| Literature DB >> 19649261 |
Baptiste Faure1, Didier Jollivet, Arnaud Tanguy, François Bonhomme, Nicolas Bierne.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Reconstructing the history of divergence and gene flow between closely-related organisms has long been a difficult task of evolutionary genetics. Recently, new approaches based on the coalescence theory have been developed to test the existence of gene flow during the process of divergence. The deep sea is a motivating place to apply these new approaches. Differentiation by adaptation can be driven by the heterogeneity of the hydrothermal environment while populations should not have been strongly perturbed by climatic oscillations, the main cause of geographic isolation at the surface. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDING: Samples of DNA sequences were obtained for seven nuclear loci and a mitochondrial locus in order to conduct a multi-locus analysis of divergence and gene flow between two closely related and hybridizing species of hydrothermal vent mussels, Bathymodiolus azoricus and B. puteoserpentis. The analysis revealed that (i) the two species have started to diverge approximately 0.760 million years ago, (ii) the B. azoricus population size was 2 to 5 time greater than the B. puteoserpentis and the ancestral population and (iii) gene flow between the two species occurred over the complete species range and was mainly asymmetric, at least for the chromosomal regions studied.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19649261 PMCID: PMC2715857 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006485
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Position of Mid-Atlantic Ridge hydrothermal vent fields.
Figure 2Size and constitution of the eight gene fragments studied.
Sequences of PCR primers.
| locus | 5′-[size of the tag] primer Forward -3′ | 5′-[size of the tag] Primer Reverse -3′ |
| CO1 |
|
|
| EF1α | [3bp] | [3bp] |
| SAHH | [4bp] | [4bp] |
| COL1 | [4bp] | [4bp] |
| LYSO | [4bp] | [4bp] |
| GF1A and GF1B | [4bp] | [4bp] |
| ITS2 |
|
|
Summary statistics of nucleotidic polymorphism for mitochondrial and nuclear sequences.
| locus | Species |
|
|
| θ | π | Tajima's D |
| Div. (vs. 7S) | Div. Ba/Bp | Div. Rb/MG | Rm | Фst | |
| MG | Bp | |||||||||||||
| CO1 |
| 44 | 528 | 26 | 0.0113 | 0.0058 | −1.6176 * | 0.051** | 0.1181 | 0.0611 | 0.0048 | 4 | 0.0217 | 0.94*** |
|
| 52 | 528 | 18 | 0.0075 | 0.0036 | −1.6411* | 0.050* | 0.1178 | 0.0609 | SAA | 4 | - | 0.96*** | |
|
| 33 | 528 | 3 | 0.0014 | 0.0006 | −1.3758 | 0.069* | 0.1190 | - | - | 0 | - | - | |
|
| 4 | 528 | 0 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| EF1α |
| 14 | 540 | 5 | 0.0030 | 0.0013 | −1.8893* | 0.144 | 0.0258 | 0.0019 | 0.0009 | 0 | 0.0090 | 0.08* |
|
| 18 | 540 | 2 | 0.0011 | 0.0004 | −1.5078* | 0.157 | 0.0254 | 0.0014 | SAA | 0 | - | 0.09* | |
|
| 15 | 540 | 6 | 0.0035 | 0.0021 | −1.3326 | 0.107 | 0.0251 | - | - | 0 | - | - | |
|
| 4 | 540 | 1 | 0.0010 | 0.0009 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| SAHH |
| 13 | 940 | 18 | 0.0064 | 0.0048 | −1.0545 | 0.102 | 0.0396 | 0.0134 | 0.0050 | 0 | −0.0404 | 0.56*** |
|
| 13 | 940 | 22 | 0.0079 | 0.0055 | −1.3315 | 0.083** | 0.0405 | 0.0144 | SAA | 0 | - | 0.56*** | |
|
| 11 | 940 | 26 | 0.0101 | 0.0075 | −1.1897 | 0.118 | 0.0384 | - | - | 2 | - | - | |
|
| 4 | 940 | 14 | 0.0088 | 0.0100 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| COL1 |
| 18 | 683 | 37 | 0.0162 | 0.0116 | −1.1564 | 0.082* | 0.0405 | 0.0106 | 0.0110 | 2 | −0.0160 | 0.05 |
|
| 31 | 683 | 42 | 0.0154 | 0.0109 | −1.0809 | 0.073* | 0.0407 | 0.0099 | SAA | 4 | - | 0.01 | |
|
| 24 | 683 | 32 | 0.0125 | 0.0087 | −1.1690 | 0.076* | 0.0408 | - | - | 1 | - | - | |
|
| 1 | 683 | / | / | / | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| LYSO |
