Literature DB >> 28588563

Insight into Potential Probiotic Markers Predicted in Lactobacillus pentosus MP-10 Genome Sequence.

Hikmate Abriouel1, Beatriz Pérez Montoro1, Carlos S Casimiro-Soriguer2, Antonio J Pérez Pulido2, Charles W Knapp3, Natacha Caballero Gómez1, Sonia Castillo-Gutiérrez4, María D Estudillo-Martínez4, Antonio Gálvez1, Nabil Benomar1.   

Abstract

Lactobacillus pentosus MP-10 is a potential probiotic lactic acid bacterium originally isolated from naturally fermented Aloreña green table olives. The entire genome sequence was annotated to in silico analyze the molecular mechanisms involved in the adaptation of L. pentosus MP-10 to the human gastrointestinal tract (GIT), such as carbohydrate metabolism (related with prebiotic utilization) and the proteins involved in bacteria-host interactions. We predicted an arsenal of genes coding for carbohydrate-modifying enzymes to modify oligo- and polysaccharides, such as glycoside hydrolases, glycoside transferases, and isomerases, and other enzymes involved in complex carbohydrate metabolism especially starch, raffinose, and levan. These enzymes represent key indicators of the bacteria's adaptation to the GIT environment, since they involve the metabolism and assimilation of complex carbohydrates not digested by human enzymes. We also detected key probiotic ligands (surface proteins, excreted or secreted proteins) involved in the adhesion to host cells such as adhesion to mucus, epithelial cells or extracellular matrix, and plasma components; also, moonlighting proteins or multifunctional proteins were found that could be involved in adhesion to epithelial cells and/or extracellular matrix proteins and also affect host immunomodulation. In silico analysis of the genome sequence of L. pentosus MP-10 is an important initial step to screen for genes encoding for proteins that may provide probiotic features, and thus provides one new routes for screening and studying this potentially probiotic bacterium.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aloreña table olives; Lactobacillus pentosus; carbohydrate metabolism; host interaction; in silico analysis; probiotics

Year:  2017        PMID: 28588563      PMCID: PMC5439011          DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00891

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Microbiol        ISSN: 1664-302X            Impact factor:   5.640


Introduction

The Lactobacillus genus belongs to the LAB group, which currently comprises of 222 species described in List of Prokaryotic Names with Standing in Nomenclature “LPSN”[1] (February 2017). In this context, Lactobacillus represents a highly heterogeneous taxonomic group encompassing species with various physiological, biochemical and genetic characteristics that reflect their capacity to colonize many ecological niches and to respond to several environmental stresses (De Angelis and Gobbetti, 2004; Pot et al., 2014). Lactobacilli have been isolated from different sources [e.g., plants, foods, and the mucosal surfaces (i.e., from oral, gastrointestinal, and reproductive tracts) of mammalian hosts], and they have widely been used as starter cultures in food fermentations, due to their safe-history of use, and also as protective cultures because of their production of antimicrobial substances (e.g., bacteriocins, peroxide, diacetyl, among others) (Leroy and de Vuyst, 1999; Heller, 2001; Hansen, 2002; Holzapfel, 2002; Giraffa et al., 2010; Franz et al., 2011; Garrigues et al., 2013). Thus, the Food and Drug Administration and European Food Safety Authority certify some Lactobacillus species as Generally Recognized As Safe (GRAS) or having a Qualified Presumption of Safety (QPS), respectively (Bernardeau et al., 2008). Furthermore, many Lactobacillus species represent main components of the global probiotic market: L. acidophilus, L. bulgaricus, L. plantarum, L. brevis, L. reuteri, L. johnsonii, L. casei, L. rhamnosus, and L. salivarius. Specifically, some L. pentosus strains have exerted probiotic effects such as the acceleration of IgA secretion in saliva and the enhancement of IgA production in the small intestine (Kotani et al., 2010; Izumo et al., 2011), which have aroused great interest due to vegetal origin (Pérez Montoro et al., 2016). Generic mechanisms for underlying probiotic effects can be linked to taxonomic groups (genus or species); however, specific mechanisms tend to be strain-specific (Hill et al., 2014). As such, whole genome sequencing (WGS) remains the best way to better understand the genetic and metabolic potential of each species/strain, to demonstrate the plasticity of their phylogenetic relationships, metabolic pathways, adaptation, fitness and safety (Jolley and Maiden, 2010; Maiden et al., 2013). Lactobacillus pentosus MP-10 is a potential probiotic LAB isolated from naturally fermented Aloreña green table olives (Abriouel et al., 2011) and has exhibited several probiotic capacities when tested in vitro such as good growth and survival capacities under simulated gastro-intestinal conditions, ability to auto-aggregate, and co-aggregate with pathogenic bacteria, adherence to intestinal and vaginal cell lines, antagonistic activity against pathogens and fermentation of several prebiotics and lactose (Pérez Montoro et al., 2016). However, the putative health-promoting capacities of this strain may depend on genetic characteristics and the interactions within its ecological niche (O’Sullivan et al., 2009); for this reason, the whole-genome sequence obtained by Abriouel et al. (2016) and the subsequent annotation will improve our knowledge about the functionality of this strain, its adaptation to the human gastrointestinal tract (GIT) and its interaction within the host. As such, we carried out in silico analysis of L. pentosus MP-10’s carbohydrate metabolism and the factors that affect their interaction with the host with the aim to identify genes as potential probiotic markers.

Results and Discussion

General Metabolic Features of a Probiotic Lactobacillus pentosus MP-10

Figure shows the frequency of KEGG functional annotations obtained by BlastKOALA (KEGG tool; last updated March 4, 2016), which assigned approximately half (45.7%) of the genes to KEGG annotations corresponding to environmental information processing (443 genes), genetic information processing (413 genes), carbohydrate metabolism (279), amino acid metabolism (173), cellular processes (164 genes), nucleotide metabolism (90 genes), energy metabolism (87 genes), metabolism of cofactors and vitamins (87 genes), human disease factors (70 genes), lipid metabolism (62 genes), among others. BlastKOALA results of functional categories predicted in . To highlight the molecular mechanisms involved in the adaptation of L. pentosus MP-10 to the human GIT, we focused the in silico analysis on carbohydrate metabolism related to prebiotic utilization and the proteins involved in host interactions, since the adaptation of probiotics is mainly represented by the enrichment of mucus-binding proteins and enzymes involved in breakdown of complex carbohydrates (Ventura et al., 2012). In silico analysis has some limitations related with the prediction accuracy which in turn depends on the algorithm used and the phenotype data from experiments (Ng and Henikoff, 2006); however, to avoid incorrect predictions all the annotations made in the present study were curated manually.

