howard Hu; John D Meeker; Alejandra Cantoral; Adriana Mercado-García; Erica C Jansen Journal: Environ Res Date: 2021-08-29 Impact factor: 6.498