Literature DB >> 33536336

Competitive history shapes rapid evolution in a seasonal climate.

Tess Nahanni Grainger1, Seth M Rudman2,3, Paul Schmidt2, Jonathan M Levine4.   

Abstract

Eco-evolutionary dynamics will play a critical role in determining species' fates as climatic conditions change. Unfortunately, we have little understanding of how rapid evolutionary responses to climate play out when species are embedded in the competitive communities that they inhabit in nature. We tested the effects of rapid evolution in response to interspecific competition on subsequent ecological and evolutionary trajectories in a seasonally changing climate using a field-based evolution experiment with Drosophila melanogaster Populations of D. melanogaster were either exposed, or not exposed, to interspecific competition with an invasive competitor, Zaprionus indianus, over the summer. We then quantified these populations' ecological trajectories (abundances) and evolutionary trajectories (heritable phenotypic change) when exposed to a cooling fall climate. We found that competition with Z. indianus in the summer affected the subsequent evolutionary trajectory of D. melanogaster populations in the fall, after all interspecific competition had ceased. Specifically, flies with a history of interspecific competition evolved under fall conditions to be larger and have lower cold fecundity and faster development than flies without a history of interspecific competition. Surprisingly, this divergent fall evolutionary trajectory occurred in the absence of any detectible effect of the summer competitive environment on phenotypic evolution over the summer or population dynamics in the fall. This study demonstrates that competitive interactions can leave a legacy that shapes evolutionary responses to climate even after competition has ceased, and more broadly, that evolution in response to one selective pressure can fundamentally alter evolution in response to subsequent agents of selection.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drosophila melanogaster; adaptation; interspecific competition; invasive species; seasonal evolution

Year:  2021        PMID: 33536336      PMCID: PMC8017725          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2015772118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  64 in total

1.  Experimental evolution of protozoan traits in response to interspecific competition.

Authors:  C P terHorst
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 2.411

2.  Widespread parallel evolution in sticklebacks by repeated fixation of Ectodysplasin alleles.

Authors:  Pamela F Colosimo; Kim E Hosemann; Sarita Balabhadra; Guadalupe Villarreal; Mark Dickson; Jane Grimwood; Jeremy Schmutz; Richard M Myers; Dolph Schluter; David M Kingsley
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-03-25       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  The newest synthesis: understanding the interplay of evolutionary and ecological dynamics.

Authors:  Thomas W Schoener
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  EVOLUTION OF HIGHER FEEDING RATE IN DROSOPHILA DUE TO DENSITY-DEPENDENT NATURAL SELECTION.

Authors:  Amitabh Joshi; Laurence D Mueller
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  ON THE MEASUREMENT OF NATURAL AND SEXUAL SELECTION: THEORY.

Authors:  Stevan J Arnold; Michael J Wade
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Effects of rapid evolution on species coexistence.

Authors:  Simon P Hart; Martin M Turcotte; Jonathan M Levine
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Transgenerational Epigenetic Inheritance.

Authors:  Ana Bošković; Oliver J Rando
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 16.830

8.  How competition affects evolutionary rescue.

Authors:  Matthew Miles Osmond; Claire de Mazancourt
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-19       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  AN INTERACTION BETWEEN ENVIRONMENTAL TEMPERATURE AND GENETIC VARIATION FOR BODY SIZE FOR THE FITNESS OF ADULT FEMALE DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER.

Authors:  Jennie McCabe; Linda Partridge
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Coevolution of competing Callosobruchus species does not stabilize coexistence.

Authors:  Stephen J Hausch; Jeremy W Fox; Steven M Vamosi
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 2.912

View more
  3 in total

1.  Competitive history shapes rapid evolution in a seasonal climate.

Authors:  Tess Nahanni Grainger; Seth M Rudman; Paul Schmidt; Jonathan M Levine
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Frequency dependence and the predictability of evolution in a changing environment.

Authors:  Luis-Miguel Chevin; Zachariah Gompert; Patrik Nosil
Journal:  Evol Lett       Date:  2021-12-20

3.  Competition alters species' plastic and genetic response to environmental change.

Authors:  Lynn Govaert; Luis J Gilarranz; Florian Altermatt
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.