| 32 | 1297 | 58 | 0.0123 | 0.0120 | −0.0418 | 0.115 | 0.0587 | 0.0141 | 0.0120 | 11 | −0.0035 | 0.20*** |
|
| 35 | 1297 | 59 | 0.0129 | 0.0124 | −0.1372 | 0.114 | 0.0581 | 0.0142 | SAA | 17 | 0.19*** | ||
|
| 25 | 1297 | 50 | 0.0111 | 0.0101 | −0.3588 | 0.115 | 0.0586 | - | - | 9 | - | - | |
|
| 4 | 1297 | 16 | 0.0071 | 0.0068 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| GF1A |
| 24 | 748 | 22 | 0.0079 | 0.0061 | −0.8371 | 0.090 | 0.0213 | 0.0072 | 0.0070 | 2 | 0.0280 | 0.03 |
|
| 20 | 748 | 25 | 0.0098 | 0.0074 | −0.9462 | 0.100 | 0.0229 | 0.0074 | SAA | 5 | - | −0.03 | |
|
| 18 | 748 | 27 | 0.0105 | 0.0079 | −1.0133 | 0.103 | 0.0228 | - | - | 5 | - | - | |
|
| 4 | 748 | 9 | 0.0066 | 0.0065 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| GF1B |
| 14 | 768 | 25 | 0.0106 | 0.0137 | 1.2203 | 0.197 | 0.0318 | 0.0152 | 0.0179 | 3 | 0.0591 | 0.02 |
|
| 13 | 768 | 39 | 0.0174 | 0.0201 | 0.6576 | 0.176 | 0.0316 | 0.0172 | SAA | 2 | - | −0.06 | |
|
| 13 | 768 | 27 | 0.0117 | 0.0161 | 1.6281* | 0.215* | 0.0300 | - | - | 3 | - | - | |
|
| 4 | 768 | 5 | 0.0036 | 0.0033 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| ITS2 |
| 14 | 413 | 6 | 0.0049 | 0.0030 | −1.3944 | 0.178 | 0.0326 | 0.0082 | 0.0042 | 0 | 0.0231 | 0.05 |
|
| 14 | 413 | 13 | 0.0107 | 0.0053 | −2.0740* | 0.139 | 0.0318 | 0.0094 | SAA | 0 | - | 0.06* | |
|
| 22 | 413 | 28 | 0.0210 | 0.0127 | −1.5021 | 0.078* | 0.0326 | - | - | 1 | - | - | |
|
| 4 | 413 | 3 | 0.0041 | 0.0042 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
Ba: Bathymodiolus azoricus (Rb: Rainbow; MG: Menez Gwen); Bp_Lg: B. puteoserpentis Logatchev; Bt_7S: B. thermophilus 7°S.
N: Number of sequences.
L: Average length (bp) of the sequences from each species.
S: Number of polymorphic sites.
θ: Estimate of 2Nfμ (mtDNA) (Nf is the effective number of females) or 4Neμ (nuclear DNA) per base pair using the number of polymorphic sites [35].
π: Estimate of 2Nfμ (mtDNA) or 4Neμ (nuclear DNA) using the average number of nucleotide difference per site [36].
Tajima's D: Tajima's statistic [37].
R: Ramos-Onsins and Rozas statistic [38]. Significativity tested by coalescent simulation (given the number of segregating sites and no recombination) (*: p<0.05; **: p<0.01).
Div.: Average number of nucleotidic substitutions per site between populations. SAA: Same As Above.
Фst: population differentiation, tested by 1000 permutations with the Arlequin software (*: p<0.05; ***: p<0.001).
Figure 3Networks inferred with the NeighborNet algorithm for the 8 loci.
In red: alleles from B. azoricus; in blue: alleles from B. puteoserpentis. Small arrows: introgressed alleles (see discussion).
Distribution of alleles.
| number of alleles per clade | proportion of alleles per clade | ||||
| “Bazori” | “Bputeo” | “Bazori” | “Bputeo” | ||
| CO1 |
| 44 | 0 | 100 | 0 |
|
| 52 | 0 | 100 | 0 | |
|
| 0 | 33 | 0 | 100 | |
| SAHH |
| 13 | 0 | 100 | 0 |
|
| 13 | 0 | 100 | 0 | |
|
| 2 | 9 | 18 | 82 | |
| LYSO |
| 24 | 8 | 75 | 25 |
|
| 25 | 10 | 71 | 29 | |
|
| 5 | 20 | 20 | 80 | |
| ITS2 |
| 10 | 4 | 71 | 29 |
|
| 12 | 2 | 86 | 14 | |
|
| 8 | 14 | 36 | 64 | |
| EF1α |
| 13 | 1 | 93 | 7 |
|
| 17 | 1 | 94 | 6 | |
|
| 9 | 6 | 60 | 40 | |
| GF1A | No differentiation and/or complex coalescence | ||||
| GF1B | |||||
| COL1 | |||||
Figure 4Difference in sequence divergence between B. azoricus and B. puteoserpentis.
Each point represent the value of absolute divergence d for the locus shown on the x-axis: d = d − (πputeo+πazo)/2 where d is the mean interspecific sequence divergence between B. azoricus and B. puteoserpentis, and (πputeo+πazo)/2 is the mean population diversity between B. azoricus and B. puteoserpentis. Under a strict isolation model consistent with the traditional phylogeny (strict divergence azoricus/puteoserpentis), the value of d is expected to be greater from zero for most loci.
