Literature DB >> 10580621

The impact of surgical-site infections in the 1990s: attributable mortality, excess length of hospitalization, and extra costs.

K B Kirkland1, J P Briggs, S L Trivette, W E Wilkinson, D J Sexton.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine mortality, morbidity, and costs attributable to surgical-site infections (SSIs) in the 1990s.
DESIGN: A matched follow-up study of a cohort of patients with SSI, matched one-to-one with patients without SSI.
SETTING: A 415-bed community hospital. STUDY POPULATION: 255 pairs of patients with and without SSI were matched on age, procedure, National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance System risk index, date of surgery, and surgeon. OUTCOME MEASURES: Mortality, excess length of hospitalization, and extra direct costs attributable to SSI; relative risk for intensive care unit (ICU) admission and for readmission to the hospital.
RESULTS: Of the 255 pairs, 20 infected patients (7.8%) and 9 uninfected patients (3.5%) died during the postoperative hospitalization (relative risk [RR], 2.2; 95% confidence interval [CI95], 1.1-4.5). Seventy-four infected patients (29%) and 46 uninfected patients (18%) required ICU admission (RR, 1.6; CI95, 1.3-2.0). The median length of hospitalization was 11 days for infected patients and 6 days for uninfected patients. The extra hospital stay attributable to SSI was 6.5 days (CI95, 5-8 days). The median direct costs of hospitalization were $7,531 for infected patients and $3,844 for uninfected patients. The excess direct costs attributable to SSI were $3,089 (CI95, $2,139-$4,163). Among the 229 pairs who survived the initial hospitalization, 94 infected patients (41%) and 17 uninfected patients (7%) required readmission to the hospital within 30 days of discharge (RR, 5.5; CI95, 4.0-7.7). When the second hospitalization was included, the total excess hospitalization and direct costs attributable to SSI were 12 days and $5,038, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: In the 1990s, patients who develop SSI have longer and costlier hospitalizations than patients who do not develop such infections. They are twice as likely to die, 60% more likely to spend time in an ICU, and more than five times more likely to be readmitted to the hospital. Programs that reduce the incidence of SSI can substantially decrease morbidity and mortality and reduce the economic burden for patients and hospitals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10580621     DOI: 10.1086/501572

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol        ISSN: 0899-823X            Impact factor:   3.254


  315 in total

1.  Perioperative morbidity and mortality after anterior, posterior, and anterior/posterior spine fusion surgery.

Authors:  Stavros G Memtsoudis; Vassilios I Vougioukas; Yan Ma; Licia K Gaber-Baylis; Federico P Girardi
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Impact of surgical site infection after colorectal surgery on hospital stay and medical expenditure in Japan.

Authors:  Nobuichi Kashimura; Shinya Kusachi; Toshiro Konishi; Junzo Shimizu; Masato Kusunoki; Masaaki Oka; Toshiro Wakatsuki; Yoshinobu Sumiyama
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Risk factors for surgical site infections after elective gastrectomy.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Migita; Tomoyoshi Takayama; Sohei Matsumoto; Kohei Wakatsuki; Koji Enomoto; Tetsuya Tanaka; Masahiro Ito; Yoshiyuki Nakajima
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Commentary: centralized assessment in graduate medical education: how can it help us reinvent training?

Authors:  Paul Preston
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2009-09

5.  Surgical site infections in a tertiary health care center: prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Vesna Suljagić; Miodrag Jevtic; Boban Djordjevic; Aleksandra Jovelic
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 6.  Systematic review and cost analysis comparing use of chlorhexidine with use of iodine for preoperative skin antisepsis to prevent surgical site infection.

Authors:  Ingi Lee; Rajender K Agarwal; Bruce Y Lee; Neil O Fishman; Craig A Umscheid
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 3.254

7.  Back to basics--cutting the cord on umbilical infections.

Authors:  Alistair Sharples; David McArthur; Kate McNamara; John Lengyel
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Right colon, left colon, and rectal surgeries are not similar for surgical site infection development. Analysis of 277 elective and urgent colorectal resections.

Authors:  Luca Degrate; Mattia Garancini; Marta Misani; Silvia Poli; Cinzia Nobili; Fabrizio Romano; Laura Giordano; Vittorio Motta; Franco Uggeri
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Donor risk index predicts graft failure reliably but not post-transplant infections.

Authors:  Laura H Rosenberger; Jacob R Gillen; Tjasa Hranjec; Jayme B Stokes; Kenneth L Brayman; Sean C Kumer; Timothy M Schmitt; Robert G Sawyer
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 2.150

10.  Investigation of risk factors for surgical wound infection among teaching hospitals in Tehran.

Authors:  Kamran Soltani Arabshahi; Jalil Koohpayezade
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.