| Literature DB >> 28571567 |
Luis Miguel Serrano-Bermúdez1, Andrés Fernando González Barrios2, Costas D Maranas3, Dolly Montoya4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The increase in glycerol obtained as a byproduct of biodiesel has encouraged the production of new industrial products, such as 1,3-propanediol (PDO), using biotechnological transformation via bacteria like Clostridium butyricum. However, despite the increasing role of Clostridium butyricum as a bio-production platform, its metabolism remains poorly modeled.Entities:
Keywords: 1,3-propanediol; Clostridium butyricum; Genome-scale metabolic model; Objective function
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28571567 PMCID: PMC5455137 DOI: 10.1186/s12918-017-0434-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Syst Biol ISSN: 1752-0509
Main features of the iCbu641 metabolic network
| Feature | Number | |
|---|---|---|
| Genes | 641 | |
| Enzymes | 365 | |
| Total Reactions | 891 | |
| Cytosolic reactionsa | 727 | |
| Transport reactions | 86 | |
| Exchange reactions | 78 | |
| Total Metabolites | 701 | |
| Blocked metabolites | 63 | |
aIncludes 17 simplified biomass and macromolecule synthesis reactions [45] and 59 reactions added in the curation
Fig. 1Distribution of cytosolic reactions in the iCbu641 GSM model by functional pathway. Notation (■) Gene-Associated reactions (■) Non Gene-Associated reactions
Fig. 2Robustness analyses in function of glycerol uptake flux. a Specific growth rate μ and b PDO secretion flux v Notation: Experimental data from Solomon et al. [44] at (●) glycerol limitation and (○) glycerol excess. FBA predictions using: biomass maximization (Blue Line), biomass maximization per enzyme usage (Red Line) and biomass maximization while minimizing both enzyme usage and ATP production (Green Line)
Comparison of the experimental and simulated yields (mol/mol) of Clostridium butyricum W5 cultured in glucose [56]
| Product | Experimental Yield | Predicted feasible range |
|---|---|---|
| Biomass | 0.0270 | 0.0279 (0.0228–0.0330) |
| Acetate | 0.172 | 0.574 (0–1.053) |
| Lactate | 0.566 | 0.179 (0–0.773) |
| Butyrate | 0.295 | 0.114 (0–0.454) |
| H2 | 1.325 | 0.661 (0.046–1.345) |
| Ethanol | 0.043 | 0.215 (0–0.714) |
Comparison experimental and simulated yields (mol/mol) of Clostridium butyricum TM-9A cultured in different carbohydrates [65]
| Carbohydrate | Experimental Yields | Predicted Yields | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YX/S a | YH2/S | YX/S a | Feasible range YH2/S | |
| Arabinose | 2.5% | 0.067 | 6.7% | 0.204–1.101 |
| Ribose | 25.3% | 0.843 | 6.7% | 0.236–1.100 |
| Xylose | 32.3% | 0.589 | 11.1% | 0.327–1.406 |
| Mannose | 30.8% | 0.668 | 36.2% | 0.046–1.346 |
| Fructose | 32.2% | 0.848 | 37.2% | 0.092–1.374 |
| Galactose | 35.9% | 0.864 | 29.1% | 0.478–1.711 |
| Cellobiose | 35.9% | 0.945 | 59.9% | 0.141–2.468 |
| Trehalose | 65.7% | 1.612 | 72.3% | 0.030–2.485 |
| Sucrose | 74.9% | 1.494 | 70.1% | 0–2.323 |
| Raffinose | 100.0% | 2.716 | 100.0% | 0–3.141 |
aBiomass yields were normalized based on the raffinose value
Comparison experimental and simulated yields of wild type and mutant strains of Clostridium butyricum W5 cultured in glucose [71]
| Product | Experimental yields | Simulated yields (FVA range) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wild strain | Mutant strain | Wild strain (FBA) | Mutant strain (ROOM) | |
| H2 | 1.25a | 0.69 | 0.661 (0.046–1.345) | 0.694 (0–1.787) |
| Ethanol | 0.18 | 3.31 a | 0.215 (0–0.714) | 0.680 (0–1.069) |
| Biomassb | 100% | 99.2%a | 100% | 95.0% |
aValues calculated from information reported by Cai et al. [71]
bYields reported as percentages based on the wild type strain
Comparison experimental and simulated yields of wild type and mutant strains of Clostridium sp. IBUN 158B cultured in glycerol [73]
| Strain | Experimental yields | Simulated yields (FVA range) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YX/S a | YPDO/S | YX/S a | YPDO/S | |
| Wild strain | 100.0 ± 8% | 0.538 ± 0.047 | 100% | 0.588 (0.479–0.656) |
| Δ | 46.7 ± 9% | 0.465 ± 0.031 | 75.8% | 0.610 (0.478–0.721) |
| Δ | 61.6 ± 3% | 0.579 ± 0.021 | 98.9% | 0.595 (0.489–0.659) |
| Δ | Not available b | 95.2% | 0.572 (0.448–0.656) | |
aBiomass Yields were normalized based on the wild type strain value
bData not measured experimentally by Montoya [73]
Fig. 3Pearson correlation coefficients of biomass and PDO yields to biomass precursors. Notation: (■) YX/S correlation. (■) YPDO/S correlation. Pearson values were calculated using a normalized random distribution of biomass precursors; a relative standard distribution of 30% was employed in all precursors. The covariance analyses were made with 9035 random combinations of precursor compositions
Fig. 4PDO yields using glucose and glycerol co-fermentation. a Comparison of experimental (scatter dots with standard deviation as error bars [78]) and FVA range prediction (Vertical boxes) of YPDO/S in the function of the glucose/glycerol uptake flux ratio. b Maximum YPDO/S predicted using FVA at different glucose and glycerol uptake fluxes. A ratio of glucose/glycerol uptake fluxes greater than or equal to 0.375 allows a complete conversion of glycerol to PDO (YPDO/S = 1). By contrast, PDO production is 0 without glycerol uptake flux (YPDO/S = 0)