Literature DB >> 10188199

Strategies for biological monitoring of exposure for contemporary-use pesticides.

D B Barr1, J R Barr, W J Driskell, R H Hill, D L Ashley, L L Needham, S L Head, E J Sampson.   

Abstract

Pesticides are used on a massive scale in the United States. The widespread use of these pesticides has made it virtually impossible for the average person to avoid exposure at some level. Generally, it is believed that low-level exposure to these pesticides does not produce acute toxic effects; however, various cancers and other noncancer health endpoints have been associated with chronic exposure to several groups of pesticides. Therefore, it is imperative that well-designed studies investigate the potential relationship between contemporary pesticide exposure and health effects. For these studies to be accurate, reliable methods for determining individual exposure must be used. Biological monitoring is a useful tool for assessing exposure to some contemporary pesticides. As with any analytical method, biological monitoring entails many difficulties, but, in many instances, they can be overcome by the logical use of available information and information acquired in carefully designed studies. At the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), we have acquired extensive experience in the development and application of specific techniques for biological monitoring of a variety of toxicants, including many of the contemporary-use pesticides. We have used these methods to measure the internal dose of pesticides received by people in acute and chronic incidents resulting from both environmental and industrial exposure. Additionally, we have established normative values, or reference ranges, of several pesticides based on measurements of their metabolites in the urine of randomly selected adults in the US population. These data have been successfully used to distinguish overt exposures from 'background' exposure. In this paper, we present several examples of the usefulness of biological monitoring in urine and blood and describe the difficulties involved with developing methods in these matrices. We also present a general strategy, considerations, and recommendations for developing biological monitoring techniques for measuring the internal dose of contemporary-use pesticides.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10188199     DOI: 10.1191/074823399678846556

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Ind Health        ISSN: 0748-2337            Impact factor:   2.273


  40 in total

1.  Response to Commentary on "Agricultural exposures and gastric cancer risk in Hispanic farm workers in California" (Mills, P.K., and Yang, R.C., Environmental Research (2007) 104, 282-289).

Authors:  Paul K Mills
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 6.498

2.  Characterization of Pesticide Exposure in a Sample of Pregnant Women in Ecuador.

Authors:  Alexis J Handal; Lauren Hund; Maritza Páez; Samantha Bear; Carolyn Greenberg; Richard A Fenske; Dana Boyd Barr
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Neurobehavioral effects of exposure to organophosphates and pyrethroid pesticides among Thai children.

Authors:  Nancy Fiedler; Juthasiri Rohitrattana; Wattasit Siriwong; Panrapee Suttiwan; Pam Ohman Strickland; P Barry Ryan; Diane S Rohlman; Parinya Panuwet; Dana Boyd Barr; Mark G Robson
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 4.294

4.  Prenatal organophosphate insecticide exposure and infant sensory function.

Authors:  Monica K Silver; Jie Shao; Chai Ji; Binquan Zhu; Lin Xu; Mingyan Li; Minjian Chen; Yankai Xia; Niko Kaciroti; Betsy Lozoff; John D Meeker
Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 5.840

Review 5.  Neurodevelopmental effects in children associated with exposure to organophosphate pesticides: a systematic review.

Authors:  María Teresa Muñoz-Quezada; Boris A Lucero; Dana B Barr; Kyle Steenland; Karen Levy; P Barry Ryan; Veronica Iglesias; Sergio Alvarado; Carlos Concha; Evelyn Rojas; Catalina Vega
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 4.294

Review 6.  Organophosphorus pesticide determination in biological specimens: bioanalytical and toxicological aspects.

Authors:  Sofia Soares; Tiago Rosado; Mário Barroso; Duarte Nuno Vieira; Eugenia Gallardo
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 2.686

7.  Is the World Health Organization predicted exposure assessment model for space spraying of insecticides applicable to agricultural farmers?

Authors:  Dung Phung; Greg Miller; Des Connell; Cordia Chu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-11-11       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  Home-based community health worker intervention to reduce pesticide exposures to farmworkers' children: A randomized-controlled trial.

Authors:  Alicia L Salvatore; Rosemary Castorina; José Camacho; Norma Morga; Jesús López; Marcia Nishioka; Dana B Barr; Brenda Eskenazi; Asa Bradman
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 5.563

9.  Comparison of current-use pesticide and other toxicant urinary metabolite levels among pregnant women in the CHAMACOS cohort and NHANES.

Authors:  Rosemary Castorina; Asa Bradman; Laura Fenster; Dana Boyd Barr; Roberto Bravo; Michelle G Vedar; Martha E Harnly; Thomas E McKone; Ellen A Eisen; Brenda Eskenazi
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Serum persistent organic pollutants and duration of lactation among Mexican-American women.

Authors:  Rosana H Weldon; Monique Webster; Kim G Harley; Asa Bradman; Laura Fenster; Mark D Davis; Alan Hubbard; Dana B Barr; Nina Holland; Brenda Eskenazi
Journal:  J Environ Public Health       Date:  2010-06-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.