Literature DB >> 8595778

Role of bone substitutes.

J O Hollinger1, J Brekke, E Gruskin, D Lee.   

Abstract

Approximately 500 million years ago, the Paleozoic era heralded an evolutionary marvel: the skeleton. Unique to this evolutionary development was the capacity for regeneration: the physiologic renewal of embryologically derived tissue. Many of the cellular and molecular components for bone regeneration have been identified (bone morphogenetic proteins), and their therapeutic manipulation will become common clinical practice. Moreover, synthetic materials produced in the laboratory and novel bone derivatives will be used to exploit the skeleton's capacity to regenerate and repair. The concept of repair may be viewed as the restoration of form and function to deficient osseous tissue. Materials that provoke repair can be categorized broadly as bone substitutes. In this review, bone substitutes are grouped into 2 categories, polymers and ceramics, and each is subclassified as biodegradable or nonbiodegradable. Examples of these materials are provided as well as some of their liabilities and virtues.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8595778     DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199603000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  48 in total

1.  Macroporous glass-ceramic materials with bioactive properties.

Authors:  C Vitale-Brovarone; S Di Nunzio; O Bretcanu; E Verné
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  The influence of polymer blend composition on the degradation of polymer/hydroxyapatite biomaterials.

Authors:  A S Dunn; P G Campbell; K G Marra
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Bone formation induced by calcium phosphate ceramics in soft tissue of dogs: a comparative study between porous alpha-TCP and beta-TCP.

Authors:  H Yuan; J D De Bruijn; Y Li; J Feng; Z Yang; K De Groot; X Zhang
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Bone morphogenetic protein and ceramic-induced osteogenesis.

Authors:  H Yuan; P Zou; Z Yang; X Zhang; J D De Bruijn; K De Groot
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  [Not Available].

Authors:  B Wittner
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 1.154

6.  Bioceramics composition modulate resorption of human osteoclasts.

Authors:  Y Ramaswamy; D R Haynes; G Berger; R Gildenhaar; H Lucas; C Holding; H Zreiqat
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.896

7.  The clinical use of allografts, demineralized bone matrices, synthetic bone graft substitutes and osteoinductive growth factors: a survey study.

Authors:  Mathias P G Bostrom; Daniel A Seigerman
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2005-09

Review 8.  [Osteoinduction and -reparation].

Authors:  N R Kübler
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  1997-02

9.  ILLUMINATING THE ROLE OF AGGLOMERATES ON CRITICAL PHYSICOCHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF AMORPHOUS CALCIUM PHOSPHATE COMPOSITES.

Authors:  J N R O'Donnell; J M Antonucci; D Skrtic
Journal:  J Compos Mater       Date:  2008-01-01       Impact factor: 2.591

10.  Scaffold stiffness influences cell behavior: opportunities for skeletal tissue engineering.

Authors:  Roel G M Breuls; Timothy U Jiya; Theo H Smit
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2008-05-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.