Carbohydrate Metabolism Related with Prebiotic Utilization

Over 8% of the identified genes in L. pentosus MP-10 genome are involved in carbohydrate metabolism (279 of 3558 genes), which is similar to the most-studied bifidobacterial genomes and 30% higher than other gastrointestinal (GIT)-resident bacteria (Ventura et al., 2009). The abundance of carbohydrate metabolism genes in L. pentosus MP-10 is important with respect to its possible adaptation to the microhabitats of gastrointestinal environment and its interaction with human host, and thus may enhance its survival, competitiveness and persistence. Lactobacillus pentosus MP-10 is a facultatively hetero-fermentative LAB, and its genome possesses genes for both the phosphoketolase and Embden-Meyerhof pathways (EMP). Thus, it can potentially ferment carbohydrates mainly via the EMP, utilizing glucose, and converting it to pyruvate and then to lactate (glycolysis). However, in the absence of six-carbon sugars (e.g., glucose, et al.), L. pentosus MP-10 would possibly ferment five-carbon carbohydrates such as xylose, xylulose, arabinose, or ribose via the phosphoketolase pathway (PK), as reported for other L. pentosus strains (Bustos et al., 2005). Analysis by BlastKOALA indicated that EMP (complete pathway), pentose phosphate pathway (PP) (both oxidative and non-oxidative complete pathways), and galactose degradation pathway (complete Leloir pathway) form the central core of carbohydrate metabolism in L. pentosus MP-10; however, the Entner-Doudoroff pathway (ED) appears incomplete. Lactobacillus pentosus MP-10 has been shown to be able to ferment in vitro a variety of carbohydrates such as glucose, galactose, fructose, lactose, saccharose, and lactulose (Pérez Montoro et al., 2016). In silico analysis of the annotated genome sequence of L. pentosus MP-10 also predicted its capacity to ferment several simple carbohydrates of both five-carbon and six-carbon sugars such as mannose, inositol, ribose, arabinose, rhamnose, maltose, xylose, xylulose, and trehalose; furthermore, we also predicted its ability to use complex carbohydrates such as cellulose, xylan (hemicellulose), starch, raffinose, chitin, and levan (Figure ). These carbohydrates can either be dietary compounds or carbon sources derived from the metabolism of the gastrointestinal microbiota (Korakli et al., 2002). Ultimately, 15 carbohydrate utilization pathways were predicted in L. pentosus MP-10 genome sequence: glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, citrate cycle, PP pathway, pentose, and glucuronate interconversions, fructose and mannose metabolism, galactose metabolism, ascorbate, and aldarate metabolism, starch and sucrose metabolism, amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism, pyruvate metabolism, glyoxylate and dicarboxylate metabolism, propanoate metabolism, butanoate metabolism, C5-branched dibasic acid metabolism and inositol phosphate metabolism. As such, the wide repertoire of enzymes involved in the fermentation of various carbohydrate substrates is reflected in its relatively large genome size, which is also corroborated by the significantly abundant number of genes for the phosphoenolpyruvate- (PEP) dependent sugar phosphotransferase system (PTS) (77 genes) and the presence of specific genes or gene clusters involved in carbohydrate utilization by L. pentosus MP-10. Organization of gene clusters encoding proteins predicted to be involved in carbohydrate utilization as prebiotics by (A) Pathway reconstruction as predicted by genome annotation: PTS (phosphotransferase system), red; MFS (Major Facilitator Superfamily), yellow; ABC Transporter, green; GRP (Glucose/Ribose Porter Family), orange. (B) Genetic loci of interest: Ara, arabinose; Cellu, cellulose; Chit, chitin; Fru, fructose; Glu, glucose; Inos, inositol; Lac, lactosegalactose loci; Lev, levan; Mal, maltose; Man, mannose; Raff, raffinose; Rha, rhamnose; Rib, ribose; Star, starch; Suc, sucrose; Tre, trehalose; Xyl, xylose; Xyla, xylan; Xylul, xylulose. The possible adaptation and enrichment of L. pentosus MP-10 in GIT could be predicted by the presence of genes encoding various carbohydrate-modifying enzymes able to modify oligo- and polysaccharides. These enzymes are produced by intestinal microbial communities and are required for the metabolism of plant- and host-derived carbohydrates (e.g., cellulose, xylan, and pectin), since mammals have limited evolved abilities to hydrolyze complex polysaccharides for digestion (Cantarel et al., 2012). Among these enzymes, many were predicted in L. pentosus MP-10 genome and belong to several CAZY “Carbohydrate-Active Enzymes” families (Table ): glycoside hydrolases or glycosylases (15 genes); hexosyl- (15 genes), pentosyl- (13 genes) and phospho-transferases (13 genes); and also isomerases (24 genes). Putative carbohydrate-modifying enzymes identified in the genome sequence of Lactobacillus pentosus MP-10. Furthermore, the presence of sugar ABC transporters, carbohydrate esterases, glycosyl transferases, polysaccharide lyases, permeases, and PEP-PTS (PEP; PTS) components required for the uptake and metabolism of plant and host-derived carbohydrates were predicted in the L. pentosus MP-10 genome, as similarly reported for the probiotic Bifidobacterium (Kim et al., 2009). This arsenal of genes coding for carbohydrate-modifying enzymes predicted in L. pentosus MP-10 genome could represent a key indicator of this bacterium’s adaptation to the GIT environment, as these genes are involved in the metabolism and transport of carbohydrates non-digestible by human enzymes. Glycosyl (hexosyl-, pentosyl-, and phospho-) transferases are involved in the biosynthesis of disaccharides, oligosaccharides and polysaccharides by transferring sugar moieties from an activated donor to a specific substrate (Lairson et al., 2008); the resulting glycoconjugates (as part of the glycome) play an important role in the establishment of environment- and host-specific interactions (Kay et al., 2010). Glycoside hydrolases are able to hydrolyze the glycosidic bond between two or more carbohydrates, and also between carbohydrate and non-carbohydrate moieties. The most common predicted genes found in L. pentosus MP-10 were coding for oligo-1,6-glucosidase, beta-galactosidase, alpha-L-rhamnosidase, and 6-phospho-beta-glucosidase among others (with several GH families), playing a key role not only in carbohydrate hydrolysis but also their action as retaining enzymes involved in the synthesis of oligosaccharides that may be selectively used as prebiotics by L. pentosus MP-10 and other gastrointestinal probiotic bacteria (Table ). Regarding isomerases, we observed several carbohydrate isomerases involved in the glycolytic pathway; however, the presence of different copies of phosphoglycerate mutase may indicate that gene-products may accomplish other functions as a moonlighting protein (Candela et al., 2007).

