Literature DB >> 28583341

Exploring the Optimal Erectile Function Domain Score Cutoff That Defines Sexual Satisfaction After Radical Prostatectomy.

Jean E Terrier1, John P Mulhall1, Christian J Nelson2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) is the gold standard validated instrument for defining erectile function (EF) and its response to treatment. The EF domain (EFD) contains six questions and is a sensitive and specific measurement of treatment-related changes in EF. The EFD score has been widely used as a primary assessment end point for clinical trials of EF recovery after radical prostatectomy (RP). Various EFD scores have been used to define functional erections. Recently, an EFD score of at least 22 has been used as a threshold in major post-RP penile rehabilitation studies. AIM: To define the EFD score that optimally defines "functional" erections after RP.
METHODS: We assessed men 24 months after RP using the IIEF and specifically analyzed the scores of the EFD and intercourse satisfaction domain (ISD). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We used two questions on satisfaction (score = 0-5) and enjoyment (score = 0-5) from the ISD to classify IS (score = 0-10). We tested the following intercourse satisfaction classifications: ISD score equal to 10, ISD score of at least 8, and a score of at least 4 for the ISD questions on satisfaction and enjoyment. We used the classification that produced the largest area under the curve (AUC) using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Then, we used a three-step process to determine the optimal EFD score cutoff using sensitivity and specificity analysis.
RESULTS: One hundred seventy-eight men had an average age at RP of 58 ± 7 years and a 24-month EFD score of 20 ± 9. Sixty-four percent had complete nerve-sparing surgery, 35% had partial nerve-sparing surgery, and 1% had the nerves fully resected. Thirty-three percent had laparoscopic RP and 67% had open RP. The ROC curves produced AUCs of 0.80 (ISD score = 10), 0.85 (ISD score ≥ 8), and 0.86 (ISD scores for satisfaction and enjoyment ≥ 4; P < .001 for all comparisons). Using the IS criterion of ISD scores for satisfaction and enjoyment of at least 4 (largest AUC), the sensitivity and specificity values were 0.89 and 0.66 for an ESD score equal to 22, 0.78 and 0.71 for a score equal to 23, 0.78 and 0.80 for a score equal to 24, 0.77 and 0.82 for a score equal to 25, and 0.73 and 0.85 for a score equal to 26. The scores of 24 and 25 met the criteria outlined in the first two steps of analysis. The score of 24 was selected as the cutoff using face valid judgment and the previous literature.
CONCLUSION: These data support an EFD score of 24 as a valid cutoff defining "functional" erection in men with erectile dysfunction after RP. These data are important for clinicians in counseling patients and to researchers to define inclusion criteria and treatment end points for trials of erectile dysfunction after RP. Terrier JE, Muhall JP, Nelson CJ. Exploring the Optimal Erectile Function Domain Score Cutoff That Defines Sexual Satisfaction After Radical Prostatectomy. J Sex Med 2017;14:804-809.
Copyright © 2017 International Society for Sexual Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Erectile Dysfunction; Erectile Function; International Index of Erectile Function; Prostate Cancer; Prostatectomy; Score Interpretation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28583341      PMCID: PMC6948920          DOI: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2017.04.672

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sex Med        ISSN: 1743-6095            Impact factor:   3.802


  22 in total

Review 1.  The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF): a state-of-the-science review.

Authors:  R C Rosen; J C Cappelleri; N Gendrano
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.896

2.  Estimation of the Youden Index and its associated cutoff point.

Authors:  Ronen Fluss; David Faraggi; Benjamin Reiser
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.207

3.  Index for rating diagnostic tests.

Authors:  W J YOUDEN
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1950-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Sexual bother following radical prostatectomyjsm.

