Literature DB >> 28565659

HIERARCHICAL ANALYSIS OF INBREEDING DEPRESSION IN PEROMYSCUS POLIONOTUS.

Robert C Lacy1, Glen Alaks1, Allison Walsh1.   

Abstract

The severity of inbreeding depression appears to vary among taxa, but few ecological or other patterns have been identified that predict accurately which taxa are most sensitive to inbreeding. To examine the causes of heterogeneity in inbreeding depression, the effects of inbreeding on reproduction, survival, and growth were measured in three replicate experimental stocks for each of three subspecies of Peromyscus polionotus mice. Inbreeding of the dam reduced the probability of breeding, the probability of producing a second litter, and litter size. Inbreeding of the litter caused depression of litter size, juvenile viability, and mass at weaning, and caused an increase in the within-litter variance in mass. In spite of differences between the subspecies in natural population sizes, genetic variation, and mean rates of reproduction and survival, all variation observed between experimental populations in their responses to inbreeding could be attributed to random founder effects. The genetic load of deleterious alleles in each replicate was unequally partitioned among its founder pairs, and different founders contributed to the load affecting different fitness components. Thus, inbreeding depression for any one fitness component, in our experimental environment, must be due to relatively few deleterious alleles with major effects. Genetic loads so comprised would be expected to diverge among natural populations due to both random drift and selective removal of recessive deleterious alleles during population bottlenecks. The near universality of inbreeding depression would be maintained, however, if different alleles contribute to inbreeding depression of different fitness components and in different environments. © 1996 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Founder effect; Peromyscus polionotus.; genetic load; inbreeding depression

Year:  1996        PMID: 28565659     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1996.tb03609.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  12 in total

1.  Genomic sweep and potential genetic rescue during limiting environmental conditions in an isolated wolf population.

Authors:  Jennifer R Adams; Leah M Vucetich; Philip W Hedrick; Rolf O Peterson; John A Vucetich
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Development of a highly fecund inbred strain of mice.

Authors:  Marte Holt; Frank W Nicholas; John W James; Chris Moran; Ian C A Martin
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.957

3.  The crucial role of genome-wide genetic variation in conservation.

Authors:  Marty Kardos; Ellie E Armstrong; Sarah W Fitzpatrick; Samantha Hauser; Philip W Hedrick; Joshua M Miller; David A Tallmon; W Chris Funk
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Male-male competition magnifies inbreeding depression in wild house mice.

Authors:  S Meagher; D J Penn; W K Potts
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-03-28       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  What the Inbred Scandinavian Wolf Population Tells Us about the Nature of Conservation.

Authors:  Jannikke Räikkönen; John A Vucetich; Leah M Vucetich; Rolf O Peterson; Michael P Nelson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Investigation of regions impacting inbreeding depression and their association with the additive genetic effect for United States and Australia Jersey dairy cattle.

Authors:  Jeremy T Howard; Mekonnen Haile-Mariam; Jennie E Pryce; Christian Maltecca
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  Founder-specific inbreeding depression affects racing performance in Thoroughbred horses.

Authors:  Evelyn T Todd; Simon Y W Ho; Peter C Thomson; Rachel A Ang; Brandon D Velie; Natasha A Hamilton
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  A multivariate analysis with direct additive and inbreeding depression load effects.

Authors:  Luis Varona; Juan Altarriba; Carlos Moreno; María Martínez-Castillero; Joaquim Casellas
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 4.297

9.  Untangling the hybrid nature of modern pig genomes: a mosaic derived from biogeographically distinct and highly divergent Sus scrofa populations.

Authors:  Mirte Bosse; Hendrik-Jan Megens; Ole Madsen; Laurent A F Frantz; Yogesh Paudel; Richard P M A Crooijmans; Martien A M Groenen
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 6.185

10.  Evolution of Peromyscus leucopus mice in response to a captive environment.

Authors:  Robert C Lacy; Glen Alaks; Allison Walsh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.