Complex Carbohydrate Metabolism

Lactobacillus pentosus MP-10 has the capacity to metabolize complex carbohydrates (e.g., starch, cellulose, galactan, xylan, pullulan, pectins, and gums). For example, glycogen metabolism plays an important role in survival and fitness of LAB in their ecological niche by contributing to cellular processes such as carbohydrate metabolism, energy production, stress response, and cell–cell communication (Eydallin et al., 2007, 2010). The glycogen metabolism operon (glg) predicted in L. pentosus MP-10 is encoded by a 9608-base chromosomal region and consists of glgBCDAP-apu genes (XX999_00114 to XX999_00119), which are co-transcribed as polycistronic mRNA (Table ). The organization of the core genes (glgBCDAP) is identical to many bacteria, with the exception of two additional glycogen synthase genes exclusive to L. pentosus MP-10 (XX999_01233 and XX999_02081) which are homologous with Bacillus subtilis 168 and Mycobacterium tuberculosis CDC 1551, respectively (Table ). Furthermore, genes amyB and pgcA coding for alpha-amylase 2 and phosphoglucomutase, respectively, are distantly located from the glg operon (Table and Figure ). According to Goh and Klaenhammer (2014), the glycogen gene cluster organization might differ depending on the bacterial species and origin; in this study, the glycogen gene cluster is composed of glgBCDAP-apu-amyB-pgcA genes and the other two glycogen synthase genes (XX999_01233 and XX999_02081). Glycogen metabolism is predicted as an additional trait in L. pentosus MP-10, as it will contribute to probiotic activities and the retention of this bacterium in highly competitive and dynamic niches, such as the gastrointestinal environment, similarly as the probiotic L. acidophilus (Goh and Klaenhammer, 2013). The presence of more than one glycogen synthase gene in L. pentosus MP-10 indicates the capacity of these bacteria to store carbohydrates in the form of glycogen. Genes necessary for the glycogen metabolism in Lactobacillus pentosus MP-10 isolated from naturally fermented Aloreña table olives. Lactobacillus pentosus MP-10 possesses genes predicted as levansucrase (levS_1, levS_2, levS_3, and levS_4) with identities ranging from 44.07 to 62.4% with levS gene from L. sanfranciscensis (Table ; Rhee et al., 2002; Tieking et al., 2005), which are responsible for levan polymers [fructan polymers composed of β(2,6)-linked fructose units] and the fructo-oligosaccharide (FOS) 1-kestose production with prebiotic effects. This bacterium is capable to produce levan [with β-2,6 glycosidic bonds, produced by levansucrases (E.C. 2.4.1.10)] but not inulin-fructan types as no inulosucrase genes were detected in L. pentosus MP-10 genome. This is the first report of levansucrase in L. pentosus; this enzyme has only been reported in other LAB (L. sanfranciscensis L. reuteri, L. johnsonii, L. gasseri, L. crispatus, L. plantarum, L delbrueckii, and L. vaginalis among others). Alignments of the amino acid sequence of LevS proteins of L. pentosus MP-10 (LevS1, LvS2, LevS3, and LevS4) with levansucrase proteins of other lactic acid bacteria revealed less similarity and formed a separate cluster in the phylogenetic tree (Figure ). Genes necessary for complex carbohydrate metabolism in Lactobacillus pentosus MP-10 isolated from naturally fermented Aloreña table olives. Phylogenetic relationships of The sequences were aligned and the most parsimonious phylogenetic trees were constructed using the CLUSTAL W of Lasergene program, version 14 (MegAlign 14, Inc., Madison, WI, USA). The scale below indicates the number of amino acid substitutions. Accession numbers are indicated in parentheses. Regarding other enzymes involved in complex carbohydrate degradation, we found genes coding for a protein similar to chitooligosaccharide deacetylase of E. coli K12 and beta-hexosaminidase involved in chitin degradation pathway as part of glycan degradation. Further, several genes coding for enzymes involved in the degradation of plant structural polysaccharides such as cellulose, ß-glucan, and xylan were predicted in L. pentosus MP-10 genome (Table ). In this context, a gene coding for a protein similar to cellulase/esterase CelE from Clostridium thermocellum ATCC 27405, which is a multifunctional enzyme involved in the degradation of plant cell wall polysaccharides, was identified in L. pentosus MP-10 genome necessary for cellulose and xylan digestion by both human and animals (Table ). Moreover, endo-1,4-beta-xylanase, acetylxylan esterase (three genes) and polysaccharide deacetylase were predicted in L. pentosus MP-10 genome sequence being involved in xylan catabolic pathway. Alpha-galactosidase coding gene was also detected in L. pentosus MP-10 genome sequence and is involved in raffinose degradation (Table ), which was previously shown in vitro by Pérez Montoro et al. (2016). Furthermore, L. pentosus MP-10 also had genes coding for cellulose synthase (two genes exclusive to L. pentosus MP-10 and two other genes) involved in cellulose synthesis (Table ), which could accumulate cellulose on the cell wall surface as an extracellular matrix for cell adhesion and biofilm formation to protect the bacteria. Cellulose production has been reported in lactic acid bacteria (Adetunji and Adegoke, 2007); however, no reports were found of cellulase production, although some Lactobacillus sp. genomes exhibit cellulase genes such as L. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus CNCM I-1519 (UniProtKB-G6F519) and L. plantarum (UniProtKB – A0A1C9HK74). For probiotic bacteria, such as E. coli Nissle 1917, cellulose production is required for adhesion of bacteria to the gastrointestinal epithelial cell line HT-29, to the mouse epithelium in vivo, and for enhanced cytokine production (Monteiro et al., 2009). Thus, the role of cellulose production in L. pentosus MP-10 must be investigated in depth. Overall, the repertoire of enzymes coding genes identified in L. pentosus MP-10 genome highlight the attractiveness of this bacterium as potential probiotic for human and animal.

