Literature DB >> 28582632

Prostate Cancer: A Correlative Study of Multiparametric MR Imaging and Digital Histopathology.

Jin Tae Kwak1, Sandeep Sankineni1, Sheng Xu1, Baris Turkbey1, Peter L Choyke1, Peter A Pinto1, Vanessa Moreno1, Maria Merino1, Bradford J Wood1.   

Abstract

Purpose To correlate multiparametric magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and quantitative digital histopathologic analysis (DHA) of the prostate. Materials and Methods This retrospective study was approved by the local institutional review board and was HIPAA compliant. Forty patients (median age, 60 years; age range, 44-71 years) who underwent prostate MR imaging consisting of T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted (DW) MR imaging along with subsequent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy gave informed consent to be included. Whole-mount tissue specimens were obtained with a patient-specific mold, and DHA was performed to assess the lumen, epithelium, stroma, and epithelial nucleus. These DHA images were registered with MR images and were correlated on a per-voxel basis. The relationship between MR imaging and DHA was assessed by using a linear mixed-effects model and the Pearson correlation coefficient. Results T2-weighted MR imaging, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of DW imaging, and high-b-value DW imaging were significantly related to specific DHA parameters (P < .01). For instance, lumen density (ie, the percentage area of tissue components) was associated with T2-weighted MR imaging (slope = 0.36 ± 0.05 [standard error], γ = 0.35), ADC (slope = 0.47 ± 0.05, γ = 0.50), and high-b-value DW imaging (slope = -0.44 ± 0.05, γ = -0.44). Differences between regions harboring benign tissue and those harboring malignant tissue were observed at MR imaging and DHA (P < .01). Gleason score was significantly associated with MR imaging and DHA parameters (P < .05). For example, it was positively related to high-b-value DW imaging (slope = 0.21 ± 0.16, γ = 0.18) and negatively related to lumen density (slope = -0.19 ± 0.18, γ = -0.35). Conclusion Overall, significant associations were observed between MR imaging and DHA, regardless of prostate anatomy. © RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28582632      PMCID: PMC5621723          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2017160906

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  24 in total

Review 1.  Standardization of biological dyes and stains: pitfalls and possibilities.

Authors:  E K Schulte
Journal:  Histochemistry       Date:  1991

2.  Correlation of ADC and T2 measurements with cell density in prostate cancer at 3.0 Tesla.

Authors:  Peter Gibbs; Gary P Liney; Martin D Pickles; Bashar Zelhof; Greta Rodrigues; Lindsay W Turnbull
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 6.016

3.  A method for correlating in vivo prostate magnetic resonance imaging and histopathology using individualized magnetic resonance-based molds.

Authors:  Vijay Shah; Thomas Pohida; Baris Turkbey; Haresh Mani; Maria Merino; Peter A Pinto; Peter Choyke; Marcelino Bernardo
Journal:  Rev Sci Instrum       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.523

4.  Prostate cancer: value of multiparametric MR imaging at 3 T for detection--histopathologic correlation.

Authors:  Baris Turkbey; Peter A Pinto; Haresh Mani; Marcelino Bernardo; Yuxi Pang; Yolanda L McKinney; Kiranpreet Khurana; Gregory C Ravizzini; Paul S Albert; Maria J Merino; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Prostate cancer: correlation of MR images with tissue optical density at pathologic examination.

Authors:  L E Quint; J S Van Erp; P H Bland; E A Del Buono; S H Mandell; H B Grossman; P W Gikas
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Prostate tissue composition and MR measurements: investigating the relationships between ADC, T2, K(trans), v(e), and corresponding histologic features.

Authors:  Deanna L Langer; Theodorus H van der Kwast; Andrew J Evans; Anna Plotkin; John Trachtenberg; Brian C Wilson; Masoom A Haider
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Prostate cancer: body-array versus endorectal coil MR imaging at 3 T--comparison of image quality, localization, and staging performance.

Authors:  Stijn W T P J Heijmink; Jurgen J Fütterer; Thomas Hambrock; Satoru Takahashi; Tom W J Scheenen; Henkjan J Huisman; Christina A Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa; Ben C Knipscheer; Lambertus A L M Kiemeney; J Alfred Witjes; Jelle O Barentsz
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of prostate cancer: correlation between apparent diffusion coefficient values and tumor proliferation.

