BACKGROUND: DNA promoter methylation is a signature for the silencing of tumor suppressor genes. Most widely used methods to detect DNA methylation involve 3 separate, independent processes: DNA extraction, bisulfite conversion, and methylation detection via a PCR method, such as methylation-specific PCR (MSP). This method includes many disconnected steps with associated losses of material, potentially reducing the analytical sensitivity required for analysis of challenging clinical samples. METHODS: Methylation on beads (MOB) is a new technique that integrates DNA extraction, bisulfite conversion, and PCR in a single tube via the use of silica superparamagnetic beads (SSBs) as a common DNA carrier for facilitating cell debris removal and buffer exchange throughout the entire process. In addition, PCR buffer is used to directly elute bisulfite-treated DNA from SSBs for subsequent target amplifications. The diagnostic sensitivity of MOB was evaluated by methylation analysis of the CDKN2A [cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (melanoma, p16, inhibits CDK4); also known as p16(INK4a)] promoter in serum DNA of lung cancer patients and compared with that of conventional methods. RESULTS: Methylation analysis consisting of DNA extraction followed by bisulfite conversion and MSP was successfully carried out within 9 h in a single tube. The median pre-PCR DNA yield was 6.61-fold higher with the MOB technique than with conventional techniques. Furthermore, MOB increased the diagnostic sensitivity in our analysis of the CDKN2A promoter in patient serum by successfully detecting methylation in 74% of cancer patients, vs the 45% detection rate obtained with conventional techniques. CONCLUSIONS: The MOB technique successfully combined 3 processes into a single tube, thereby allowing ease in handling and an increased detection throughput. The increased pre-PCR yield in MOB allowed efficient, diagnostically sensitive methylation detection.
BACKGROUND: DNA promoter methylation is a signature for the silencing of tumor suppressor genes. Most widely used methods to detect DNA methylation involve 3 separate, independent processes: DNA extraction, bisulfite conversion, and methylation detection via a PCR method, such as methylation-specific PCR (MSP). This method includes many disconnected steps with associated losses of material, potentially reducing the analytical sensitivity required for analysis of challenging clinical samples. METHODS: Methylation on beads (MOB) is a new technique that integrates DNA extraction, bisulfite conversion, and PCR in a single tube via the use of silica superparamagnetic beads (SSBs) as a common DNA carrier for facilitating cell debris removal and buffer exchange throughout the entire process. In addition, PCR buffer is used to directly elute bisulfite-treated DNA from SSBs for subsequent target amplifications. The diagnostic sensitivity of MOB was evaluated by methylation analysis of the CDKN2A [cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (melanoma, p16, inhibits CDK4); also known as p16(INK4a)] promoter in serum DNA of lung cancerpatients and compared with that of conventional methods. RESULTS: Methylation analysis consisting of DNA extraction followed by bisulfite conversion and MSP was successfully carried out within 9 h in a single tube. The median pre-PCR DNA yield was 6.61-fold higher with the MOB technique than with conventional techniques. Furthermore, MOB increased the diagnostic sensitivity in our analysis of the CDKN2A promoter in patient serum by successfully detecting methylation in 74% of cancerpatients, vs the 45% detection rate obtained with conventional techniques. CONCLUSIONS: The MOB technique successfully combined 3 processes into a single tube, thereby allowing ease in handling and an increased detection throughput. The increased pre-PCR yield in MOB allowed efficient, diagnostically sensitive methylation detection.
Authors: M Frommer; L E McDonald; D S Millar; C M Collis; F Watt; G W Grigg; P L Molloy; C L Paul Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1992-03-01 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: C A Eads; K D Danenberg; K Kawakami; L B Saltz; C Blake; D Shibata; P V Danenberg; P W Laird Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2000-04-15 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Vasudev J Bailey; Hariharan Easwaran; Yi Zhang; Elizabeth Griffiths; Steven A Belinsky; James G Herman; Stephen B Baylin; Hetty E Carraway; Tza-Huei Wang Journal: Genome Res Date: 2009-05-14 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: J G Herman; A Merlo; L Mao; R G Lapidus; J P Issa; N E Davidson; D Sidransky; S B Baylin Journal: Cancer Res Date: 1995-10-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Haitham A Badr; Dina M M AlSadek; Motawa E El-Houseini; Christopher T Saeui; Mohit P Mathew; Kevin J Yarema; Hafiz Ahmed Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2016-11-25 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: Bin Liu; Julio Ricarte Filho; Apurva Mallisetty; Cassandra Villani; Anastasia Kottorou; Kristen Rodgers; Chen Chen; Tomoaki Ito; Kyla Holmes; Nicole Gastala; Klara Valyi-Nagy; Odile David; Ron C Gaba; Christian Ascoli; Mary Pasquinelli; Lawrence E Feldman; Malek G Massad; Tza-Huei Wang; Ignacio Jusue-Torres; Enrico Benedetti; Robert A Winn; Malcolm V Brock; James G Herman; Alicia Hulbert Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2020-05-19 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Stéphanie L Gaillard; Marianna Zahurak; Anup Sharma; Jennifer N Durham; Kim A Reiss; Susan Sartorius-Mergenthaler; Melinda Downs; Nicole M Anders; Nita Ahuja; Michelle A Rudek; Nilofer Azad Journal: Cancer Date: 2019-04-23 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Brian Keeley; Alejandro Stark; Thomas R Pisanic; Ruby Kwak; Yi Zhang; John Wrangle; Stephen Baylin; James Herman; Nita Ahuja; Malcolm V Brock; Tza-Huei Wang Journal: Clin Chim Acta Date: 2013-08-01 Impact factor: 3.786
Authors: Joo Mi Yi; Angela A Guzzetta; Vasudev J Bailey; Stephanie R Downing; Leander Van Neste; Katherine B Chiappinelli; Brian P Keeley; Alejandro Stark; Alexander Herrera; Christopher Wolfgang; Emmanouil P Pappou; Christine A Iacobuzio-Donahue; Michael G Goggins; James G Herman; Tza-Huei Wang; Stephen B Baylin; Nita Ahuja Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2013-10-02 Impact factor: 12.531