Literature DB >> 28565213

THE POPULATION GENETICS OF ADAPTATION: THE DISTRIBUTION OF FACTORS FIXED DURING ADAPTIVE EVOLUTION.

H Allen Orr1.   

Abstract

We know very little about the genetic basis of adaptation. Indeed, we can make no theoretical predictions, however heuristic, about the distribution of phenotypic effects among factors fixed during adaptation nor about the expected "size" of the largest factor fixed. Study of this problem requires taking into account that populations gradually approach a phenotypic optimum during adaptation via the stepwise substitution of favorable mutations. Using Fisher's geometric model of adaptation, I analyze this approach to the optimum, and derive an approximate solution to the size distribution of factors fixed during adaptation. I further generalize these results to allow the input of any distribution of mutational effects. The distribution of factors fixed during adaptation assumes a pleasingly simple, exponential form. This result is remarkably insensitive to changes in the fitness function and in the distribution of mutational effects. An exponential trend among factors fixed appears to be a general property of adaptation toward a fixed optimum. © 1998 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Keywords:  Adaptation; Fisher's model; natural selection; phenotypic evolution; quantitative trait locus

Year:  1998        PMID: 28565213     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1998.tb01823.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  124 in total

1.  Heterozygote advantage as a natural consequence of adaptation in diploids.

Authors:  Diamantis Sellis; Benjamin J Callahan; Dmitri A Petrov; Philipp W Messer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Real time forecasting of near-future evolution.

Authors:  Philip J Gerrish; Paul D Sniegowski
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 3.  Perspectives on the genetic architecture of divergence in body shape in sticklebacks.

Authors:  Duncan T Reid; Catherine L Peichel
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2010-04-26       Impact factor: 3.326

4.  Molecular evolution, mutation size and gene pleiotropy: a geometric reexamination.

Authors:  Pablo Razeto-Barry; Javier Díaz; Darko Cotoras; Rodrigo A Vásquez
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  A new method for estimating effect size distribution and heritability from genome-wide association summary results.

Authors:  Lei Zhang; Yue-Ping Shen; Wen-Zhu Hu; Shu Ran; Yong Lin; Shu-Feng Lei; Yong-Hong Zhang; Christopher J Papasian; Nengjun Yi; Yu-Fang Pei
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  The distribution of beneficial mutant effects under strong selection.

Authors:  Rowan D H Barrett; Leithen K M'Gonigle; Sarah P Otto
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-10-08       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Determining the factors driving selective effects of new nonsynonymous mutations.

Authors:  Christian D Huber; Bernard Y Kim; Clare D Marsden; Kirk E Lohmueller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Hitchhiking both ways: effect of two interfering selective sweeps on linked neutral variation.

Authors:  Luis-Miguel Chevin; Sylvain Billiard; Frédéric Hospital
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Evolutionary inevitability of sexual antagonism.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  QTL mapping reveals a two-step model for the evolutionary reduction of inner microsporangia within the asteracean genus Microseris.

Authors:  O Gailing; K Bachmann
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 5.699

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.