Literature DB >> 12365027

Defining sexual outcomes after treatment for localized prostate carcinoma.

Leslie R Schover1, Rachel T Fouladi, Carla L Warneke, Leah Neese, Eric A Klein, Craig Zippe, Patrick A Kupelian.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective of this survey was to identify factors associated with good sexual outcomes in a large group of survivors of localized prostate carcinoma.
METHODS: A postal survey was sent to 2636 men in the Cleveland Clinic Foundation's Prostate Cancer Registry who either were treated with definitive radiotherapy or underwent prostatectomy for localized prostate carcinoma. The survey asked about demographic items, past and current sexual functioning, partner's sexual function and health, and a number of factors hypothesized to affect sexual satisfaction. Standardized questionnaires included the Sexual Self-Schema Scale-Male Version, the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), urinary and bowel symptom scales from the Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index, and the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36).
RESULTS: The return rate was 49%, yielding a sample of 1236 men at an average of 4.3 years post-treatment. Comparing responders with nonresponders suggested that the sample may have been somewhat biased toward men who were more interested in maintaining sexual function. At the time they were diagnosed with prostate carcinoma, 36% of men had erectile dysfunction (ED). Within the past 6 months, however, 85% of men reported having ED. Only 13% of men were having reliable, firm erections spontaneously, and another 8% of men were having erections with the aid of a medical treatment. Men were as distressed about loss of desire and trouble having satisfying orgasms as they were about ED. Of the 84% of men who reported having a current sexual partner, 66% indicated that she had a sexual problem. Younger age was associated strongly with better sexual outcome (global IIEF score). With demographic factors taken into account, better sexual outcome was related significantly to medical factors, including not having neoadjuvant or current antiandrogen therapy, undergoing bilateral nerve-sparing prostatectomy or brachytherapy, and having better mental and physical health composite scores on the SF-36. Sexual factors that were associated with a better outcome included having normal erections before treatment for prostate carcinoma, choosing a treatment based on the hope that it would preserve sexual function, having more sexual partners in the past year, and having a sexually functional partner.
CONCLUSIONS: The great majority of men who survive prostate carcinoma do not achieve a return to functional sexual activity in the years after treatment. The priorities a man places on sexuality and on having a sexually functional partner are important factors in sexual satisfaction at follow-up, over and above the influence of age and medical factors. Copyright 2002 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12365027     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.10848

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  77 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic resonance spectroscopy: a promising tool for the diagnostics of human prostate cancer?

Authors:  Johannes Kurth; Elita Defeo; Leo L Cheng
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2011 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.498

Review 2.  Epidemiology of erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  Stanley G Korenman
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.633

3.  Association of stress management skills and perceived stress with physical and emotional well-being among advanced prostrate cancer survivors following androgen deprivation treatment.

Authors:  Frank J Penedo; Catherine Benedict; Eric S Zhou; Mikal Rasheed; Lara Traeger; Bruce R Kava; Mark Soloway; Sara Czaja; Michael H Antoni
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  2013-03

4.  A randomized trial of internet-based versus traditional sexual counseling for couples after localized prostate cancer treatment.

Authors:  Leslie R Schover; Andrea L Canada; Ying Yuan; Dawen Sui; Leah Neese; Rosell Jenkins; Michelle M Rhodes
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 5.  Telemedicine and prostate cancer survivorship: a narrative review.

Authors:  Nnenaya Q Agochukwu; Ted A Skolarus; Daniela Wittmann
Journal:  Mhealth       Date:  2018-10-08

6.  The Development of an eHealth tool suite for prostate cancer patients and their partners.

Authors:  Donna Van Bogaert; Robert Hawkins; Suzanne Pingree; David Jarrard
Journal:  J Support Oncol       Date:  2012-05-15

Review 7.  Communication and intimacy-enhancing interventions for men diagnosed with prostate cancer and their partners.

Authors:  Christian J Nelson; Joslyn Kenowitz
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.802

Review 8.  What happened? Sexual consequences of prostate cancer and its treatment.

Authors:  Anne Katz
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.275

9.  Outcome of preemptive penile rehabilitation before bilateral cavernosal nerve injury in rats.

Authors:  Hasan Hüseyin Tavukçu; Cem Akbal; Ilker Tinay; Ferruh Simşek; Levent Türkeri
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2009-12-12       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 10.  Prevalence of post-prostatectomy erectile dysfunction and a review of the recommended therapeutic modalities.

Authors:  Thiago Fernandes Negris Lima; Joshua Bitran; Fabio Stefano Frech; Ranjith Ramasamy
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 2.896

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.