Authors:  Xi Zhen Wang; Bin Wang; Zhi Qin Gao; Jin Gang Liu; Zuo Qin Liu; Qing Liang Niu; Zhen Kui Sun; Yu Xiao Yuan
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Update on the Gleason grading system for prostate cancer: results of an international consensus conference of urologic pathologists.

Authors:  Jonathan I Epstein; William C Allsbrook; Mahul B Amin; Lars L Egevad
Journal:  Adv Anat Pathol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.875

10.  Correlation of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance data with cellularity in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Bashar Zelhof; Martin Pickles; Gary Liney; Peter Gibbs; Greta Rodrigues; Sigurd Kraus; Lindsay Turnbull
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 5.588

View more
  10 in total

1.  A Multireader Exploratory Evaluation of Individual Pulse Sequence Cancer Detection on Prostate Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI).

Authors:  Sonia Gaur; Stephanie Harmon; Rajan T Gupta; Daniel J Margolis; Nathan Lay; Sherif Mehralivand; Maria J Merino; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto; Joanna H Shih; Peter L Choyke; Baris Turkbey
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Value of MRI texture analysis for predicting new Gleason grade group.

Authors:  Xiaojing He; Hui Xiong; Haiping Zhang; Xinjie Liu; Jun Zhou; Dajing Guo
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Non-Invasive Prostate Cancer Characterization with Diffusion-Weighted MRI: Insight from In silico Studies of a Transgenic Mouse Model.

Authors:  Deborah K Hill; Andreas Heindl; Konstantinos Zormpas-Petridis; David J Collins; Leslie R Euceda; Daniel N Rodrigues; Siver A Moestue; Yann Jamin; Dow-Mu Koh; Yinyin Yuan; Tone F Bathen; Martin O Leach; Matthew D Blackledge
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 6.244

4.  Repeatability of Quantitative Imaging Features in Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Hong Lu; Nestor A Parra; Jin Qi; Kenneth Gage; Qian Li; Shuxuan Fan; Sebastian Feuerlein; Julio Pow-Sang; Robert Gillies; Jung W Choi; Yoganand Balagurunathan
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging Parameters at 1 Year Correlate With Clinical Outcomes Up to 17 Years After Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation.

Authors:  Helen S McCarthy; Iain W McCall; John M Williams; Claire Mennan; Marit N Dugard; James B Richardson; Sally Roberts
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2018-08-07

Review 6.  MR Imaging-Histology Correlation by Tailored 3D-Printed Slicer in Oncological Assessment.

Authors:  D Baldi; M Aiello; A Duggento; M Salvatore; C Cavaliere
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 3.161

7.  DWI-related texture analysis for prostate cancer: differences in correlation with histological aggressiveness and data repeatability between peripheral and transition zones.

Authors:  Chie Tsuruta; Kenji Hirata; Kohsuke Kudo; Naoya Masumori; Masamitsu Hatakenaka
Journal:  Eur Radiol Exp       Date:  2022-01-12

8.  Spatial density and diversity of architectural histology in prostate cancer: influence on diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Stephanie A Harmon; G Thomas Brown; Thomas Sanford; Sherif Mehralivand; Joanna H Shih; Sheng Xu; Maria J Merino; Peter L Choyke; Peter A Pinto; Bradford J Wood; Jesse K McKenney; Baris Turkbey
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2020-02

9.  T1 and T2 MR fingerprinting measurements of prostate cancer and prostatitis correlate with deep learning-derived estimates of epithelium, lumen, and stromal composition on corresponding whole mount histopathology.

Authors:  Rakesh Shiradkar; Ananya Panda; Patrick Leo; Andrew Janowczyk; Xavier Farre; Nafiseh Janaki; Lin Li; Shivani Pahwa; Amr Mahran; Christina Buzzy; Pingfu Fu; Robin Elliott; Gregory MacLennan; Lee Ponsky; Vikas Gulani; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Registration of histopathology to magnetic resonance imaging of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Kristina Sandgren; Erik Nilsson; Angsana Keeratijarut Lindberg; Sara Strandberg; Lennart Blomqvist; Anders Bergh; Bengt Friedrich; Jan Axelsson; Margareta Ögren; Mattias Ögren; Anders Widmark; Camilla Thellenberg Karlsson; Karin Söderkvist; Katrine Riklund; Joakim Jonsson; Tufve Nyholm
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-04-12
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.