| Literature DB >> 30429797 |
Layanna Cibelle de Sousa Assunção Carvalho1, Marcelo Conrado de Freitas2,3, Alexandre Sergio Silva4, Aline Camarão Telles Biasoto1,5, Maria do Carmo de Carvalho E Martins6, Rayane Carvalho de Moura1, Ana Karolinne da Silva Brito1, Acacio Salvador Veras E Silva6, Sérgio Luiz Galan Ribeiro7, Fabrício Eduardo Rossi7, Marcos Antônio Pereira Dos Santos6.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of Syzygium cumini (SC) nectar supplementation on performance, markers of oxidative stress, muscle damage, and psychological response in Handball players. Twenty-five young athletes (age = 18.6 ± 2.4 years) from an elite high school national level Brazilian Handball team were randomized into two study groups: SC/Jamelon nectar (SC, n = 12) and placebo (n = 13). The subjects ingested 10 mL/kg/day of Jamelon nectar or placebo 30 min before the training sessions and immediately after training cessation, for 28 days. Body mass index (BMI) and percentage of fat mass were assessed using bioelectrical impedance analysis. Biomarkers of oxidative stress were measured by lipid peroxidation, which was quantified by malondialdehyde (MDA). Total antioxidant capacity (TAC), creatine kinase (CK) activity, and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) were determined. The 20 m shuttle run test, vertical jump, and running anaerobic sprint test were assessed to verify performance and the fatigue index was calculated. The Profile of Mood States (POMS) questionnaire was used for psychological evaluation. Both groups demonstrated improved vertical jump performance and a decreased fatigue index over time but without significant differences between them regarding performance. There was statistically significance only for SC in CK, LDH, and MDA, and TAC was greater in the SC compared to placebo. Furthermore, only the SC group demonstrated improved mood disturbance and confusion after the intervention. In conclusion, the present study suggests that SC nectar supplementation reduced biomarkers of oxidative stress and muscle damage, and improved psychological response in young handball players.Entities:
Keywords: athletes; nutrition; performance; recovery; sport
Year: 2018 PMID: 30429797 PMCID: PMC6220600 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01508
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
Nutritional composition and HPLC-evaluated phenolic compounds of the supplemented beverages.
| Nutritional composition | Nectar of Jamelon (33 g of pulp + 4 g of sugar + + 100 mL of water) | Drink control (8 g of maltodextrin 100 mL of water) 100 mL of water) |
|---|---|---|
| Calories (kcal) | 30 | 30 |
| Carbohydrates (g) | 7.5 | 7.5 |
| Proteins (g) | 0.17 | 0 |
| Lipids (g) | 0.03 | 0 |
| Fibers (g) | 0.6 | 0 |
| Gallic acid | 2.61 ± 0.09 | – |
| Flavonoids (mg/L) | 0.61 ± 0.00 | – |
| (+) – Catechin | 0.53 ± 0.00 | – |
| (−) – Epicatechin | 1.39 ± 0.07 | – |
| (−) – Epicatechin gallate | 2.12 ± 0.05 | – |
| (−) – Epigallocatechin gallate | 0.74 ± 0.00 | – |
| Procyanidin A2 | 0.71 ± 0.00 | – |
| Procyanidin B1 | 0.46 ± 0.00 | – |
| Procyanidin B2 | ||
| Anthocyanins (mg/L) | 7.53 ± 0.16 | – |
| Cyanidin-3.5-di- | 1.44 ± 0.13 | – |
| Cyanidin-3- | 205.7 ± 2.51 | – |
| Malvidine-3.5-di- | 48.85 ± 1.08 | – |
Comparison between placebo and supplementation group on dietary intake, anthropometry and performance.
