OBJECTIVE: To compare wound complication rates after skin closure with staples and subcuticular suture in obese gynecology patients undergoing laparotomy through a midline vertical incision. METHODS: In this randomized controlled trial, women with body mass indexes (BMIs) of 30 or greater undergoing surgery by a gynecologic oncologist through a midline vertical incision were randomized to skin closure with staples or subcuticular 4-0 monofilament suture. The primary outcome was the rate of wound complication, defined as the presence of a wound breakdown, or infection, within 8 weeks postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included operative time, Stony Brook scar cosmetic score, and patient satisfaction. A sample size of 162 was planned to detect a 50% reduction in wound complications. At planned interim review (n=82), there was no significant difference in primary outcome. RESULTS:Between 2013 and 2016, 163 women were analyzed, including 84 who received staples and 79 suture. Women who received staples were older (mean age 59 compared with 57 years), hadlower mean BMI (37.3 compared with 38.9), and fewer benign indications for surgery (22 compared with 27). There were no differences in wound complication rates between staple compared with suture skin closure (28 [33%] compared with 25 [32%], relative risk 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.68-1.64). Women with staples reported worse median cosmetic scores (four of five compared with five of five, P<.001), darker scar color (37 [49%] compared with 13 [18%], relative risk 2.69, 95% CI 1.57-4.63), and more skin marks (30 [40%] compared with three [4%], relative risk 9.47, 95% CI 3.02-29.65) compared with women with suture closure. There was no group difference regarding satisfaction with their scar. Stepwise multivariate analysis revealed BMI (odds ratio [OR] 1.13, 95% CI 1.07-1.20), maximum postoperative glucose (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00-1.01), and cigarette smoking (OR 4.96, 95% CI 1.32-18.71) were correlates of wound complication. CONCLUSION: Closure of midline vertical skin incisions with subcuticular suture does not reduce surgical site wound complications compared with staples in obese gynecology patients. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01977612.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To compare wound complication rates after skin closure with staples and subcuticular suture in obese gynecology patients undergoing laparotomy through a midline vertical incision. METHODS: In this randomized controlled trial, women with body mass indexes (BMIs) of 30 or greater undergoing surgery by a gynecologic oncologist through a midline vertical incision were randomized to skin closure with staples or subcuticular 4-0 monofilament suture. The primary outcome was the rate of wound complication, defined as the presence of a wound breakdown, or infection, within 8 weeks postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included operative time, Stony Brook scar cosmetic score, and patient satisfaction. A sample size of 162 was planned to detect a 50% reduction in wound complications. At planned interim review (n=82), there was no significant difference in primary outcome. RESULTS: Between 2013 and 2016, 163 women were analyzed, including 84 who received staples and 79 suture. Women who received staples were older (mean age 59 compared with 57 years), had lower mean BMI (37.3 compared with 38.9), and fewer benign indications for surgery (22 compared with 27). There were no differences in wound complication rates between staple compared with suture skin closure (28 [33%] compared with 25 [32%], relative risk 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.68-1.64). Women with staples reported worse median cosmetic scores (four of five compared with five of five, P<.001), darker scar color (37 [49%] compared with 13 [18%], relative risk 2.69, 95% CI 1.57-4.63), and more skin marks (30 [40%] compared with three [4%], relative risk 9.47, 95% CI 3.02-29.65) compared with women with suture closure. There was no group difference regarding satisfaction with their scar. Stepwise multivariate analysis revealed BMI (odds ratio [OR] 1.13, 95% CI 1.07-1.20), maximum postoperative glucose (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00-1.01), and cigarette smoking (OR 4.96, 95% CI 1.32-18.71) were correlates of wound complication. CONCLUSION: Closure of midline vertical skin incisions with subcuticular suture does not reduce surgical site wound complications compared with staples in obese gynecology patients. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01977612.
Authors: Haider Mahdi; Anar Gojayev; Megan Buechel; Jason Knight; Janice SanMarco; David Lockhart; Chad Michener; Mehdi Moslemi-Kebria Journal: Int J Gynecol Cancer Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 3.437
Authors: Methodius G Tuuli; Roxane M Rampersad; Jeanine F Carbone; David Stamilio; George A Macones; Anthony O Odibo Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Abelardo Silva von Eckardstein; Chong H Lim; Pascal M Dohmen; Paulo M Pêgo-Fernandes; William A Cooper; Susan G Oslund; E Lynne Kelley Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2011-06-24 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Suzanne L Basha; Meredith L Rochon; Joanne N Quiñones; Kara M Coassolo; Orion A Rust; John C Smulian Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Elizabeth K Nugent; John T Hoff; Feng Gao; L Stewart Massad; Ashley Case; Israel Zighelboim; David G Mutch; Premal H Thaker Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2011-02-15 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: John Shepard; William Ward; Aaron Milstone; Taylor Carlson; John Frederick; Eric Hadhazy; Trish Perl Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Dana Figueroa; Victoria Chapman Jauk; Jeff M Szychowski; Rachel Garner; Joseph R Biggio; William W Andrews; John Hauth; Alan T N Tita Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Bryana Baginski; Regan Van Metre; Quinn Elliott; Jeremy A Warren; J Alex Ewing; William S Cobb; Alfredo M Carbonell Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2022-05-12 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Rachel L O'Donnell; Georgios Angelopoulos; James P Beirne; Ioannis Biliatis; Helen Bolton; Melissa Bradbury; Elaine Craig; Ketan Gajjar; Michelle L Mackintosh; Wendy MacNab; Thumuluru Kavitha Madhuri; Mark McComiskey; Eva Myriokefalitaki; Claire L Newton; Nithya Ratnavelu; Sian E Taylor; Amudha Thangavelu; Sarah A Rhodes; Emma J Crosbie; Richard J Edmondson; Yee-Loi Louise Wan Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-01-24 Impact factor: 2.692