Literature DB >> 28573511

Early detection: the impact of genomics.

M C J van Lanschot1, L J W Bosch1, M de Wit1, B Carvalho1, G A Meijer2.   

Abstract

The field of genomics has shifted our view on disease development by providing insights in the molecular and functional processes encoded in the genome. In the case of cancer, many alterations in the DNA accumulate that enable tumor growth or even metastatic dissemination. Identification of molecular signatures that define different stages of progression towards cancer can enable early tumor detection. In this review, the impact of genomics will be addressed using early detection of colorectal cancer (CRC) as an example. Increased understanding of the adenoma-to-carcinoma progression has led to the discovery of several diagnostic biomarkers. This combined with technical advancements, has facilitated the development of molecular tests for non-invasive early CRC detection in stool and blood samples. Even though several tests have already made it to clinical practice, sensitivity and specificity for the detection of precancerous lesions still need improvement. Besides the diagnostic qualities, also the accuracy of the intermediate endpoint is an important issue on how the effectiveness of a novel test is perceived. Here, progression biomarkers may provide a more precise measure than the currently used morphologically based features. Similar developments in biomarker use for early detection have taken place in other cancer types.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomarker; Colorectal cancer; Genomics; Screening; Stool

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28573511     DOI: 10.1007/s00428-017-2159-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Virchows Arch        ISSN: 0945-6317            Impact factor:   4.064


  72 in total

Review 1.  Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer: biomarkers for improved prevention efforts.

Authors:  Vikrant V Sahasrabuddhe; Patricia Luhn; Nicolas Wentzensen
Journal:  Future Microbiol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.165

2.  Chromatid cohesion defects may underlie chromosome instability in human colorectal cancers.

Authors:  Thomas D Barber; Kirk McManus; Karen W Y Yuen; Marcelo Reis; Giovanni Parmigiani; Dong Shen; Irene Barrett; Yasaman Nouhi; Forrest Spencer; Sanford Markowitz; Victor E Velculescu; Kenneth W Kinzler; Bert Vogelstein; Christoph Lengauer; Philip Hieter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-02-25       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Molecular tests for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Linda J W Bosch; Beatriz Carvalho; Remond J A Fijneman; Connie R Jimenez; Herbert M Pinedo; Manon van Engeland; Gerrit A Meijer
Journal:  Clin Colorectal Cancer       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 4.481

Review 4.  Cell-free nucleic acids as biomarkers in cancer patients.

Authors:  Heidi Schwarzenbach; Dave S B Hoon; Klaus Pantel
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 60.716

5.  Single-tube analysis of DNA methylation with silica superparamagnetic beads.

Authors:  Vasudev J Bailey; Yi Zhang; Brian P Keeley; Chao Yin; Kristen L Pelosky; Malcolm Brock; Stephen B Baylin; James G Herman; Tza-Huei Wang
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 8.327

6.  Comparative genomic hybridization reveals a specific pattern of chromosomal gains and losses during the genesis of colorectal tumors.

Authors:  T Ried; R Knutzen; R Steinbeck; H Blegen; E Schröck; K Heselmeyer; S du Manoir; G Auer
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 5.006

7.  The radioimmunoassay of circulating carcinoembryonic antigen of the human digestive system.

Authors:  D M Thomson; J Krupey; S O Freedman; P Gold
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Use of blood-based biomarkers for early diagnosis and surveillance of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Ganepola Ap Ganepola; Joel Nizin; John R Rutledge; David H Chang
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2014-04-15

Review 9.  The significance of unstable chromosomes in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Harith Rajagopalan; Martin A Nowak; Bert Vogelstein; Christoph Lengauer
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 60.716

10.  Multitarget stool DNA testing for colorectal-cancer screening.

Authors:  Thomas F Imperiale; David F Ransohoff; Steven H Itzkowitz; Theodore R Levin; Philip Lavin; Graham P Lidgard; David A Ahlquist; Barry M Berger
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Genomics of Particulate Matter Exposure Associated Cardiopulmonary Disease: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Julia Citron; Emma Willcocks; George Crowley; Sophia Kwon; Anna Nolan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Multitarget Stool DNA Test Performance in an Average-Risk Colorectal Cancer Screening Population.

Authors:  L J W Bosch; V Melotte; S Mongera; K L J Daenen; V M H Coupé; S T van Turenhout; E M Stoop; T R de Wijkerslooth; C J J Mulder; C Rausch; E J Kuipers; E Dekker; M J Domanico; G P Lidgard; B M Berger; M van Engeland; B Carvalho; G A Meijer
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Colorectal Cancer Screening Methods and Molecular Markers for Early Detection.

Authors:  Ziwei Wu; You Li; Yibin Zhang; Hui Hu; Tangwei Wu; Shuiyi Liu; Weiqun Chen; Shenggao Xie; Zhongxin Lu
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec

4.  Integrative Analysis of DNA Methylation and Gene Expression Profiles Identifies Colorectal Cancer-Related Diagnostic Biomarkers.

Authors:  Mingyue Xu; Lijun Yuan; Yan Wang; Shuo Chen; Lin Zhang; Xipeng Zhang
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 2.874

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.