Literature DB >> 28593672

THE EVOLUTION OF FITNESS.

Austin Burt1.   

Abstract

In every generation, the mean fitness of populations increases because of natural selection and decreases because of mutations and changes in the environment. The magnitudes of these effects can be measured in two ways: either directly, by comparing the fitnesses of selected and unselected populations, or indirectly, by measuring the additive variance of fitness and making use of the fundamental theorem of natural selection. The available data suggest that the amount by which natural selection increases mean fitness each generation (or degradation decreases mean fitness) will usually be between 0.1% and 30%; more tentatively, it is suggested that values will typically fall between 1% and 10%. These values can be used to set an upper limit of 5%-10% on the genetic advantage of mate choice. © 1995 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fitness variation; fundamental theorem; mate choice; natural selection; quantitative genetics; sexual selection

Year:  1995        PMID: 28593672     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1995.tb05954.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  9 in total

1.  'Good-genes' and 'compatible-genes' effects in an Alpine whitefish and the information content of breeding tubercles over the course of the spawning season.

Authors:  Claus Wedekind; Guillaume Evanno; Davnah Urbach; Alain Jacob; Rudolf Müller
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-03-08       Impact factor: 1.082

Review 2.  Evolutionary rescue and the limits of adaptation.

Authors:  Graham Bell
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-19       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  The Linked Selection Signature of Rapid Adaptation in Temporal Genomic Data.

Authors:  Vince Buffalo; Graham Coop
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Behavior genetic modeling of human fertility: findings from a contemporary Danish Twin Study.

Authors:  J L Rodgers; H P Kohler; K O Kyvik; K Christensen
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2001-02

5.  Sexual selection, germline mutation rate and sperm competition.

Authors:  A P Møller; J J Cuervo
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2003-04-18       Impact factor: 3.260

6.  Good genes and sexual selection in dung beetles (Onthophagus taurus): genetic variance in egg-to-adult and adult viability.

Authors:  Francisco Garcia-Gonzalez; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Causes of maladaptation.

Authors:  Steven P Brady; Daniel I Bolnick; Amy L Angert; Andrew Gonzalez; Rowan D H Barrett; Erika Crispo; Alison M Derry; Christopher G Eckert; Dylan J Fraser; Gregor F Fussmann; Frederic Guichard; Thomas Lamy; Andrew G McAdam; Amy E M Newman; Antoine Paccard; Gregor Rolshausen; Andrew M Simons; Andrew P Hendry
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 5.183

8.  The quantitative genetics of fitness in a wild seabird.

Authors:  Maria Moiron; Anne Charmantier; Sandra Bouwhuis
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 4.171

9.  Is there indirect selection on female extra-pair reproduction through cross-sex genetic correlations with male reproductive fitness?

Authors:  Jane M Reid; Matthew E Wolak
Journal:  Evol Lett       Date:  2018-06-15
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.