Literature DB >> 21904583

Hysterectomy in Germany: a DRG-based nationwide analysis, 2005-2006.

Andreas Stang1, Ray M Merrill, Oliver Kuss.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hysterectomy is among the more common surgical procedures in gynecology. The aim of this study was to calculate population-wide rates of hysterectomy across Germany and to obtain information on the different modalities of hysterectomy currently performed in German hospitals. This was done on the basis of nationwide DRG statistics (DRG = diagnosis-related groups) covering the years 2005-2006.
METHODS: We analyzed the nationwide DRG statistics for 2005 and 2006, in which we found 305 015 hysterectomies. Based on these data we calculated hysterectomy rates for the female population. We determined the indications for each hysterectomy with an algorithm based on the ICD-10 codes, and we categorized the operations on the basis of their OPS codes (OPS = Operationen- und Prozedurenschlüssel [Classification of Operations and Procedures]).
RESULTS: The overall rate of hysterectomy in Germany was 362 per 100 000 person-years. 55% of hysterectomies for benign diseases of the female genital tract were performed transvaginally. Bilateral ovariectomy was performed concomitantly in 23% of all hysterectomies, while 4% of all hysterectomies were subtotal. Hysterectomy rates varied considerably across federal states: the rate for benign disease was lowest in Hamburg (213.8 per 100 000 women per year) and highest in Mecklenburg-West Pomerania (361.9 per 100 000 women per year).
CONCLUSION: Hysterectomy rates vary markedly from one region to another. Moreover, even though recent studies have shown that bilateral ovariectomy is harmful to women under 50 who undergo hysterectomy for benign disease, it is still performed in 4% of all hysterectomies for benign indications in Germany.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21904583      PMCID: PMC3165925          DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2011.0508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int        ISSN: 1866-0452            Impact factor:   5.594


  26 in total

Review 1.  Postmenopausal status and early menopause as independent risk factors for cardiovascular disease: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Femke Atsma; Marie-Louise E L Bartelink; Diederick E Grobbee; Yvonne T van der Schouw
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Supravaginal uterine amputation in Denmark 1978-1988 and risk of cancer.

Authors:  H H Storm; I H Clemmensen; T Manders; L A Brinton
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Hysterectomy on benign indication in Denmark 1988-1998. A register based trend analysis.

Authors:  H Gimbel; A Settnes; A Tabor
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.636

4.  Effect of information campaign by the mass media on hysterectomy rates.

Authors:  G Domenighetti; P Luraschi; A Casabianca; F Gutzwiller; A Spinelli; E Pedrinis; F Repetto
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1988 Dec 24-31       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Regional variation in surgical procedure rates in Finland.

Authors:  I Keskimäki; S Aro; J Teperi
Journal:  Scand J Soc Med       Date:  1994-06

6.  Hysterectomy and sex of the gynecologist.

Authors:  G Domenighetti; P Luraschi; A Marazzi
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1985-12-05       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Nationwide rates of conversion from laparoscopic or vaginal hysterectomy to open abdominal hysterectomy in Germany.

Authors:  Andreas Stang; Ray M Merrill; Oliver Kuss
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-01-15       Impact factor: 8.082

8.  Micrographic surgery of skin cancer in German hospitals 2005-2006.

Authors:  A Stang; M Weichenthal
Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 6.166

9.  Hysterectomy: variations in rates across small areas and across physicians' practices.

Authors:  N P Roos
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Small-area variations in the use of common surgical procedures: an international comparison of New England, England, and Norway.

Authors:  K McPherson; J E Wennberg; O B Hovind; P Clifford
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1982-11-18       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  27 in total

1.  Outpatient hysterectomies were not included.

Authors:  Jost Klippel
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Hysterectomy is mostly unnecessary.

Authors:  Gernot Rott
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  Data not correctly calculated.

Authors:  Matthias David; Heribert Kentenich
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 5.594

4.  Effect of mammography screening on surgical treatment for breast cancer: a nationwide analysis of hospitalization rates in Germany 2005-2009.

Authors:  Andreas Stang; Vanessa Kääb-Sanyal; Hans-Werner Hense; Nikolaus Becker; Oliver Kuss
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 8.082

5.  Regional differences in the use of hysterectomy.

Authors:  Klaus Friese
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 5.594

6.  [Minimum caseload requirements in urologic oncology: not without evidence from health services research].

Authors:  J Huber; C Groeben; M P Wirth; F Hoffmann
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  Rates and Routes of Hysterectomy for Benign Indications in Austria 2002 - 2014.

Authors:  Katharina Maria Edler; Karl Tamussino; Gerhard Fülöp; Evi Reinstadler; Walter Neunteufel; Philipp Reif; Rene Laky; Thomas Aigmüller
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.915

8.  [Postoperative pain management after minimally invasive hysterectomy: thoracic epidural analgesia versus intravenous patient-controlled analgesia].

Authors:  M Hensel; J Frenzel; M Späker; E Keil; N Reinhold
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2013-09-22       Impact factor: 1.041

9.  Patterns of care in patients with cervical cancer 2012: results of a survey among German radiotherapy departments and out-patient health care centers.

Authors:  S Marnitz; C Köhler; A Rauer; A Schneider; V Budach; A Tsunoda; M Mangler
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-07-27       Impact factor: 3.621

10.  Aspects of Therapy for Cervical Cancer in Germany 2012 - Results from a Survey of German Gynaecological Hospitals.

Authors:  M Mangler; N Zech; A Schneider; C Köhler; S Marnitz
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.915

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.