Literature DB >> 33729798

Machine Learning Models of Arsenic in Private Wells Throughout the Conterminous United States As a Tool for Exposure Assessment in Human Health Studies.

Melissa A Lombard1, Molly Scannell Bryan2, Daniel K Jones3, Catherine Bulka4, Paul M Bradley5, Lorraine C Backer6, Michael J Focazio7, Debra T Silverman8, Patricia Toccalino9, Maria Argos10, Matthew O Gribble11, Joseph D Ayotte1.   

Abstract

Arsenic from geologic sources is widespread in groundwater within the United States (U.S.). In several areas, groundwater arsenic concentrations exceed the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency maximum contaminant level of 10 μg per liter (μg/L). However, this standard applies only to public-supply drinking water and not to private-supply, which is not federally regulated and is rarely monitored. As a result, arsenic exposure from private wells is a potentially substantial, but largely hidden, public health concern. Machine learning models using boosted regression trees (BRT) and random forest classification (RFC) techniques were developed to estimate probabilities and concentration ranges of arsenic in private wells throughout the conterminous U.S. Three BRT models were fit separately to estimate the probability of private well arsenic concentrations exceeding 1, 5, or 10 μg/L whereas the RFC model estimates the most probable category (≤5, >5 to ≤10, or >10 μg/L). Overall, the models perform best at identifying areas with low concentrations of arsenic in private wells. The BRT 10 μg/L model estimates for testing data have an overall accuracy of 91.2%, sensitivity of 33.9%, and specificity of 98.2%. Influential variables identified across all models included average annual precipitation and soil geochemistry. Models were developed in collaboration with public health experts to support U.S.-based studies focused on health effects from arsenic exposure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33729798      PMCID: PMC8852770          DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.0c05239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  59 in total

1.  Predicting Arsenic in Drinking Water Wells of the Central Valley, California.

Authors:  Joseph D Ayotte; Bernard T Nolan; Jo Ann Gronberg
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Groundwater arsenic contamination in Burkina Faso, West Africa: Predicting and verifying regions at risk.

Authors:  Anja Bretzler; Franck Lalanne; Julien Nikiema; Joel Podgorski; Numa Pfenninger; Michael Berg; Mario Schirmer
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 7.963

3.  Bladder cancer mortality and private well use in New England: an ecological study.

Authors:  Joseph D Ayotte; Dalsu Baris; Kenneth P Cantor; Joanne Colt; Gilpin R Robinson; Jay H Lubin; Margaret Karagas; Robert N Hoover; Joseph F Fraumeni; Debra T Silverman
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Arsenic pollution of groundwater in Vietnam exacerbated by deep aquifer exploitation for more than a century.

Authors:  Lenny H E Winkel; Thi Kim Trang Pham; Mai Lan Vi; Caroline Stengel; Manouchehr Amini; Thi Ha Nguyen; Hung Viet Pham; Michael Berg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Arsenic toxicity and potential mechanisms of action.

Authors:  Michael F Hughes
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  2002-07-07       Impact factor: 4.372

6.  Water quality and management of private drinking water wells in Pennsylvania.

Authors:  Bryan R Swistock; Stephanie Clemens; William E Sharpe; Shawn Rummel
Journal:  J Environ Health       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.179

Review 7.  A Meta-analysis of Arsenic Exposure and Lung Function: Is There Evidence of Restrictive or Obstructive Lung Disease?

Authors:  Tiffany R Sanchez; Martha Powers; Matthew Perzanowski; Christine M George; Joseph H Graziano; Ana Navas-Acien
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2018-06

Review 8.  The Association of Arsenic Metabolism with Cancer, Cardiovascular Disease, and Diabetes: A Systematic Review of the Epidemiological Evidence.

Authors:  Chin-Chi Kuo; Katherine A Moon; Shu-Li Wang; Ellen Silbergeld; Ana Navas-Acien
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Water arsenic exposure and children's intellectual function in Araihazar, Bangladesh.

Authors:  Gail A Wasserman; Xinhua Liu; Faruque Parvez; Habibul Ahsan; Pam Factor-Litvak; Alexander van Geen; Vesna Slavkovich; Nancy J LoIacono; Zhongqi Cheng; Iftikhar Hussain; Hassina Momotaj; Joseph H Graziano
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 10.  Arsenic and Environmental Health: State of the Science and Future Research Opportunities.

Authors:  Danielle J Carlin; Marisa F Naujokas; Karen D Bradham; John Cowden; Michelle Heacock; Heather F Henry; Janice S Lee; David J Thomas; Claudia Thompson; Erik J Tokar; Michael P Waalkes; Linda S Birnbaum; William A Suk
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  5 in total

1.  Arsenic in private well water and birth outcomes in the United States.

Authors:  Catherine M Bulka; Molly Scannell Bryan; Melissa A Lombard; Scott M Bartell; Daniel K Jones; Paul M Bradley; Veronica M Vieira; Debra T Silverman; Michael Focazio; Patricia L Toccalino; Johnni Daniel; Lorraine C Backer; Joseph D Ayotte; Matthew O Gribble; Maria Argos
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 13.352

2.  Associations between private well water and community water supply arsenic concentrations in the conterminous United States.

Authors:  Maya Spaur; Melissa A Lombard; Joseph D Ayotte; David E Harvey; Benjamin C Bostick; Steven N Chillrud; Ana Navas-Acien; Anne E Nigra
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 10.753

3.  Global analysis and prediction of fluoride in groundwater.

Authors:  Joel Podgorski; Michael Berg
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 17.694

4.  Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in Groundwater Used as a Source of Drinking Water in the Eastern United States.

Authors:  Peter B McMahon; Andrea K Tokranov; Laura M Bexfield; Bruce D Lindsey; Tyler D Johnson; Melissa A Lombard; Elise Watson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Mapped Predictions of Manganese and Arsenic in an Alluvial Aquifer Using Boosted Regression Trees.

Authors:  Katherine J Knierim; James A Kingsbury; Kenneth Belitz; Paul E Stackelberg; Burke J Minsley; J R Rigby
Journal:  Ground Water       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 2.887

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.