Literature DB >> 12702218

Sexual selection, germline mutation rate and sperm competition.

A P Møller1, J J Cuervo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An important component of sexual selection arises because females obtain viability benefits for their offspring from their mate choice. Females choosing extra-pair fertilization generally favor males with exaggerated secondary sexual characters, and extra-pair paternity increases the variance in male reproductive success. Furthermore, females are assumed to benefit from 'good genes' from extra-pair sires. How additive genetic variance in such viability genes is maintained despite strong directional selection remains an evolutionary enigma. We propose that sexual selection is associated with elevated mutation rates, changing the balance between mutation and selection, thereby increasing variance in fitness and hence the benefits to be obtained from good genes sexual selection. Two hypotheses may account for such elevated mutation: (1) Increased sperm production associated with sperm competition may increase mutation rate. (2) Mutator alleles increase mutation rates that are revealed by the expression of condition-dependent secondary sexual characters used by choosy females during their mate choice. M Petrie has independently developed the idea that mutator alleles may account for the maintenance of genetic variation in viability despite strong directional selection.
RESULTS: A comparative study of birds revealed a positive correlation between mutation rate at minisatellite loci and extra-pair paternity, but not between mutation rate and relative testes mass which is a measure of relative sperm production. Minisatellite mutation rates were not related to longevity, suggesting a meiotic rather than a mitotic origin of mutations.
CONCLUSION: We found evidence of increased mutation rate in species with more intense sexual selection. Increased mutation was not associated with increased sperm production, and we suggest that species with intense sexual selection may maintain elevated mutation rates because sexual selection continuously benefits viability alleles expressed in condition-dependent characters. Sexual selection may increase mutational input, which in turn feeds back on sexual selection because of increased variance in viability traits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12702218      PMCID: PMC156621          DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-3-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Evol Biol        ISSN: 1471-2148            Impact factor:   3.260


  30 in total

1.  Evolving evolvability.

Authors:  L Partridge; N H Barton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-09-28       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Sexual selection and the maintenance of sexual reproduction.

Authors:  A F Agrawal
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-06-07       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Sexual selection and the maintenance of sex.

Authors:  S Siller
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-06-07       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Beneficial mutations, hitchhiking and the evolution of mutation rates in sexual populations.

Authors:  T Johnson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Heritability of fitness in a wild mammal population.

Authors:  L E Kruuk; T H Clutton-Brock; J Slate; J M Pemberton; S Brotherstone; F E Guinness
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-01-18       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  THE EVOLUTION OF PLUMAGE BRIGHTNESS IN BIRDS IS RELATED TO EXTRAPAIR PATERNITY.

Authors:  A P Møller; T R Birkhead
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Lifetime Reproductive Success and Heritability in Nature.

Authors:  J Merilä; B C Sheldon
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.926

8.  Sexual selection resulting from extrapair paternity in collared flycatchers.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.844

9.  PERSPECTIVE: SPONTANEOUS DELETERIOUS MUTATION.

Authors:  Michael Lynch; Jeff Blanchard; David Houle; Travis Kibota; Stewart Schultz; Larissa Vassilieva; John Willis
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  The use of synthetic tandem repeats to isolate new VNTR loci: cloning of a human hypermutable sequence.

Authors:  G Vergnaud; D Mariat; F Apiou; A Aurias; M Lathrop; V Lauthier
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 5.736

View more
  11 in total

1.  Sexual selection, redundancy and survival of the most beautiful.

Authors:  R D Morris; J A Morris
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.826

Review 2.  Characteristics, causes and evolutionary consequences of male-biased mutation.

Authors:  Hans Ellegren
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Evolution of an avian pigmentation gene correlates with a measure of sexual selection.

Authors:  Nicola J Nadeau; Terry Burke; Nicholas I Mundy
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  The mitonuclear compatibility hypothesis of sexual selection.

Authors:  Geoffrey E Hill; James D Johnson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Sexual selection, body mass and molecular evolution interact to predict diversification in birds.

Authors:  Maider Iglesias-Carrasco; Michael D Jennions; Simon Y W Ho; David A Duchêne
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Experimental evidence for effects of sexual selection on condition-dependent mutation rates.

Authors:  Julian Baur; David Berger
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 15.460

7.  Rate and success of study replication in ecology and evolution.

Authors:  Clint D Kelly
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Minisatellite mutation rates increase with extra-pair paternity among birds.

Authors:  Anders P Møller; José J Cuervo
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  Sexual selection does not influence minisatellite mutation rate.

Authors:  William Amos
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-01-08       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  Programmed genetic instability: a tumor-permissive mechanism for maintaining the evolvability of higher species through methylation-dependent mutation of DNA repair genes in the male germ line.

Authors:  Yongzhong Zhao; Richard J Epstein
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 16.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.