| Variables | Placebo ( | SC ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | Post | Baseline | Post | |
| CHO (g) | 900.7 ± 413.1 | 1153 ± 545.8 | 1041 ± 341.7 | 1430 ± 665.1 |
| PRO (g) | 461.9 ± 172.5 | 404.5 ± 204.2 | 404.2 ± 129 | 486.1 ± 188.2 |
| FAT (g) | 590.3 ± 388.5 | 613.3 ± 295.7 | 702 ± 247.9 | 869.8 ± 389.8 |
| Total Intake (kcal) | 1963 ± 775 | 2265 ± 865 | 2116 ± 732 | 2562 ± 913 |
| Vitamin A (μg ER) | 346.5 ± 266.9 | 311.6 ± 184.9 | 280.9 ± 127.9 | 337.4 ± 256.6 |
| Vitamin C (mg) | 21.8 ± 16.6 | 23.4 ± 18.6 | 30.9 ± 7.7 | 36.4 ± 16.3 |
| Vitamin E (mg) | 13.1 ± 6.7 | 19.2 ± 9.2 | 12.2 ± 7.8 | 14.6 ± 3.3 |
| Copper (mg) | 0.9 ± 0.5 | 1.1 ± 0.4 | 0.9 ± 0.2 | 1.3 ± 0.5 |
| Iron (mg) | 13.2 ± 6.1 | 16.8 ± 5.7 | 14.9 ± 3.2 | 20.5 ± 9.0 |
| Zinc (mg) | 11.3 ± 7.2 | 9.8 ± 3.2 | 12.5 ± 3.4 | 13.9 ± 7.4 |
| Selenium (μg) | 102.9 ± 44.8 | 106.6 ± 39.5 | 108.3 ± 24.4 | 99.9 ± 36.9 |
| Body mass (kg) | 71.2 ± 7.1 | 71.9 ± 7.1 | 70.7 ± 7.6 | 70.8 ± 7.9 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22.1 ± 1.8 | 22.1 ± 1.7 | 22.2 ± 2.6 | 22.3 ± 2.5 |
| Body fat (%) | 18.0 ± 3.5 | 17.9 ± 3.5 | 18.1 ± 4.5 | 18.1 ± 4.6 |
| VO2max (mL⋅kg−1⋅min−1) | 45.7 ± 3.8 | 46.5 ± 5.4 | 48.3 ± 6.3 | 49.1 ± 6.9 |
| RAST (W/kg−1) | 8.6 ± 1.2 | 8.7 ± 1.2 | 7.8 ± 1.3 | 8.1 ± 1.1 |
| Fatigue index (W⋅seg−1) | 8.1 ± 2.4 | 6.8 ± 2.7¥ | 6.7 ± 2.3 | 5.7 ± 1.9¥ |
| Vertical Jump (cm) | 36.2 ± 5.6 | 37.2 ± 5.2¥ | 35.8 ± 3.3 | 36.3 ± 3.2¥ |
Comparison between placebo and supplementation groups on muscle damage and oxidative stress.
| Variables | Placebo ( | SC ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | Post | Baseline | Post | |
| CK (U/L) | 179.6 ± 52.2 | 186.1 ± 60.5 | 210.2 ± 65.34 | 150.2 ± 58.2* |
| LDH (U/L) | 292.7 ± 45.3 | 296.8 ± 55.8 | 331.9 ± 52.4 | 288.9 ± 37.4* |
| MDA (μM) | 4.0 ± 1.0 | 4.3 ± 0.7 | 4.6 ± 1.1 | 3.2 ± 0.9* |
| TAC (%) | 17.2 ± 2.8 | 17.7 ± 2.3 | 18.3 ± 3.1 | 21.8 ± 2.7*$ |
Comparison between placebo and supplementation groups on the psychological response.
| Variables | Placebo ( | SC ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | Post | Baseline | Post | |
| Mood disturbance | 99.9 ± 12.4 | 97.7 ± 12.7 | 100.7 ± 17.0 | 89.7 ± 11.6* |
| Confusion | −1.5 ± 2.1 | −1.6 ± 1.8 | −1.7 ± 2.6 | −3.8 ± 2.1* |
| Tension | −0.31 ± 2.1 | −0.46 ± 2.0 | 0.25 ± 2.9 | −1.1 ± 1.7 |
| Depression | 5.1 ± 4.6 | 4.8 ± 5.0 | 3.9 ± 7.8 | 2.2 ± 1.6 |
| Hostility | 5.1 ± 2.1 | 5.0 ± 2.4 | 4.2 ± 4.3 | 3.2 ± 2.3 |
| Vigor | 13.8 ± 6.8 | 14.1 ± 5.6 | 12.0 ± 6.7 | 15.8 ± 4.7 |
| Fatigue | 5.1 ± 3.3 | 4.1 ± 2.6 | 6.2 ± 5.2 | 4.9 ± 3.7 |