Molecular Mechanisms Involved in the Interaction with the Host

Probiotic lactobacilli can mimic the same mechanisms used by the pathogens in the colonization process, thus they can express cell surface proteins such as key probiotic ligands that interact with host receptors resulting in several probiotic effects—thus inducing signaling pathways in the host (Voltan et al., 2008). The identification and characterization of these proteins, often strain-specific, involved in the molecular communication or interaction with the host are necessary to evaluate a priori the probiotic potential of Lactobacillus sp. candidates. Here, the possible interaction between L. pentosus MP-10 and the intestinal host cells, the target of most interactions with probiotics (Lebeer et al., 2010), may be bioinformatically predicted from the genome sequence. For example, several extracellular proteins (reviewed by Sánchez et al., 2008) were predicted in L. pentosus MP-10 to be involved in mucus adhesion: MucBP domain protein (codified by two genes determined in this study), lipoprotein signal peptidase (lspA gene) and moonlighting proteins such as glutamine-binding periplasmic protein (glnH genes) and elongation factor Tu (tuf gene) (Table ). The high genetic heterogeneity of MucBP proteins among Lactobacillus species (and strains) was reported by Mackenzie et al. (2010) for MUB and MUB-like proteins in L. reuteri. MucBP domain proteins are bacterial peptidoglycan-bound proteins, which are ligands or effector molecules contributing to specific properties such as adherence to the host, auto-aggregation and/or co-aggregation with pathogenic bacteria (Pérez Montoro et al., 2016)—as reported by Mackenzie et al. (2010) for MUB in L. reuteri. However, this should be further investigated for L. pentosus MP-10 under different conditions. Adhesion to mucus has been attributed to other molecules such as the Lactobacillus surface protein A (LspA), reported as mucus binding protein in L. salivarius UCC118 (van Pijkeren et al., 2006), which was also found in L. pentosus MP-10 (Table ). Mucus binding proteins in L. pentosus MP-10 may have a dual role: (1) being involved in the adhesion of this bacterium to the host cells and thus reinforcing the protection of the mucosal barrier and the competitive exclusion of pathogens, and (2) these proteins could also be implicated in the induction of mucin secretion by the host as reported for other lactobacilli (Mack et al., 2003). These finding are corroborated by the fact that L. pentosus MP-10 was able to adhere to Caco-2 and HeLa 229 cell lines and also co-aggregate with different pathogens (Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Listeria innocua, and Salmonella Enteritidis) (Pérez Montoro et al., 2016) by means of cell-wall surface molecules. However, further studies are required to demonstrate the target cell-wall surface molecules involved in such adhesion to intestinal cells. Genes coding for extracellular proteins with roles in adhesion or interaction with the host as predicted from genome annotation of Lactobacillus pentosus MP-10 isolated from naturally fermented Aloreña table olives. Other proteins predicted to be involved in adhesion to epithelial cells or extracellular matrix include: poly-beta-1,6-N-acetyl-D-glucosamine synthase, collagen binding protein, manganese ABC transporter substrate-binding lipoprotein precursor and moonlighting proteins such as elongation factor Tu, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, 10 and 60 kDa chaperonins, enolase, 2 glutamine synthetase, and glucose-6-phosphate isomerase (Table ). The poly-beta-1,6-N-acetyl-D-glucosamine synthase encoded by L. pentosus MP-10 was similar to E. coli K12 (33.89% identity), and it has been reported to be a surface polysaccharide involved in biofilm formation by this strain (Matthysse et al., 2008). However, the role of this protein in lactobacilli has not been determined. Furthermore, we predicted the presence of collagen-binding protein specific to L. pentosus MP-10, which could be involved in their adhesion to epithelial cells/extracellular matrix proteins similarly as shown other lactobacilli such as L. reuteri NCIB 11951 (Roos et al., 1996) and L. fermentum RC-14 (Heinemann et al., 2000). Thus, this could be of vital importance for effective colonization and also competitive displacement of gut pathogens (Yadav et al., 2013). On the other hand, the manganese ABC transporter substrate-binding lipoprotein precursor predicted in L. pentosus MP-10, similar to Streptococcus pneumoniae ATCC BAA-334 (51.96% identity), has been described as an important factor in pathogenesis and infection, since it acts as an adhesin involved on adherence to extracellular matrix (Dintilhac et al., 1997). Furthermore, the manganese ABC transporter substrate-binding lipoprotein precursor has also been detected in different Lactobacillus sp. such as L. plantarum, L. rhamnosus, and L. delbrueckii among others being involved in cell adhesion (UniprotKB). The moonlighting proteins, or multifunctional proteins such as elongation factor Tu and chaperonin GroEL, have been involved in the adhesion to epithelial cells and/or extracellular matrix proteins and also in host immunomodulation in L. johnsonii NCC 533 (Granato et al., 2004; Bergonzelli et al., 2006; Sánchez et al., 2008), while α-enolase has been involved in adhesion to epithelial cells and/or extracellular matrix proteins and also plasma components in L. crispatus ST1 (Antikainen et al., 2007). Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase and phosphoglycerate mutase have been involved in the adhesion to plasma components in L. crispatus ST2 (Antikainen et al., 2007; Candela et al., 2007). Furthermore, Kainulainen et al. (2012) showed that glutamine synthetase and glucose-6-phosphate isomerase have also been involved in adhesion to epithelial cells. However, the role of these moonlighting proteins in L. pentosus MP-10 has not yet been determined, requiring for this purpose further mutation or proteomic studies.

Conclusion

Lactobacillus pentosus MP-10 has harbored in its genome several genes putatively involved in their adaptation to the human GIT—particularly those involved in carbohydrate metabolism related to prebiotic utilization, and also the proteins involved in the interaction with host tissues. Enzymes involved in carbohydrate modification and complex-carbohydrate metabolism are highly represented in L. pentosus MP-10 genome, which may enhance their survival, competitiveness, and persistence in a competitive GIT niche. Furthermore, we found genes encoding mucus-binding proteins—involved in the adhesion to mucus, epithelial cells or extracellular matrix, to plasma components—and also moonlighting proteins, or multifunctional proteins, predicted to be involved in their adhesion to epithelial cells and/or extracellular matrix proteins and also involved in host immunomodulation. In conclusion, in silico analysis of the L. pentosus MP-10 genome sequence highlights the attractiveness of this bacterium as a potential probiotic for human and animal hosts, and offers opportunities for further investigation of novel routes for screening and studying these bacteria.

Materials and Methods

Genomic DNA Sequence of L. pentosus MP-10

The complete genome sequence of L. pentosus MP-10, obtained by using PacBio RS II technology (Abriouel et al., 2016) and deposited at the EMBL Nucleotide Sequence Database under accession numbers FLYG01000001 to FLYG01000006, was annotated as described by Abriouel et al. (in press). Briefly, the assembled genome sequences were annotated using the Prokka annotation pipeline, version 1.11 (Seemann, 2014), which predicted tRNA, rRNA, and mRNA genes and signal peptides in the sequences using Aragorn, RNAmmer, Prodigal, and SignalP, respectively (Laslett and Canback, 2004; Lagesen et al., 2007; Hyatt et al., 2010).

In Silico Analysis of Carbohydrate Metabolism in L. pentosus MP-10

The annotated genome sequence was used to detect the putative genes involved in carbohydrate metabolism, their products, and the associated GO terms. Furthermore, the carbohydrate metabolic pathways were reconstructed by using BlastKOALA (last update March 4, 2016) as part of the KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genome) tool in the pathway database[2] for annotating genomes; here, we used the annotated genes predicted in L. pentosus MP-10 genome as the input query.