Authors:  Christian J Nelson; Serkan Deveci; Jason Stasi; Peter T Scardino; John P Mulhall
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.802

5.  Guidelines for reporting of statistics in European Urology.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Daniel D Sjoberg
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Choosing the best candidates for penile rehabilitation after bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Alberto Briganti; Ettore Di Trapani; Firas Abdollah; Andrea Gallina; Nazareno Suardi; Umberto Capitanio; Manuela Tutolo; Niccolò Passoni; Andrea Salonia; Valerio DiGirolamo; Renzo Colombo; Giorgio Guazzoni; Patrizio Rigatti; Francesco Montorsi
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 3.802

Review 7.  NIH Consensus Conference. Impotence. NIH Consensus Development Panel on Impotence.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-07-07       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Men's experience with penile rehabilitation following radical prostatectomy: a qualitative study with the goal of informing a therapeutic intervention.

Authors:  Christian J Nelson; Stephanie Lacey; Joslyn Kenowitz; Hayley Pessin; Elyse Shuk; Andrew J Roth; John P Mulhall
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 3.894

9.  Annual Report to the Nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2010, featuring prevalence of comorbidity and impact on survival among persons with lung, colorectal, breast, or prostate cancer.

Authors:  Brenda K Edwards; Anne-Michelle Noone; Angela B Mariotto; Edgar P Simard; Francis P Boscoe; S Jane Henley; Ahmedin Jemal; Hyunsoon Cho; Robert N Anderson; Betsy A Kohler; Christie R Eheman; Elizabeth M Ward
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Defining sexual outcomes after treatment for localized prostate carcinoma.

Authors:  Leslie R Schover; Rachel T Fouladi; Carla L Warneke; Leah Neese; Eric A Klein; Craig Zippe; Patrick A Kupelian
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  7 in total

1.  Development and Validation of Crosswalks for Patient-reported Sexual and Urinary Outcomes Between Commonly Used Instruments.

Authors:  Karandeep Singh; Amy L Tin; Rodney L Dunn; Tae Kim; Andrew J Vickers
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Are We Improving Erectile Function Recovery After Radical Prostatectomy? Analysis of Patients Treated over the Last Decade.

Authors:  Paolo Capogrosso; Emily A Vertosick; Nicole E Benfante; James A Eastham; Peter J Scardino; Andrew J Vickers; John P Mulhall
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Updating the International Index of Erectile Function: Evaluation of a Large Clinical Data Set.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Amy L Tin; Karandeep Singh; Rodney L Dunn; John Mulhall
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 3.802

4.  MRI-guided focused ultrasound focal therapy for patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer: a phase 2b, multicentre study.

Authors:  Behfar Ehdaie; Clare M Tempany; Ford Holland; Daniel D Sjoberg; Adam S Kibel; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Jeremy C Durack; Oguz Akin; Andrew J Vickers; Peter T Scardino; Dan Sperling; Jeffrey Y C Wong; Bertram Yuh; David A Woodrum; Lance A Mynderse; Steven S Raman; Allan J Pantuck; Marc H Schiffman; Timothy D McClure; Geoffrey A Sonn; Pejman Ghanouni
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 54.433

5.  Development and Validation of Dynamic Multivariate Prediction Models of Sexual Function Recovery in Patients with Prostate Cancer Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy: Results from the MUSIC Statewide Collaborative.

Authors:  Nnenaya Agochukwu-Mmonu; Adharsh Murali; Daniela Wittmann; Brian Denton; Rodney L Dunn; James Montie; James Peabody; David Miller; Karandeep Singh
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2022-04-18

6.  Comparison of Two Methods for Assessing Erectile Function Before Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Carlo Andrea Bravi; Amy Tin; Nicole Benfante; Andrea Salonia; Alberto Briganti; Francesco Montorsi; John P Mulhall; James A Eastham; Andrew J Vickers
Journal:  Eur Urol Oncol       Date:  2019-03-09

7.  Functional outcomes rather than complications predict poor health-related quality of life at 6 months after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Marinus J Hagens; H Veerman; K M de Ligt; C N Tillier; P J van Leeuwen; R J A van Moorselaar; H G van der Poel
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2021-06-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.