Literature DB >> 17028334

The distribution of beneficial mutant effects under strong selection.

Rowan D H Barrett1, Leithen K M'Gonigle, Sarah P Otto.   

Abstract

For a general theory of adaptation, it is essential to know the distribution of fitness effects of beneficial mutations. Recent theoretical and empirical studies have made considerable progress in determining the characteristics of this distribution. To date, the experiments have largely verified the theoretical predictions. Despite the fact that the theoretical work has assumed small selection coefficients, strong selection has been observed in some experiments, especially those involving novel environments. Here, we derive the distribution of fitness effects among fixed beneficial mutants without the restriction of low selection coefficients. The fate of strongly favored alleles is less affected by stochastic drift while rare, causing the distribution of fitness effects among fixed beneficial mutations to reflect more closely the distribution among all newly arising beneficial mutations. We also find that when many alleles compete for fixation within an asexual population (clonal interference), the beneficial effects of a newly fixed mutant cannot be well estimated because of the high number of subsequent mutations that arise within the genome, regardless of whether selection is strong or weak.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17028334      PMCID: PMC1698630          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.106.062406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  33 in total

1.  Fitness effects of advantageous mutations in evolving Escherichia coli populations.

Authors:  M Imhof; C Schlotterer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-01-30       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Clonal interference and the evolution of RNA viruses.

Authors:  R Miralles; P J Gerrish; A Moya; S F Elena
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-09-10       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  The rate of adaptation in asexuals.

Authors:  H A Orr
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Big-benefit mutations in a bacteriophage inhibited with heat.

Authors:  J J Bull; M R Badgett; H A Wichman
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  Detecting the undetected: estimating the total number of loci underlying a quantitative trait.

Authors:  S P Otto; C D Jones
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  The rhythm of microbial adaptation.

Authors:  P Gerrish
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-09-20       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Evaluating the impact of population bottlenecks in experimental evolution.

Authors:  Lindi M Wahl; Philip J Gerrish; Ivan Saika-Voivod
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  The population genetics of adaptation: the adaptation of DNA sequences.

Authors:  H Allen Orr
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Fitness effects of fixed beneficial mutations in microbial populations.

Authors:  Daniel E Rozen; J Arjan G M de Visser; Philip J Gerrish
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2002-06-25       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  The limits of selection during maize domestication.

Authors:  R L Wang; A Stec; J Hey; L Lukens; J Doebley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-03-18       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  23 in total

1.  Stickbreaking: a novel fitness landscape model that harbors epistasis and is consistent with commonly observed patterns of adaptive evolution.

Authors:  Anna C Nagel; Paul Joyce; Holly A Wichman; Craig R Miller
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  Establishment of new mutations under divergence and genome hitchhiking.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Feder; Richard Gejji; Sam Yeaman; Patrik Nosil
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Beneficial mutations and the dynamics of adaptation in asexual populations.

Authors:  Paul D Sniegowski; Philip J Gerrish
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Clonal interference in large populations.

Authors:  Su-Chan Park; Joachim Krug
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Rapid increase in viability due to new beneficial mutations in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Priti Azad; Mingchai Zhang; R C Woodruff
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2009-11-02       Impact factor: 1.082

Review 6.  Factors influencing the effect size distribution of adaptive substitutions.

Authors:  Emily L Dittmar; Christopher G Oakley; Jeffrey K Conner; Billie A Gould; Douglas W Schemske
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Adaptation of Drosophila melanogaster to increased NaCl concentration due to dominant beneficial mutations.

Authors:  Mingcai Zhang; Priti Azad; R C Woodruff
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 1.082

8.  The basis of antagonistic pleiotropy in hfq mutations that have opposite effects on fitness at slow and fast growth rates.

Authors:  R Maharjan; C McKenzie; A Yeung; T Ferenci
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.821

9.  Impacts of mutation effects and population size on mutation rate in asexual populations: a simulation study.

Authors:  Xiaoqian Jiang; Baolin Mu; Zhuoran Huang; Mingjing Zhang; Xiaojuan Wang; Shiheng Tao
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  The properties of adaptive walks in evolving populations of fungus.

Authors:  Sijmen E Schoustra; Thomas Bataillon; Danna R Gifford; Rees Kassen
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 8.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.