In Silico Analysis of Proteins Involved in Interaction with Host

The annotated genome sequence was screened for mucus-binding proteins, proteins involved in adhesion to epithelial/extracellular matrix proteins, plasma components, and host immunomodulation as described in the literature (Roos et al., 1996; Heinemann et al., 2000; Granato et al., 2004; Bergonzelli et al., 2006; van Pijkeren et al., 2006; Antikainen et al., 2007; Candela et al., 2007; Sánchez et al., 2008; Mackenzie et al., 2010; Kainulainen et al., 2012).

Author Contributions

HA, NB, CK, and AG drafted the manuscript. HA, NB, BPM, CC-S, APP, NCG, SC-G, and ME-M analyzed the data; All authors discussed the results, commented on the manuscript, and approved the final version.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Table 1

Putative carbohydrate-modifying enzymes identified in the genome sequence of Lactobacillus pentosus MP-10.

EnzymeGeneGene IDEC numberCAZy Family
HexosyltransferasesGlycogen phosphorylaseglgPXX999_00118EC:2.4.1.1GT35
Maltose phosphorylasemapAXX999_00299EC:2.4.1.8GH65
Cellulose synthase (UDP-forming)bcsAXX999_01782EC:2.4.1.12GT6
1,4-alpha-glucan branching enzyme∗∗glgBXX999_01507EC:2.4.1.18GH13, GH57
Starch synthase∗∗glgAXX999_00114EC:2.4.1.21GT5
Poly(glycerol-phosphate) alpha-glucosyltransferasetagEXX999_00117EC:2.4.1.52GT4
Alpha, alpha-trehalose phosphorylaseE2.4.1.64XX999_01349EC:2.4.1.64GH65
Peptidoglycan glycosyltransferasepbp2AXX999_01350EC:2.4.1.129GT51
N-acetylglucosaminyldiphosphoundecaprenoltagAXX999_02448EC:2.4.1.187
N-acetyl-beta-D-mannosaminyltransferaseXX999_02762
XX999_02763
murGEC:2.4.1.227GT28
EC:2.4.1.337
Undecaprenyldiphospho-muramoylpentapeptide beta-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferasebgsBXX999_03361EC:2.4.1.–GH1, GH3, GH5, GH13, GH16, GH17, GH20, GH27, GH31, GH32, GH33, GH35, GH39, GH65, GH70, GH72, GH94, GH112, GH130
rfaBXX999_01483EC:2.4.1.– 3.4.–.–
1,2-diacylglycerol 3-alpha-glucosyltransferasemrcAXX999_00670EC:2.4.1.–
UDP-D-galactose:(glucosyl)LPS alpha-1,6-D-galactosyltransferase∗∗icaAXX999_02161EC:2.4.1.–GH1, GH3, GH5, GH13, GH16, GH17, GH20, GH27, GH31, GH32, GH33, GH35, GH39, GH65, GH70, GH72, GH94, GH112, GH130
cpoAXX999_01307
XX999_01219
GH1, GH3, GH5, GH13, GH16, GH17, GH20, GH27, GH31, GH32, GH33, GH35, GH39, GH65, GH70, GH72, GH94, GH112, GH130
XX999_01806
Penicillin-binding protein 1A∗∗
GH1, GH3, GH5, GH13, GH16, GH17, GH20, GH27, GH31, GH32, GH33, GH35, GH39, GH65, GH70, GH72, GH94, GH112, GH130
Poly-beta-1,6-N-acetyl-D-glucosamine synthase∗∗XX999_01594
1,2-diacylglycerol-3-alpha-glucose alpha-1,2-galactosyltransferase∗∗XX999_01308
PentosyltransferasesAdenine phosphoribosyltransferaseaptXX999_01330EC:2.4.2.7GH10
Hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferasehptXX999_02067EC:2.4.2.8GH10
Uracil phosphoribosyltransferaseuppXX999_00627EC:2.4.2.9GH10
Pyrimidine operon attenuation protein/uracil phosphoribosyltransferasepyrRXX999_02348EC:2.4.2.9GH10
Orotate phosphoribosyltransferasepyrEXX999_01829EC:2.4.2.10GH10
AmidophosphoribosyltransferasepurFXX999_02638EC:2.4.2.14GH10
ATP phosphoribosyltransferasehisGXX999_02631EC:2.4.2.17GH10
Anthranilate phosphoribosyltransferasetrpDXX999_02648EC:2.4.2.18GH10
Xanthine phosphoribosyltransferasexptXX999_02513EC:2.4.2.22GH10
tRNA-guanosine34 transglycosylasetgtXX999_01714EC:2.4.2.29GH10
triphosphoribosyl-dephospho-CoA synthasecitGXX999_01169EC:2.4.2.52
Glutamine amidotransferase∗∗hisHXX999_02268EC:2.4.2.-GH10
S-adenosylmethionine :tRNA ribosyltransferase-isomerasequeAXX999_01135EC:2.4.99.17
XX999_02510
XX999_02269
PhosphotransferasesGlucokinaseglkXX999_01642EC:2.7.1.2
FructokinasescrKXX999_00302EC:2.7.1.4
RhamnulokinaserhaBXX999_03099EC:2.7.1.5
GalactokinasegalKXX999_03468EC:2.7.1.6
6-phosphofructokinasepfkAXX999_03415EC:2.7.1.11
GluconokinasegntKXX999_03299EC:2.7.1.12
RibokinaserbsKXX999_01922EC:2.7.1.15
XylulokinasexylBXX999_01285EC:2.7.1.17
1-phosphofructokinasefruKXX999_00576EC:2.7.1.56
Glycerate 2-kinaseglxKXX999_02236EC:2.7.1.165
Phosphoglycerate kinasepgkXX999_03490EC:2.7.2.3
Ribose-phosphate diphosphokinaseprsAXX999_03492EC:2.7.6.1
Glucose-1-phosphate adenylyltransferaseglgCXX999_02075EC:2.7.7.27
XX999_03125
XX999_03346
XX999_00881
XX999_00563
XX999_02133
XX999_00115
XX999_00116
Glycosylases (glycosyl hydrolases)Oligo-1,6-glucosidasemalLXX999_00306EC:3.2.1.10GH13, GH31
Alpha-glucosidase∗∗malZXX999_00309EC:3.2.1.20GH4, GH13, GH31, GH63, GH97, GH122
Alpha-galactosidase∗∗galAXX999_03453EC:3.2.1.22GH4, GH27, GH31, GH36, GH57, GH97, GH110
Beta-galactosidase∗∗lacZXX999_03369EC:3.2.1.23
Alpha-mannosidaseE3.2.1.24XX999_03302EC:3.2.1.24GH1, GH2, GH3, GH35, GH39, GH42, GH50, GH59, NC
Beta-fructofuranosidase∗∗sacAXX999_03300EC:3.2.1.26
Xylan 1,4-beta-xylosidase∗∗xynBXX999_03301EC:3.2.1.37GH31, GH38, GH92
Alpha-L-rhamnosidaseramAXX999_03309EC:3.2.1.40GH32, GH68, GH100
Beta-N-acetylhexosaminidase∗∗nagZXX999_03287EC:3.2.1.52GH1, GH3, GH5, GH30, GH39, GH43, GH51, GH52, GH54, GH116, GH120
Cyclomaltodextrinase∗∗maXX999_03438EC:3.2.1.54
Non-reducing end alpha-L-arabinofuranosidase∗∗abfAXX999_03461EC:3.2.1.55GH78, GH106, CE15
6-phospho-beta-glucosidasebglAXX999_00304EC:3.2.1.86GH3, GH5, GH18, GH20, GH84, GH116, NC
Alpha, alpha-phosphotrehalasetreCXX999_03314EC:3.2.1.93GH13, GH57
Mannosylglycerate hydrolase
Alpha-D-xyloside xylohydrolasemngBXX999_02624EC:3.2.1.170
xylSXX999_03313EC:3.2.1.177GH2, GH3, GH10, GH43, GH51, GH54, GH62
XX999_03312GH1, GH4
XX999_02682GH13
XX999_03314GH38, GH63
XX999_00538
XX999_02708
XX999_02709
XX999_02906
XX999_03006
XX999_03053
XX999_03350
XX999_03357
XX999_03358
XX999_03459
XX999_00377
XX999_03347
XX999_03495
GH31
IsomerasesRibulose-phosphate 3-epimeraserpeXX999_01689EC:5.1.3.1
UDP-glucose 4-epimerasegaleXX999_00804EC:5.1.3.2GT1
Aldose 1-epimerasegalMXX999_01230EC:5.1.3.3
L-ribulose-5-phosphate 4-epimerasearaDXX999_02084EC:5.1.3.4
N-acylglucosamine-6-phosphate 2-epimerasenanEXX999_03032EC:5.1.3.9
UDP-N-acetylglucosamine 2-epimerase (non-hydrolyzing)wecBXX999_03298EC:5.1.3.14GT4
L-rhamnose mutarotaserhaMXX999_00914EC:5.1.3.32
2-epi-5-epi-valiolone epimerasecetBXX999_01783EC:5.1.3.33
D-allulose-6-phosphate 3-epimerasealsEXX999_03304EC:5.1.3.-
Triose-phosphate isomerasetpiAXX999_03394EC:5.3.1.1
L-arabinose isomerasearaAXX999_03407EC:5.3.1.4
Xylose isomerasexylAXX999_01209EC:5.3.1.5
Ribose-5-phosphate isomeraserpiAXX999_03414EC:5.3.1.6
Mannose-6-phosphate isomerasemanAXX999_00348EC:5.3.1.8
Glucose-6-phosphate isomerasepgiXX999_03373EC:5.3.1.9
L-rhamnose isomeraserhaAXX999_00882EC:5.3.1.14
1-(5-phosphoribosyl)-5-[(5-phosphoribosylamino)methylideneamino]imidazole-4-carboxamide isomerasehisAXX999_03393EC:5.3.1.16
trpFXX999_03493EC:5.3.1.24
hxlBXX999_00477EC:5.3.1.27
Phosphoribosylanthranilate isomerasepgmXX999_00762EC:5.4.2.2
6-phospho-3-hexuloisomerasepgmBXX999_02356EC:5.4.2.6
Phosphotransferases (phosphomutases)glmMXX999_02452EC:5.4.2.10
Beta-phosphoglucomutasegpmAXX999_03413EC:5.4.2.11
Phosphoglucosamine mutasegpmBXX999_02509EC:5.4.2.12
Phosphoglycerate mutase (2,3-diphosphoglycerate-dependent)XX999_01716
Phosphoglycerate mutase (2,3-diphosphoglycerate-independent)XX999_03454
XX999_00856
XX999_00121
XX999_00179
XX999_00910
XX999_00758
XX999_03037
XX999_00318
XX999_00974
XX999_00975
XX999_01026
XX999_01833
XX999_02136
XX999_02714
XX999_02790
Table 2

