PURPOSE: To investigate whether the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of prostate cancer (PCa) are able to reflect tumor proliferation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The clinical and pathological information for 38 patients with PCa and 33 patients with benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) were studied. Examination of the patients was performed using a 1.5 T superconducting magnetic scanner equipped with a pelvic phased-array multicoil. Diffusion-weighted images (DWIs) were acquired using an echo-planar imaging sequence. The ADC values of PCa, BPH, and peripheral zone (PZ) were calculated. The cellularity of PCa was recorded based on hematoxylin and eosin staining. The proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) was detected using an immunohistochemical technique. RESULTS: The ADC values of PCa, BPH, and PZ were 49.32 +/- 12.68 x 10(-5) mm(2)/s, 86.73 +/- 26.75 x 10(-5) mm(2)/s, and 126.25 +/- 27.21 x 10(-5) mm(2)/s, respectively. The ADC values of PCa were lower than those of BPH and PZ (P < 0.05). The cellularity and PCNA labeling index (LI) of PCa were higher than those of BPH (P < 0.05). The ADC values of PCa were negatively correlated with those of cellularity and PCNA LI (r = -0.646 and -0.446, respectively; P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The ADC values of PCa can reveal the differences in proliferative activity between PCa and BPH. These values are therefore able to predict the proliferative rate of variously differentiated prostate cancers.
PURPOSE: To investigate whether the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of prostate cancer (PCa) are able to reflect tumor proliferation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The clinical and pathological information for 38 patients with PCa and 33 patients with benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) were studied. Examination of the patients was performed using a 1.5 T superconducting magnetic scanner equipped with a pelvic phased-array multicoil. Diffusion-weighted images (DWIs) were acquired using an echo-planar imaging sequence. The ADC values of PCa, BPH, and peripheral zone (PZ) were calculated. The cellularity of PCa was recorded based on hematoxylin and eosin staining. The proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) was detected using an immunohistochemical technique. RESULTS: The ADC values of PCa, BPH, and PZ were 49.32 +/- 12.68 x 10(-5) mm(2)/s, 86.73 +/- 26.75 x 10(-5) mm(2)/s, and 126.25 +/- 27.21 x 10(-5) mm(2)/s, respectively. The ADC values of PCa were lower than those of BPH and PZ (P < 0.05). The cellularity and PCNA labeling index (LI) of PCa were higher than those of BPH (P < 0.05). The ADC values of PCa were negatively correlated with those of cellularity and PCNA LI (r = -0.646 and -0.446, respectively; P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The ADC values of PCa can reveal the differences in proliferative activity between PCa and BPH. These values are therefore able to predict the proliferative rate of variously differentiated prostate cancers.
Authors: Sonia Gaur; Stephanie Harmon; Lauren Rosenblum; Matthew D Greer; Sherif Mehralivand; Mehmet Coskun; Maria J Merino; Bradford J Wood; Joanna H Shih; Peter A Pinto; Peter L Choyke; Baris Turkbey Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2018-05-07 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Sonia Gaur; Stephanie Harmon; Rajan T Gupta; Daniel J Margolis; Nathan Lay; Sherif Mehralivand; Maria J Merino; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto; Joanna H Shih; Peter L Choyke; Baris Turkbey Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2018-04-25 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Guang Jia; Ronney Abaza; JoAnna D Williams; Debra L Zynger; Jinyuan Zhou; Zarine K Shah; Mitva Patel; Steffen Sammet; Lai Wei; Robert R Bahnson; Michael V Knopp Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Barış Türkbey; Marcelino Bernardo; Maria J Merino; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto; Peter L Choyke Journal: Diagn Interv Radiol Date: 2011-09-16 Impact factor: 2.630
Authors: Renu M Stephen; Mark D Pagel; Kathy Brown; Amanda F Baker; Emmanuelle J Meuillet; Robert J Gillies Journal: Exp Biol Med (Maywood) Date: 2012-11
Authors: Baris Turkbey; Vijay P Shah; Yuxi Pang; Marcelino Bernardo; Sheng Xu; Jochen Kruecker; Julia Locklin; Angelo A Baccala; Ardeshir R Rastinehad; Maria J Merino; Joanna H Shih; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto; Peter L Choyke Journal: Radiology Date: 2010-12-21 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Jin Tae Kwak; Sandeep Sankineni; Sheng Xu; Baris Turkbey; Peter L Choyke; Peter A Pinto; Maria Merino; Bradford J Wood Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2015-09-04 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: John V Hegde; Robert V Mulkern; Lawrence P Panych; Fiona M Fennessy; Andriy Fedorov; Stephan E Maier; Clare M C Tempany Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2013-05 Impact factor: 4.813