| Literature DB >> 21267411 |
Francisco Garcia-Gonzalez1, Leigh W Simmons.
Abstract
Whether species exhibit significant heritable variation in fitness is central for sexual selection. According to good genes models there must be genetic variation in males leading to variation in offspring fitness if females are to obtain genetic benefits from exercising mate preferences, or by mating multiply. However, sexual selection based on genetic benefits is controversial, and there is limited unambiguous support for the notion that choosy or polyandrous females can increase the chances of producing offspring with high viability. Here we examine the levels of additive genetic variance in two fitness components in the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus. We found significant sire effects on egg-to-adult viability and on son, but not daughter, survival to sexual maturity, as well as moderate coefficients of additive variance in these traits. Moreover, we do not find evidence for sexual antagonism influencing genetic variation for fitness. Our results are consistent with good genes sexual selection, and suggest that both pre- and postcopulatory mate choice, and male competition could provide indirect benefits to females.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21267411 PMCID: PMC3022759 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016233
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Mixed model nested analyses of variance for egg-to-adult viability and adult male and female viability.
| Trait | Source of variance | df | F value | P value |
| Egg-to-adult viability | Sire | 35 | 1.62 | 0.044 |
| Dam (Sire) | 66 | 1.91 | ≪0.001 | |
| Residual | 1756 | |||
| Adult male viability | Sire | 35 | 1.85 | 0.017 |
| Dam (Sire) | 62 | 2.21 | ≪0.001 | |
| Residual | 616 | |||
| Adult female viability | Sire | 35 | 1.30 | 0.18 |
| Dam (Sire) | 61 | 2.22 | ≪0.001 | |
| Residual | 555 |
Satterthwaite's approximation of the error term to account for unequal sample sizes of offspring within sire (denominator's degrees of freedom, a: 70.32, b: 64.24, c: 61.89).
Descriptive phenotypic and genetic statistics for egg-to-adult viability and adult male and female viability.
| Trait | Mean | VA | VP | h2 sire (SE) | h2 dam (SE) | (pSire-Dam) | h2 gen. (SE) | CVA | CVP | CVR |
| Egg-to-adult viability | 0.73 | 0.012 | 0.195 | 0.11 (0.11) | 0.29 (0.13) | 0.397 | 0.20 (0.06) | 14.73 | 60.18 | 58.35 |
| Adult male viability | 0.69 | 0.067 | 0.218 | 0.52 (0.35) | 0.89 (0.24) | 0.505 | 0.70 (0.16) | 37.59 | 68.08 | 56.77 |
| Adult female viability | 0.67 | 0.027 | 0.223 | 0.20 (0.26) | 1.05 (0.33) | 0.134 | 0.63 (0.13) | 24.55 | 70.23 | 65.80 |
Mean is the mean proportion calculated as outlined by Roff ([20]; page 57). P-values for the difference between the sire and dam estimate following a t-test of paired sire and dam jackknife pseudovalues (pSire-Dam) are shown [27].