IMPORTANCE: Surgical site infections (SSIs) may increase health care costs, but few studies have conducted an analysis from the perspective of hospital administrators. OBJECTIVE: To determine the change in hospital profit due to SSIs. DESIGN: Retrospective study of data from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2010. SETTING: The study was performed at 4 of The Johns Hopkins Health System acute care hospitals in Maryland: Johns Hopkins Bayview (560 beds); Howard County General Hospital (238 beds); The Johns Hopkins Hospital (946 beds); and Suburban Hospital (229 beds). PARTICIPANTS: Eligible patients for the study included those patients admitted to the 4 hospitals between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2010, with complete data and the correct International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision code, as determined by the infection preventionist. Infection preventionists performed complete medical record review using National Healthcare Safety Network definitions to identify SSIs. Patients were stratified using the All Patient Refined Diagnosis Related Groups to estimate the change in hospital profit due to SSIs. EXPOSURE: Surgical site infections. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The outcomes of the study were the difference in daily total charges, length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmission rate, and profit for patients with an SSI when compared with patients without an SSI. The hypothesis, formulated prior to data collection, that patients with an SSI have higher daily total costs, a longer LOS, and higher 30-day readmission rates than patients without an SSI, was tested using a nonpaired Mann-Whitney U test, an analysis of covariance, and a Pearson χ2 test. Hospital charges were used as a proxy for hospital cost. RESULTS The daily total charges, mean LOS, and 30-day readmission rate for patients with an SSI compared with patients without an SSI were $7493 vs $7924 (P = .99); 10.56 days vs 5.64 days (P < .001); and 51.94 vs 8.19 readmissions per 100 procedures (P < .001). The change in profit due SSIs was $2 268 589. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The data suggest that hospitals have a financial incentive to reduce SSIs, but hospitals should expect to see an increase in both cost and revenue when SSIs are reduced.
IMPORTANCE: Surgical site infections (SSIs) may increase health care costs, but few studies have conducted an analysis from the perspective of hospital administrators. OBJECTIVE: To determine the change in hospital profit due to SSIs. DESIGN: Retrospective study of data from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2010. SETTING: The study was performed at 4 of The Johns Hopkins Health System acute care hospitals in Maryland: Johns Hopkins Bayview (560 beds); Howard County General Hospital (238 beds); The Johns Hopkins Hospital (946 beds); and Suburban Hospital (229 beds). PARTICIPANTS: Eligible patients for the study included those patients admitted to the 4 hospitals between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2010, with complete data and the correct International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision code, as determined by the infection preventionist. Infection preventionists performed complete medical record review using National Healthcare Safety Network definitions to identify SSIs. Patients were stratified using the All Patient Refined Diagnosis Related Groups to estimate the change in hospital profit due to SSIs. EXPOSURE: Surgical site infections. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The outcomes of the study were the difference in daily total charges, length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmission rate, and profit for patients with an SSI when compared with patients without an SSI. The hypothesis, formulated prior to data collection, that patients with an SSI have higher daily total costs, a longer LOS, and higher 30-day readmission rates than patients without an SSI, was tested using a nonpaired Mann-Whitney U test, an analysis of covariance, and a Pearson χ2 test. Hospital charges were used as a proxy for hospital cost. RESULTS The daily total charges, mean LOS, and 30-day readmission rate for patients with an SSI compared with patients without an SSI were $7493 vs $7924 (P = .99); 10.56 days vs 5.64 days (P < .001); and 51.94 vs 8.19 readmissions per 100 procedures (P < .001). The change in profit due SSIs was $2 268 589. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The data suggest that hospitals have a financial incentive to reduce SSIs, but hospitals should expect to see an increase in both cost and revenue when SSIs are reduced.
Authors: Akihiro Yamada; Yuga Komaki; Nayan Patel; Fukiko Komaki; Arthur S Aelvoet; Anthony L Tran; Joel Pekow; Sushila Dalal; Russell D Cohen; Lisa Cannon; Konstantin Umanskiy; Radhika Smith; Roger Hurst; Neil Hyman; David T Rubin; Atsushi Sakuraba Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2017-07-18 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Lindsay M Kuroki; Mary M Mullen; L Stewart Massad; Ningying Wu; Jingxia Liu; David G Mutch; Matthew A Powell; Andrea R Hagemann; Premal H Thaker; Carolyn K McCourt; Akiva P Novetsky Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Jens Hachenberg; Christian Eichler; Ellen Acis; Maximilian Mattes Auer-Schmidt; Mathias Warm; Wolfram Malter; Fabinshy Thangarajah Journal: In Vivo Date: 2021 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.155
Authors: Manuel C Vallejo; Ahmed F Attaallah; Robert E Shapiro; Osama M Elzamzamy; Michael G Mueller; Warren S Eller Journal: J Anesth Date: 2016-10-12 Impact factor: 2.078
Authors: Uri P Dior; Shamitha Kathurusinghe; Claudia Cheng; Charlotte Reddington; Andrew J Daley; Catarina Ang; Martin Healey Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2020-09-01 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: David Cagney; Lydia Simmons; Donal Peter O'Leary; Mark Corrigan; Louise Kelly; M J O'Sullivan; Aaron Liew; Henry Paul Redmond Journal: World J Surg Date: 2020-05 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Gabriel J Pavey; Peter M Formby; Benjamin W Hoyt; Scott C Wagner; Jonathan A Forsberg; Benjamin K Potter Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2019-04 Impact factor: 4.176