Genes necessary for the glycogen metabolism in Lactobacillus pentosus MP-10 isolated from naturally fermented Aloreña table olives.

Gene IDGeneGene length (bp)Protein (Uniref_protein)GO terms
XX999_00114glgB16231,4-alpha-glucan branching enzyme GlgB (UniRef100:P30538)1,4-alpha-glucan branching enzyme activity (MF); hydrolase activity, hydrolyzing O-glycosyl compounds (MF); glycogen biosynthetic process (BP); cation binding (MF)
XX999_00115glgC1140Glucose-1-phosphate adenylyltransferase (UniRef100:P39122)ATP binding (MF); glycogen biosynthetic process (BP); glucose-1-phosphate adenylyltransferase activity (MF)
XX999_00116glgD1173Glycogen biosynthesis protein GlgD (UniRef100:P39124)Glycogen biosynthetic process (BP); nucleotidyltransferase activity (MF)
XX999_00117glgA1440Glycogen synthase (UniRef100:P39125)Glycogen biosynthetic process (BP); starch synthase activity XX999_00297
XX999_00118glgP2403Glycogen phosphorylase (UniRef100:P39123)Glycogen metabolic process (BP); glycogen phosphorylase activity (MF); pyridoxal phosphate binding (MF)
XX999_00119apu1818Amylopullulanase precursor (UniRef100:P16950)Starch binding (MF); alpha-amylase activity (MF); carbohydrate metabolic process (BP); metal ion binding (MF); pullulanase activity (MF)
XX999_00297amyB1323Alpha-amylase 2 (UniRef100:P14898)Alpha-amylase activity (MF); cytoplasm (CC); carbohydrate metabolic process (BP); metal ion binding (MF)
XX999_00856pgcA1728Phosphoglucomutase (UniRef100:P18159)Magnesium ion binding (MF); phosphoglucomutase activity (MF); cytosol (CC); glycogen biosynthetic process (BP); glucose metabolic process (BP); enterobacterial common antigen biosynthetic process (BP); galactose catabolic process (BP)
XX999_01233XX999_012331032Glycogen synthase (UniRef100:P9WMY8)Glycogen (starch) synthase activity (MF); glycogen biosynthetic process (BP)
XX999_02081XX999_020811041Glycogen synthase (UniRef100:P9WMY8)Glycogen (starch) synthase activity (MF); glycogen biosynthetic process (BP)
Table 3

Genes necessary for complex carbohydrate metabolism in Lactobacillus pentosus MP-10 isolated from naturally fermented Aloreña table olives.

