Literature DB >> 28582269

Automated diagnosis of prostate cancer in multi-parametric MRI based on multimodal convolutional neural networks.

Minh Hung Le1, Jingyu Chen, Liang Wang, Zhiwei Wang, Wenyu Liu, Kwang-Ting Tim Cheng, Xin Yang.   

Abstract

Automated methods for prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis in multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (MP-MRIs) are critical for alleviating requirements for interpretation of radiographs while helping to improve diagnostic accuracy (Artan et al 2010 IEEE Trans. Image Process. 19 2444-55, Litjens et al 2014 IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 33 1083-92, Liu et al 2013 SPIE Medical Imaging (International Society for Optics and Photonics) p 86701G, Moradi et al 2012 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 35 1403-13, Niaf et al 2014 IEEE Trans. Image Process. 23 979-91, Niaf et al 2012 Phys. Med. Biol. 57 3833, Peng et al 2013a SPIE Medical Imaging (International Society for Optics and Photonics) p 86701H, Peng et al 2013b Radiology 267 787-96, Wang et al 2014 BioMed. Res. Int. 2014). This paper presents an automated method based on multimodal convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for two PCa diagnostic tasks: (1) distinguishing between cancerous and noncancerous tissues and (2) distinguishing between clinically significant (CS) and indolent PCa. Specifically, our multimodal CNNs effectively fuse apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) and T2-weighted MP-MRI images (T2WIs). To effectively fuse ADCs and T2WIs we design a new similarity loss function to enforce consistent features being extracted from both ADCs and T2WIs. The similarity loss is combined with the conventional classification loss functions and integrated into the back-propagation procedure of CNN training. The similarity loss enables better fusion results than existing methods as the feature learning processes of both modalities are mutually guided, jointly facilitating CNN to 'see' the true visual patterns of PCa. The classification results of multimodal CNNs are further combined with the results based on handcrafted features using a support vector machine classifier. To achieve a satisfactory accuracy for clinical use, we comprehensively investigate three critical factors which could greatly affect the performance of our multimodal CNNs but have not been carefully studied previously. (1) Given limited training data, how can these be augmented in sufficient numbers and variety for fine-tuning deep CNN networks for PCa diagnosis? (2) How can multimodal MP-MRI information be effectively combined in CNNs? (3) What is the impact of different CNN architectures on the accuracy of PCa diagnosis? Experimental results on extensive clinical data from 364 patients with a total of 463 PCa lesions and 450 identified noncancerous image patches demonstrate that our system can achieve a sensitivity of 89.85% and a specificity of 95.83% for distinguishing cancer from noncancerous tissues and a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 76.92% for distinguishing indolent PCa from CS PCa. This result is significantly superior to the state-of-the-art method relying on handcrafted features.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28582269     DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa7731

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  34 in total

1.  A collaborative computer aided diagnosis (C-CAD) system with eye-tracking, sparse attentional model, and deep learning.

Authors:  Naji Khosravan; Haydar Celik; Baris Turkbey; Elizabeth C Jones; Bradford Wood; Ulas Bagci
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2018-10-28       Impact factor: 8.545

Review 2.  Multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer diagnosis: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Armando Stabile; Francesco Giganti; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Samir S Taneja; Geert Villeirs; Inderbir S Gill; Clare Allen; Mark Emberton; Caroline M Moore; Veeru Kasivisvanathan
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 3.  Current Applications and Future Impact of Machine Learning in Radiology.

Authors:  Garry Choy; Omid Khalilzadeh; Mark Michalski; Synho Do; Anthony E Samir; Oleg S Pianykh; J Raymond Geis; Pari V Pandharipande; James A Brink; Keith J Dreyer
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Diagnosis of transition zone prostate cancer using T2-weighted (T2W) MRI: comparison of subjective features and quantitative shape analysis.

Authors:  Satheesh Krishna; Nicola Schieda; Matthew Df McInnes; Trevor A Flood; Rebecca E Thornhill
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Semi-automatic classification of prostate cancer on multi-parametric MR imaging using a multi-channel 3D convolutional neural network.

Authors:  Nader Aldoj; Steffen Lukas; Marc Dewey; Tobias Penzkofer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Education of prostate MR imaging: commentary.

Authors:  Bryce A Merritt; Spencer C Behr
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-12

7.  Prostate cancer detection from multi-institution multiparametric MRIs using deep convolutional neural networks.

Authors:  Yohan Sumathipala; Nathan Lay; Baris Turkbey; Clayton Smith; Peter L Choyke; Ronald M Summers
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-12-15

8.  Detecting glaucoma based on spectral domain optical coherence tomography imaging of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer: a comparison study between hand-crafted features and deep learning model.

Authors:  Ce Zheng; Xiaolin Xie; Longtao Huang; Binyao Chen; Jianling Yang; Jiewei Lu; Tong Qiao; Zhun Fan; Mingzhi Zhang
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-12-07       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  [Systematic evidence analysis for comparison of MRI-targeted biopsy versus systematic biopsy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer].

Authors:  A Sigle; C A Jilg; S Schmidt; A Miernik
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 0.639

10.  Differentiation of spinal metastases originated from lung and other cancers using radiomics and deep learning based on DCE-MRI.

Authors:  Ning Lang; Yang Zhang; Enlong Zhang; Jiahui Zhang; Daniel Chow; Peter Chang; Hon J Yu; Huishu Yuan; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 2.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.