Rakesh Shiradkar1, Ananya Panda2,3, Patrick Leo4, Andrew Janowczyk4, Xavier Farre5, Nafiseh Janaki6,7, Lin Li4, Shivani Pahwa3, Amr Mahran8, Christina Buzzy8, Pingfu Fu9, Robin Elliott6, Gregory MacLennan6, Lee Ponsky8, Vikas Gulani3,10, Anant Madabhushi4. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA. rxs558@case.edu. 2. Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. 3. Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA. 4. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA. 5. Department of Public Health, Public Health Agency of Catalonia, Lleida, Catalonia, Spain. 6. Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA. 7. Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 8. Department of Urology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA. 9. Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA. 10. Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To explore the associations between T1 and T2 magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) measurements and corresponding tissue compartment ratios (TCRs) on whole mount histopathology of prostate cancer (PCa) and prostatitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective, IRB-approved, HIPAA-compliant cohort consisting of 14 PCa patients who underwent 3 T multiparametric MRI along with T1 and T2 MRF maps prior to radical prostatectomy was used. Correspondences between whole mount specimens and MRI and MRF were manually established. Prostatitis, PCa, and normal peripheral zone (PZ) regions of interest (ROIs) on pathology were segmented for TCRs of epithelium, lumen, and stroma using two U-net deep learning models. Corresponding ROIs were mapped to T2-weighted MRI (T2w), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and T1 and T2 MRF maps. Their correlations with TCRs were computed using Pearson's correlation coefficient (R). Statistically significant differences in means were assessed using one-way ANOVA. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences (p < 0.01) in means of TCRs and T1 and T2 MRF were observed between PCa, prostatitis, and normal PZ. A negative correlation was observed between T1 and T2 MRF and epithelium (R = - 0.38, - 0.44, p < 0.05) of PCa. T1 MRF was correlated in opposite directions with stroma of PCa and prostatitis (R = 0.35, - 0.44, p < 0.05). T2 MRF was positively correlated with lumen of PCa and prostatitis (R = 0.57, 0.46, p < 0.01). Mean T2 MRF showed significant differences (p < 0.01) between PCa and prostatitis across both transition zone (TZ) and PZ, while mean T1 MRF was significant (p = 0.02) in TZ. CONCLUSION: Significant associations between MRF (T1 in the TZ and T2 in the PZ) and tissue compartments on corresponding histopathology were observed. KEY POINTS: • Mean T2 MRF measurements and ADC within cancerous regions of interest dropped with increasing ISUP prognostic groups (IPG). • Mean T1 and T2 MRF measurements were significantly different (p < 0.001) across IPGs, prostatitis, and normal peripheral zone (NPZ). • T2 MRF showed stronger correlations in the peripheral zone, while T1 MRF showed stronger correlations in the transition zone with histopathology for prostate cancer.
OBJECTIVES: To explore the associations between T1 and T2 magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) measurements and corresponding tissue compartment ratios (TCRs) on whole mount histopathology of prostate cancer (PCa) and prostatitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective, IRB-approved, HIPAA-compliant cohort consisting of 14 PCa patients who underwent 3 T multiparametric MRI along with T1 and T2 MRF maps prior to radical prostatectomy was used. Correspondences between whole mount specimens and MRI and MRF were manually established. Prostatitis, PCa, and normal peripheral zone (PZ) regions of interest (ROIs) on pathology were segmented for TCRs of epithelium, lumen, and stroma using two U-net deep learning models. Corresponding ROIs were mapped to T2-weighted MRI (T2w), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and T1 and T2 MRF maps. Their correlations with TCRs were computed using Pearson's correlation coefficient (R). Statistically significant differences in means were assessed using one-way ANOVA. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences (p < 0.01) in means of TCRs and T1 and T2 MRF were observed between PCa, prostatitis, and normal PZ. A negative correlation was observed between T1 and T2 MRF and epithelium (R = - 0.38, - 0.44, p < 0.05) of PCa. T1 MRF was correlated in opposite directions with stroma of PCa and prostatitis (R = 0.35, - 0.44, p < 0.05). T2 MRF was positively correlated with lumen of PCa and prostatitis (R = 0.57, 0.46, p < 0.01). Mean T2 MRF showed significant differences (p < 0.01) between PCa and prostatitis across both transition zone (TZ) and PZ, while mean T1 MRF was significant (p = 0.02) in TZ. CONCLUSION: Significant associations between MRF (T1 in the TZ and T2 in the PZ) and tissue compartments on corresponding histopathology were observed. KEY POINTS: • Mean T2 MRF measurements and ADC within cancerous regions of interest dropped with increasing ISUP prognostic groups (IPG). • Mean T1 and T2 MRF measurements were significantly different (p < 0.001) across IPGs, prostatitis, and normal peripheral zone (NPZ). • T2 MRF showed stronger correlations in the peripheral zone, while T1 MRF showed stronger correlations in the transition zone with histopathology for prostate cancer.
Entities:
Keywords:
Deep learning; Magnetic resonance imaging; Prostatectomy; Prostatic neoplasms; Prostatitis
Authors: Baris Turkbey; Haresh Mani; Vijay Shah; Ardeshir R Rastinehad; Marcelino Bernardo; Thomas Pohida; Yuxi Pang; Dagane Daar; Compton Benjamin; Yolanda L McKinney; Hari Trivedi; Celene Chua; Gennady Bratslavsky; Joanna H Shih; W Marston Linehan; Maria J Merino; Peter L Choyke; Peter A Pinto Journal: J Urol Date: 2011-09-25 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Sarah Busch; Michael Hatridge; Michael Mößle; Whittier Myers; Travis Wong; Michael Mück; Kevin Chew; Kyle Kuchinsky; Jeffry Simko; John Clarke Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2012-01-31 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Seyed Saeid Dianat; H Ballentine Carter; Kenneth J Pienta; Edward M Schaeffer; Patricia K Landis; Jonathan I Epstein; Bruce J Trock; Katarzyna J Macura Journal: Urology Date: 2014-10-16 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Shoshana B Ginsburg; Ahmad Algohary; Shivani Pahwa; Vikas Gulani; Lee Ponsky; Hannu J Aronen; Peter J Boström; Maret Böhm; Anne-Maree Haynes; Phillip Brenner; Warick Delprado; James Thompson; Marley Pulbrock; Pekka Taimen; Robert Villani; Phillip Stricker; Ardeshir R Rastinehad; Ivan Jambor; Anant Madabhushi Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2016-12-19 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Dan Ma; Vikas Gulani; Nicole Seiberlich; Kecheng Liu; Jeffrey L Sunshine; Jeffrey L Duerk; Mark A Griswold Journal: Nature Date: 2013-03-14 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Mandi Wang; Jose A U Perucho; Peng Cao; Varut Vardhanabhuti; Di Cui; Yiang Wang; Pek-Lan Khong; Edward S Hui; Elaine Y P Lee Journal: Quant Imaging Med Surg Date: 2021-09
Authors: Riccardo Laudicella; Jan H Rüschoff; Niels J Rupp; Irene A Burger; Daniela A Ferraro; Muriel D Brada; Daniel Hausmann; Iliana Mebert; Alexander Maurer; Thomas Hermanns; Daniel Eberli Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2022-04-18 Impact factor: 10.057