CarbohydrateGene IDGeneGene length (bp)Protein (Uniref_protein)Identity (%)E-valueGO terms
LevanXX999_02538levS_12448Levansucrase (UniRef100:Q70XJ9)44.072e-07Extracellular region (CC); cell wall (CC); carbohydrate metabolic process (BP); carbohydrate utilization (BP); metal ion binding (MF); levansucrase activity (MF)
XX999_02724levS_23078Levansucrase (RefSeq:Q70XJ9)46.673e-24
XX999_02966levS_32688Levansucrase (UniRef100:Q70XJ9)50.42e-06Extracellular region (CC); cell wall (CC); membrane (CC)
XX999_02983levS_46552Levansucrase (UniRef100:Q70XJ9)62.41e-09Extracellular region (CC); cell wall (CC); carbohydrate metabolic process (BP); carbohydrate utilization (BP); metal ion binding (MF); levansucrase activity (MF)
ChitinXX999_00964XX999_00964759Hypotheticalprotein26.878e-23Polysaccharide catabolic process (BP); cytoplasm (CC); chitin catabolic process (BP); chitin disaccharide deacetylase activity (MF); metal ion binding (MF); diacetylchitobiose catabolic process (BP)
XX999_03477exo I1851Beta-hexosaminidase (UniRef100:P96155)25.738e-12Polysaccharide catabolic process (BP); beta-N-acetylhexosaminidase activity (MF); chitin catabolic process (BP); periplasmic space (CC)
RaffinoseXX999_03302rafA2217Alpha-galactosidase (UniRef100:P16551)33.164e-96Carbohydrate metabolic process (BP); raffinose alpha-galactosidase activity (MF)
CelluloseXX999_00850XX999_008501446Cellulose synthase regulator protein (CLUSTERS:PRK11114)
XX999_00851XX999_00851702Cellulose synthase regulator protein (CLUSTERS:PRK11114)
XX999_01507bcsA1986Cellulose synthase catalytic subunit [UDP-forming] (UniRef100:P37653)27.893e-65Plasma membrane (CC); UDP-glucose metabolic process (BP); integral component of membrane (CC); cellulose synthase (UDP-forming) activity (MF); cyclic-di-GMP binding (MF); bacterial cellulose biosynthetic process (BP)
XX999_02472yedQ1194Putative diguanylate cyclase YedQ (UniRef100:P76330)28.917e-20Negative regulation of bacterial-type flagellum-dependent cell motility (BP); GTP
XX999_03259XX999_03259984Hypothetical protein (UniRef100:P10477)24.643e-06lipid metabolic process (BP); cellulase activity (MF); hydrolase activity, acting on ester bonds (MF); cellulose catabolic process (BP)
XylanXX999_00089XX999_00089588Polysaccharide deacetylase (UniRef100:P54865)30.777e-05Hydrolaseactivity, actingoncarbon-nitrogen (butnotpeptide) bonds (MF); polysaccharidebinding (MF); endo-1,4-beta-xylanase activity (MF); xylancatabolicprocess (BP)
XX999_01054axeA1_1798Acetylxylan esterase precursor (UniRef100:D5EV35)26.822e-11Xylancatabolicprocess (BP); acetylxylan esterase activity (MF)
XX999_02525xynY918Endo-1,4-beta-xylanase Y precursor (UniRef100:P51584)29.513e-29Endo-1,4-beta-xylanase activity (MF); cellulosome (CC); xylancatabolicprocess (BP)
XX999_03401axeA1_2837Acetylxylan esterase precursor (UniRef100:D5EV35)27.634e-12Xylancatabolicprocess (BP); acetylxylan esterase activity (MF)
XX999_03577axeA1_3714Acetylxylan esterase precursor (UniRef100:D5EV35)27.593e-12Xylancatabolicprocess (BP); acetylxylan esterase activity (MF)
Table 4

Genes coding for extracellular proteins with roles in adhesion or interaction with the host as predicted from genome annotation of Lactobacillus pentosus MP-10 isolated from naturally fermented Aloreña table olives.

Gene IDGeneGene length (bp)Protein (Uniref_protein/Pfam)Identity (%)E-valueOrganismGO terms
XX999_01369XX999_0136911817MucBP domain protein (Pfam:PF06458.6)Mucin-Binding Protein
XX999_01708XX999_017086885
XX999_00892glnH_11437Glutamine-binding periplasmic protein40.985e-43Escherichia coli O157:H7Transporter activity (MF); amino acid transport (BP); periplasmic space (CC)
XX999_02287glnH_3840precursor (UniRef100:P0AEQ5)311e-29
XX999_01827lspA450Lipoprotein signal peptidase (UniRef100:C4ZPV3)55.51e-10Escherichia coli K12Aspartic-type endopeptidase activity (MF); plasma membrane (CC); integral component of membrane (CC)
XX999_02097tuf1188Elongation factor Tu (UniRef100:P0DA82)77.080.0Streptococcus pyogenes ATCC BAA-595Translation elongation factor activity (MF); GTPase activity (MF); GTP binding (MF); cytoplasm (CC)
XX999_01594pgaC_11314Poly-beta-1,6-N-acetyl-D-glucosamine33.893e-66Escherichia coli K12Plasma membrane (CC); metabolic process (BP); acetylglucosaminyltransferase activity (MF); integral component of membrane (CC); cell adhesion involved in biofilm formation (BP)
XX999_02115pgaC_21356synthase (UniRef100:P75905)25.971e-19
X999_01138psaA_1942Manganese ABC transporter substrate-binding51.966e-113Streptococcus pneumoniae ATCC BAA-334Plasma membrane (CC); cell adhesion (BP); metal ion transport (BP); metal ion binding (MF)
XX999_02913psaA_2894binding lipoprotein precursor27.217e-23
XX999_03164psaA_3909(UniRef100:P0A4G2)25.094e-13
XX999_00883eno21329Enolase 2 (UniRef100:Q042F4)78.650.0Lactobacillus gasseri ATCC 33323Phosphopyruvate hydratase complex (CC); magnesium ion binding (MF); phosphopyruvate hydratase activity (MF); extracellular region (CC); glycolytic process (BP); cell surface (CC)
XX999_00880gap1023Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (UniRef100:Q59309)57.862e-137Clostridium pasteurianumGlyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (NAD++) (phosphorylating) activity (MF); cytoplasm (CC); glucose metabolic process (BP); glycolytic process (BP); NADP binding (MF); NAD binding (MF)
XX999_02862XX999_028621884Collagen binding domain protein
XX999_00818groS28510 kDa chaperonin (UniRef100:Q07200)61.966e-37Geobacillus stearothermophilusATP binding (MF); cytoplasm (CC); protein folding (BP)
XX999_00819groL162660 kDa chaperonin (UniRef100:Q04IQ3)75.790.0Staphylococcus aureus Mu50ATP binding (MF); cytoplasm (CC); protein refolding (BP)
XX999_01649pgiglnA1347Glutamine synthetase (UniRef100:P60890)67.860.0Streptococcus pneumoniae D39Glutamate-ammonia ligase activity (MF); ATP binding (MF); cytoplasm (CC); glutamine biosynthetic process (BP); nitrogen fixation (BP)
XX999_02452pgi1353Glucose-6-phosphate isomerase (UniRef100:P81181)64.960.0Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis IL1403Glucose-6-phosphate isomerase activity (MF); cytoplasm (CC); gluconeogenesis (BP); glycolytic process (BP)
  53 in total

