Literature DB >> 28565154

USING HITCHHIKING GENES TO STUDY ADAPTATION AND DIVERGENCE DURING SPECIATION WITHIN THE DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER SPECIES COMPLEX.

Holly Hilton1, Richard M Kliman1, Jody Hey1.   

Abstract

Several studies of intraspecific and interspecific DNA sequence variation from Drosophila loci have revealed a pattern of low intraspecific variation from genomic regions of low recombination. The mechanisms consistently invoked to explain these patterns are the selective sweep of advantageous mutations together with genetic hitchhiking of linked loci. To examine the effect of selective sweeps on genetic divergence during speciation, we studied two loci in different genomic regions thought to be subject to selective sweeps. We obtained DNA sequences from 1.1kb pair portions of the fourth chromosome locus cubitus interruptus Dominant (ciD ) and from the asense locus near the telomere of the X chromosome. At ciD , we found very low variation among multiple lines of Drosophila mauritiana and D. sechellia. This finding is consistent with an earlier report of very low variation in D. melanogaster and D. simulans at ciD and supports the conclusion of selective sweeps and genetic hitchhiking on the nonrecombining fourth chromosome. The pattern of variation found at asense suggests that a selective sweep has occurred recently at the tip of the X chromosome in D. simulans, but not in D. melanogaster or D. mauritiana. The data from ciD and asense are compared with data from three X chromosome loci (period, zeste, and yolk protein 2) that experience normal levels of recombination. By examining estimated genealogies and the rates at which different classes of mutations have accumulated, we conclude that selective sweeps are common occurrences on the fourth chromosome but less common near the tip of the X chromosome. An interesting pattern of low variation at ciD among D. simulans, D. mauritiana, and D. sechellia suggests that a selective sweep may have occurred among these forms even after divergence into separate species had begun. © 1994 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  asense; cubitus interruptus Dominant; phylogeny; speciation

Year:  1994        PMID: 28565154     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1994.tb02222.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  12 in total

Review 1.  Evolution of genes and taxa: a primer.

Authors:  J J Doyle; B S Gaut
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.076

2.  Synonymous substitution rates in Drosophila: mitochondrial versus nuclear genes.

Authors:  E N Moriyama; J R Powell
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  A test of the background selection hypothesis based on nucleotide data from Drosophila ananassae.

Authors:  W Stephan; L Xing; D A Kirby; J M Braverman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-05-12       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Linkage limits the power of natural selection in Drosophila.

Authors:  Andrea J Betancourt; Daven C Presgraves
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-10-07       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Genetics and lineage-specific evolution of a lethal hybrid incompatibility between Drosophila mauritiana and its sibling species.

Authors:  M Victoria Cattani; Daven C Presgraves
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-02-02       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Speciation in the deep sea: multi-locus analysis of divergence and gene flow between two hybridizing species of hydrothermal vent mussels.

Authors:  Baptiste Faure; Didier Jollivet; Arnaud Tanguy; François Bonhomme; Nicolas Bierne
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Contrasting population genetic structure and gene flow between Oryza rufipogon and Oryza nivara.

Authors:  Hai-Fei Zhou; Xiao-Ming Zheng; Ruo-Xun Wei; Gerard Second; Duncan A Vaughan; Song Ge
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 5.699

8.  An approximate likelihood for genetic data under a model with recombination and population splitting.

Authors:  D Davison; J K Pritchard; G Coop
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 1.570

9.  Multiple hybridization events between Drosophila simulans and Drosophila mauritiana are supported by mtDNA introgression.

Authors:  Maria D S Nunes; Pablo Orozco-Ter Wengel; Michaela Kreissl; Christian Schlötterer
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 6.185

10.  Did glacial advances during the Pleistocene influence differently the demographic histories of benthic and pelagic Antarctic shelf fishes?--Inferences from intraspecific mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequence diversity.

Authors:  Karel Janko; Guillaume Lecointre; Arthur Devries; Arnaud Couloux; Corinne Cruaud; Craig Marshall
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2007-11-12       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.