Figure 5Dazori/puteo/DATL/PAC ratio for the 8 loci studied.
The horizontal line represents the average divergence between the Atlantic and the Pacific. Doted lines correspond to the standard deviation.
Figure 6Average Tajima's D values as a function of the ΦPhiST.
Figure 7The marginal posterior probability distribution for model parameters (scaled by the neutral mutation rate).
Curves are shown for the analysis with and for all B. azoricus and B. puteoserpentis (a) population size, (b) migration, (c) divergence time.
Estimates and the 90% Highest Posterior Density (HPD) Intervals of Demographic Parameters from IMa multi locus analyse.
| Comparison | θ1 | θ2 | θA | m1 | m2 | t | N1 | N2 | NA | M1 = 2N1m1 | M2 = 2N2m2 | t (years × 1000) |
|
| ||||||||||||
| Estimate | 57.936 | 10.829 | 8.224 | 0.001 | 0.792 | 0.477 | 11,497.577 | 2,149.008 | 1,632.117 | 0.01 | 4.29 | 758 |
| lower 90% HPD | 35.844 | 5.998 | 6.558 | 0.001 | 0.372 | 0.377 | 7,113.292 | 1,190.341 | 1,301.395 | 600 | ||
| higher 90% HPD | 78.225 | 16.545 | 10.326 | 0.165 | 1.827 | 0.600 | 15,523.971 | 3,283.425 | 2,049.147 | 953 |
Estimates and the 90% Highest Posterior Density (HPD) Intervals of Migration Rate Parameters, and maximum of the mean time of migration events (mtime), obtained from IMa analyses of the 8 loci.
| Locus | m1 (from | m2 (from | t | t in years ×1000 | mtime in year × 1000 (mtime/t) | ||
| m1 | m2 | ||||||
| CO1 | |||||||
| Estimate | 0.005 | 0.005 | 0.453 | 719 | - | - | |
| lower 90% HPD | 0.005 | 0.005 | 0.213 | ||||
| higher 90% HPD | 0.195 | 1.275 | 4.998 | ||||
| EF1α | |||||||
| Estimate | 0.005 | 3.535 | 0.418 | 664 | - | 433 (0.65) | |
| lower 90% HPD | 0.005 | 1.355 | 0.193 | ||||
| higher 90% HPD | 6.965 | 9.115 | 4.998 | ||||
| SAHH | |||||||
| Estimate | 0.005 | 0.185 | 0.493 | 783 | - | 351 (0.45) | |
| lower 90% HPD | 0.005 | 0.005 | 0.161 | ||||
| higher 90% HPD | 8.025 | 8.295 | 1.999 | ||||
| COL1 | |||||||
| Estimate | 0.005 | 0.465 | 1.087 | 1 726 | - | 814 (0.47) | |
| lower 90% HPD | 0.005 | 0.005 | 0.738 | ||||
| higher 90% HPD | 8.895 | 6.935 | 1.507 | ||||
| LYSO | |||||||
| Estimate | 0.185 | 0.005 | 0.317 | 503 | 210 (0.42) | - | |
| lower 90% HPD | 0.005 | 0.005 | 0.119 | ||||
| higher 90% HPD | 6.545 | 6.585 | 1.999 | ||||
| GF1A | |||||||
| Estimate | 0.007 | 14.992 | 0.787 | 1 249 | - | No peak | |
| lower 90% HPD | 0.007 | 1.987 | 0.333 | ||||
| higher 90% HPD | 14.993 | 14.993 | 1.383 | ||||
| GF1B | |||||||
| Estimate | 0.005 | 1.715 | 0.617 | 980 | - | 663 (0.68) | |
| lower 90% HPD | 0.005 | 0.005 | 0.077 | ||||
| higher 90% HPD | 8.055 | 8.245 | 4.997 | ||||
| ITS2 | |||||||
| Estimate | 0.705 | 1.785 | 1.318 | 2 092 | 1790 (0.86) | 1473 (0.7) | |
| lower 90% HPD | 0.005 | 0.575 | 0.872 | ||||
| higher 90% HPD | 7.375 | 5.265 | 4.998 | ||||
Figure 8IMa single locus probability distributions of migration rates for each of the 8 loci.
Figure 9Reconstructed genealogy of the SAHH locus for B. azoricus.
Mutations are indicated with dots.
Figure 10Ancestral recombination graph of the GF1B locus and schematic map of recombinant alleles.
Mutations are indicated with dots. Dashed lines indicate that the parental allele of the recombinant could not be precisely identified.
Figure 11Distribution of the average frequency of the variant nucleotidic sites (when compared to the outgroup B. thermophilus) in the two Atlantic species.
Stars indicate a significant excess of mutations with an intermediate frequency.