Literature DB >> 23209162

Evolutionary rescue and the limits of adaptation.

Graham Bell1.   

Abstract

Populations subject to severe stress may be rescued by natural selection, but its operation is restricted by ecological and genetic constraints. The cost of natural selection expresses the limited capacity of a population to sustain the load of mortality or sterility required for effective selection. Genostasis expresses the lack of variation that prevents many populations from adapting to stress. While the role of relative fitness in adaptation is well understood, evolutionary rescue emphasizes the need to recognize explicitly the importance of absolute fitness. Permanent adaptation requires a range of genetic variation in absolute fitness that is broad enough to provide a few extreme types capable of sustained growth under a stress that would cause extinction if they were not present. This principle implies that population size is an important determinant of rescue. The overall number of individuals exposed to selection will be greater when the population declines gradually under a constant stress, or is progressively challenged by gradually increasing stress. In gradually deteriorating environments, survival at lethal stress may be procured by prior adaptation to sublethal stress through genetic correlation. Neither the standing genetic variation of small populations nor the mutation supply of large populations, however, may be sufficient to provide evolutionary rescue for most populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23209162      PMCID: PMC3538447          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  33 in total

Review 1.  Limits to natural selection.

Authors:  N Barton; L Partridge
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.345

2.  Evolutionary changes in heat-inducible gene expression in lines of Escherichia coli adapted to high temperature.

Authors:  Michelle M Riehle; Albert F Bennett; Richard E Lenski; Anthony D Long
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2003-06-24       Impact factor: 3.107

3.  The population genetics of adaptation: the adaptation of DNA sequences.

Authors:  H Allen Orr
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Genetics of natural populations. XXXI. Genetics of an isolated marginal population of Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  T DOBZHANSKY; A S HUNTER; O PAVLOVSKY; B SPASSKY; B WALLACE
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1963-01       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Evolutionary biology: the power of natural selection.

Authors:  Andrew P Hendry
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-02-17       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  The Croonian Lecture, 1991. Genostasis and the limits to evolution.

Authors:  A D Bradshaw
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1991-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Mutations of intermediate effect are responsible for adaptation in evolving Pseudomonas fluorescens populations.

Authors:  Rowan D H Barrett; R Craig MacLean; Graham Bell
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2006-06-22       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Adaptive walks toward a moving optimum.

Authors:  Sinéad Collins; Juliette de Meaux; Claudia Acquisti
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-04-15       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Distribution of fitness effects among beneficial mutations before selection in experimental populations of bacteria.

Authors:  Rees Kassen; Thomas Bataillon
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-03-19       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  Testing the extreme value domain of attraction for distributions of beneficial fitness effects.

Authors:  Craig J Beisel; Darin R Rokyta; Holly A Wichman; Paul Joyce
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-06-11       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  78 in total

1.  Evolutionary dynamics of recent selection on cognitive abilities.

Authors:  Sara E Miller; Andrew W Legan; Michael T Henshaw; Katherine L Ostevik; Kieran Samuk; Floria M K Uy; Michael J Sheehan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Homeostasis of redox status derived from glucose metabolic pathway could be the key to understanding the Warburg effect.

Authors:  Shiwu Zhang; Chuanwei Yang; Zhenduo Yang; Dan Zhang; Xiaoping Ma; Gordon Mills; Zesheng Liu
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2015-02-15       Impact factor: 6.166

Review 3.  Macroevolutionary patterns of salt tolerance in angiosperms.

Authors:  Lindell Bromham
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2014-11-30       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  News Feature: Probing the limits of "evolutionary rescue".

Authors:  Amy McDermott
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Evolution caused by extreme events.

Authors:  Peter R Grant; B Rosemary Grant; Raymond B Huey; Marc T J Johnson; Andrew H Knoll; Johanna Schmitt
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 6.  Physiological implications of ocean acidification for marine fish: emerging patterns and new insights.

Authors:  Andrew J Esbaugh
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 2.200

7.  Testing the Role of Multicopy Plasmids in the Evolution of Antibiotic Resistance.

Authors:  Jose Antonio Escudero; R Craig MacLean; Alvaro San Millan
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 1.355

8.  How does parental environment influence the potential for adaptation to global change?

Authors:  Evatt Chirgwin; Dustin J Marshall; Carla M Sgrò; Keyne Monro
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Exploring evolution of maximum growth rates in plankton.

Authors:  Kevin J Flynn; David O F Skibinski
Journal:  J Plankton Res       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 2.455

10.  The genomic landscape of rapid repeated evolutionary adaptation to toxic pollution in wild fish.

Authors:  Noah M Reid; Dina A Proestou; Bryan W Clark; Wesley C Warren; John K Colbourne; Joseph R Shaw; Sibel I Karchner; Mark E Hahn; Diane Nacci; Marjorie F Oleksiak; Douglas L Crawford; Andrew Whitehead
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 47.728

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.