| Literature DB >> 31297333 |
Nancy Hallal1, Hiba El Khayat El Sabbouri2,3, Ali Salami2, Wiam Ramadan2,4, Hassan Khachfe4, Mohamed E Moustafa1,5, Mahmoud Khalil1, Wissam H Joumaa2.
Abstract
AIM: Investigate the effect of dietary exposure to chlorpyrifos on locomotion and contraction of soleus andextensor digitorum longus (edl) involved in locomotion.Entities:
Keywords: Chlorpyrifos; Contraction; Extensor digitorum longus; Locomotion; Soleus
Year: 2019 PMID: 31297333 PMCID: PMC6597941 DOI: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2019.06.006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxicol Rep ISSN: 2214-7500
Fig. 1Changes in body weight of the rats within the three groups (n = 10 in each group) over the six weeks after repeated exposure to 1 mg kg−1 (CPF1 group) or 5 mg kg−1 (CPF5 group) to CPF compared to the control group. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. *: p < 0.05.
Fig. 2Beam walking test/ latency time. Latency time for rats within the three groups (n = 10 in each group) to cross the beam was recorded on a weekly basis during the 6 weeks of CPF exposure. The data are depicted as mean ± SEM. *: p < 0.05.
Fig. 3Beam walking test/ hind-limb slips. Number of hind-limb slips for rats within the three groups (n = 10 in each group) was recorded weekly in the beam walking test during the 6 weeks of CPF exposure. The data are depicted as mean ± SEM.*: p < 0.05.
Fig. 4Beam balance test. Latency from when the animal grasped the horizontal rod to when it fell from it was recorded on a weekly basis during the 6 weeks of CPF exposure within the three tested groups (n = 10 for each group). The data are depicted as mean ± SEM. *: p < 0.05.
Fig. 5Representative twitch contractions in vitro. Responses developed by (a) edl fast-twitch fiber preparation and (b) soleus slow- twitch fiber preparation in control, CPF1 and CPF5 after 6 weeks of treatment (n = 10 for each group).
Fig. 6Representative tetanic contractions in vitro. Responses developed by (a) edl fast-twitch fiber preparation and (b) soleus slow- twitch fiber preparation in control, CPF1 and CPF5 after 6 weeks of treatment (n = 10 for each group).
Fig. 7Changes in the myofibrillar protein content in (a) edl and (b) soleus and in the soluble total contractile protein content in (c) edl and (d) soleus after 6 weeks of CPF exposure. The data are depicted as mean ± SEM. *: p < 0.05.
Effects of CPF1 and CPF5 on Myosin Heavy Chain (MHC) percent and type composition of rat skeletal muscles, edl and soleus.
| % Type I | % Type IIa | % Type IIx | % Type IIb | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 3.64 ± 0.91 | 48.67 ± 2.69 | 42.15 ± 1.81 | 5.54 ± 1.02 | |
| CPF 1 | 2.02 ± 1.31 | 58.64 ± 3.02 | 29.88 ± 1.63 | 9.44 ± 2.86 | |
| CPF 5 | 0.83 ± 0.83 | 53.62 ± 1.23 | 35.09 ± 2.35 | 10.46 ± 0.97 | |
| Soleus | Control | 70.15 ± 2.46 | 29.85 ± 2.46 | 0 | 0 |
| CPF 1 | 81.43 ± 2.84 | 18.57 ± 2.85 | 0 | 0 | |
| CPF 5 | 70.24 ± 1.65 | 29.76 ± 1.65 | 0 | 0 | |
p < 0.05. The data are depicted as mean ± SEM.
Fig. 8Representative electrophoretogram of MHC isoforms in (a) edl and (b) soleus for the three tested groups: control, CPF1 and CPF5.