Review 1.  Probiotic bacteria in fermented foods: product characteristics and starter organisms.

Authors:  K J Heller
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 2.  Appropriate starter culture technologies for small-scale fermentation in developing countries.

Authors:  W H Holzapfel
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2002-05-25       Impact factor: 5.277

Review 3.  Environmental stress responses in Lactobacillus: a review.

Authors:  Maria De Angelis; Marco Gobbetti
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.984

4.  ARAGORN, a program to detect tRNA genes and tmRNA genes in nucleotide sequences.

Authors:  Dean Laslett; Bjorn Canback
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-01-02       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 5.  Commercial bacterial starter cultures for fermented foods of the future.

Authors:  Egon Bech Hansen
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2002-09-15       Impact factor: 5.277

6.  Purification and characterization of a surface-binding protein from Lactobacillus fermentum RC-14 that inhibits adhesion of Enterococcus faecalis 1131.

Authors:  C Heinemann; J E van Hylckama Vlieg; D B Janssen; H J Busscher; H C van der Mei; G Reid
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2000-09-01       Impact factor: 2.742

7.  Temperature and pH conditions that prevail during fermentation of sausages are optimal for production of the antilisterial bacteriocin sakacin K.

Authors:  F Leroy; L de Vuyst
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Metabolism by bifidobacteria and lactic acid bacteria of polysaccharides from wheat and rye, and exopolysaccharides produced by Lactobacillus sanfranciscensis.

Authors:  M Korakli; M G Gänzle; R F Vogel
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.772

9.  Extracellular MUC3 mucin secretion follows adherence of Lactobacillus strains to intestinal epithelial cells in vitro.

Authors:  D R Mack; S Ahrne; L Hyde; S Wei; M A Hollingsworth
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Cell surface-associated elongation factor Tu mediates the attachment of Lactobacillus johnsonii NCC533 (La1) to human intestinal cells and mucins.

Authors:  Dominique Granato; Gabriela E Bergonzelli; Raymond David Pridmore; Laure Marvin; Martine Rouvet; Irène E Corthésy-Theulaz
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.441

View more
  11 in total

1.  In vitro and genetic screening of probiotic properties of lactic acid bacteria isolated from naturally fermented cow-milk and yak-milk products of Sikkim, India.

Authors:  Ranjita Rai; Jyoti Prakash Tamang
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Understanding the Xylooligosaccharides Utilization Mechanism of Lactobacillus brevis and Bifidobacterium adolescentis: Proteins Involved and Their Conformational Stabilities for Effectual Binding.

Authors:  Ishu Khangwal; Sinosh Skariyachan; Akshay Uttarkar; Aditi G Muddebihalkar; Vidya Niranjan; Pratyoosh Shukla
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 2.695

3.  Probiogenomic Analysis of Lactiplantibacillus sp. LM14-2 from Fermented Mussel (Hoi-dong), and Evaluation of its Cholesterol-lowering and Immunomodulation Effects.

Authors:  Engkarat Kingkaew; Hiroshi Konno; Yoshihito Hosaka; Somboon Tanasupawat
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2022-08-20       Impact factor: 5.265

4.  Characterization of two new strains of Lactococcus lactis for their probiotic efficacy over commercial synbiotics consortia.

Authors:  Biplab Bandyopadhyay; Satinath Das; Prashanta Kumar Mitra; Ashutosh Kundu; Vivekananda Mandal; Rajsekhar Adhikary; Vivekananda Mandal; Narayan Chandra Mandal
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 2.214

5.  Nutritional Composition and Microbial Communities of Two Non-alcoholic Traditional Fermented Beverages from Zambia: A Study of Mabisi and Munkoyo.

Authors:  Justin Chileshe; Joost van den Heuvel; Ray Handema; Bas J Zwaan; Elise F Talsma; Sijmen Schoustra
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 5.717

6.  Probiogenomics of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. lactis CIDCA 133: In Silico, In Vitro, and In Vivo Approaches.

Authors:  Luís Cláudio Lima de Jesus; Mariana Martins Drumond; Flávia Figueira Aburjaile; Thiago de Jesus Sousa; Nina Dias Coelho-Rocha; Rodrigo Profeta; Bertram Brenig; Pamela Mancha-Agresti; Vasco Azevedo
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2021-04-14

7.  High-quality whole-genome sequence analysis of Lactobacillus paragasseri UBLG-36 reveals oxalate-degrading potential of the strain.

Authors:  Yogita Mehra; Pragasam Viswanathan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Probing Genome-Scale Model Reveals Metabolic Capability and Essential Nutrients for Growth of Probiotic Limosilactobacillus reuteri KUB-AC5.

Authors:  Thanawat Namrak; Nachon Raethong; Theeraphol Jatuponwiphat; Sunee Nitisinprasert; Wanwipa Vongsangnak; Massalin Nakphaichit
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-11

9.  In Vitro and in Vivo Selection of Potentially Probiotic Lactobacilli From Nocellara del Belice Table Olives.

Authors:  Barbara Guantario; Paola Zinno; Emily Schifano; Marianna Roselli; Giuditta Perozzi; Claudio Palleschi; Daniela Uccelletti; Chiara Devirgiliis
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Fermented-Food Metagenomics Reveals Substrate-Associated Differences in Taxonomy and Health-Associated and Antibiotic Resistance Determinants.

Authors:  John Leech; Raul Cabrera-Rubio; Aaron M Walsh; Guerrino Macori; Calum J Walsh; Wiley Barton; Laura Finnegan; Fiona Crispie; Orla O'Sullivan; Marcus J Claesson; Paul D Cotter
Journal:  mSystems       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 6.496

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.