Literature DB >> 28579619

Rates and Routes of Hysterectomy for Benign Indications in Austria 2002 - 2014.

Katharina Maria Edler1,2, Karl Tamussino1, Gerhard Fülöp3, Evi Reinstadler2, Walter Neunteufel2, Philipp Reif1, Rene Laky1, Thomas Aigmüller1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Rates and routes of hysterectomy have implications for quality, costs and training. This study analyzed rates of benign hysterectomy and surgical approaches for benign hysterectomy in Austria from 2002 to 2014.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a population-based retrospective observational study of coding data from all acute care hospitals (public and private) in Austria. Main outcome measures were numbers of women undergoing hysterectomy for benign indications in Austria per year and the route of hysterectomy for benign indications.
RESULTS: The number of benign hysterectomies performed per year declined from 10 675 in 2002 to 7747 in 2014, a decline of 27%. The use of vaginal hysterectomy was stable (53% and 47%, respectively). Use of laparoscopic techniques increased (5% in 2002, 32% in 2014) whereas use of abdominal hysterectomy decreased (41% and 20%, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Numbers of benign hysterectomies performed per year in Austria declined substantially between 2002 and 2014. Use of vaginal hysterectomy was stable at about 50%, whereas increased use of laparoscopic techniques was associated with lower rates of open hysterectomy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  abdominal hysterectomy; hysterectomy; hysterectomy rates; minimally invasive hysterectomy; routes of hysterectomy; vaginal hysterectomy

Year:  2017        PMID: 28579619      PMCID: PMC5444531          DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-107784

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd        ISSN: 0016-5751            Impact factor:   2.915


  25 in total

1.  Practice patterns and postoperative complications before and after US Food and Drug Administration safety communication on power morcellation.

Authors:  John A Harris; Carolyn W Swenson; Shitanshu Uppal; Neil Kamdar; Nichole Mahnert; Sawsan As-Sanie; Daniel M Morgan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Trends in number of hysterectomies performed in England for menorrhagia: examination of health episode statistics, 1989 to 2002-3.

Authors:  Peter C Reid; Faizah Mukri
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-02-04

3.  Rate of hysterectomy is lower among female doctors and lawyers' wives.

Authors:  G Domenighetti; A Casabianca
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-05-10

4.  Hysterectomy on benign indication in Denmark 1988-1998. A register based trend analysis.

Authors:  H Gimbel; A Settnes; A Tabor
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.636

5.  Effect of information campaign by the mass media on hysterectomy rates.

Authors:  G Domenighetti; P Luraschi; A Casabianca; F Gutzwiller; A Spinelli; E Pedrinis; F Repetto
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1988 Dec 24-31       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Hysterectomy in Germany: a DRG-based nationwide analysis, 2005-2006.

Authors:  Andreas Stang; Ray M Merrill; Oliver Kuss
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 5.594

7.  Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Cande V Ananth; Sharyn N Lewin; William M Burke; Yu-Shiang Lu; Alfred I Neugut; Thomas J Herzog; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Nationwide trends in the performance of inpatient hysterectomy in the United States.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Thomas J Herzog; Jennifer Tsui; Cande V Ananth; Sharyn N Lewin; Yu-Shiang Lu; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Changes in rates of hysterectomy and uterine conserving procedures for treatment of uterine leiomyoma.

Authors:  Gavin F Jacobson; Ruth E Shaber; Mary Anne Armstrong; Yun-Yi Hung
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 10.  Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.

Authors:  Johanna W M Aarts; Theodoor E Nieboer; Neil Johnson; Emma Tavender; Ray Garry; Ben Willem J Mol; Kirsten B Kluivers
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-08-12
View more
  4 in total

1.  Systematic review of urological injury during caesarean section and hysterectomy.

Authors:  Gavin Wei; Frances Harley; Michael O'Callaghan; James Adshead; Derek Hennessey; Ned Kinnear
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2022-10-17       Impact factor: 1.932

2.  1 vs 3 days laparoscopic suturing courses: is it feasible to design a valid training curriculum?

Authors:  I M Argay; T Lawrence; K Afors; G Centini; L Lazzeri; N Habib; N Amoruso; E Zupi; R Campo; A Wattiez
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2020-10-08

3.  Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate Use and the Development and Progression of Uterine Leiomyoma.

Authors:  Quaker E Harmon; Stacy A Patchel; Shanshan Zhao; David M Umbach; Tracy E Cooper; Donna D Baird
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 7.623

Review 4.  Preemptive local analgesia at vaginal hysterectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nadja Taumberger; Anna-Maria Schütz; Klaus Jeitler; Andrea Siebenhofer; Holger Simonis; Helmar Bornemann-Cimenti; Rene Laky; Karl Tamussino
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 1.932

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.