Literature DB >> 28564973

DIRECT AND CORRELATED RESPONSES TO SELECTION ON AGE AT REPRODUCTION IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER.

Linda Partridge1, Kevin Fowler1.   

Abstract

Aging may be a consequence of mutation accumulation or of negative pleiotropic correlations between performance late and earlier in the lifespan. This study used artificial selection on flies derived from two different base stocks to produce "young" and "old" lines, propagated by breeding from young and old adults respectively. Virgin and mated adults of both sexes from the "old" lines lived longer than "young" line flies. "Young" and "old" mated females did not differ in fecundity or fertility early in the lifespan, but "old" line females had higher fecundity and fertility late in life. The results therefore suggested either that the response to selection had revealed the effect of mutation accumulation, or that pleiotropy involving characters other than early fecundity must have been involved. Development time from egg to adult was longer in the "old" lines. Competition of selected line larvae from one base stock against mutant marked larvae from the same base stock revealed that, at a wide range of larval densities, "old" line larvae showed lower survival rates than "young" line larvae. Thorax length and wet weight were significantly greater in the "old" line flies from one base stock. The results may imply that the selection regime in the "old" lines favored extended growth during development to produce a more durable adult soma, despite the cost in increased larval mortality and delayed reproduction, because the potential reproductive benefits later in life were increased. However, the differences between larvae from "old" and "young" lines could also be attributable to density differences, and this possibility needs systematic investigation. © 1992 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drosophila melanogaster; mutation; pleiotropy; reproduction; selection

Year:  1992        PMID: 28564973     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1992.tb01986.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  38 in total

1.  K-selection, alpha-selection, effectiveness, and tolerance in competition: density-dependent selection revisited.

Authors:  A Joshi; N G Prasad; M Shakarad
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.166

2.  Evolution of ageing since Darwin.

Authors:  Michael R Rose; Molly K Burke; Parvin Shahrestani; Laurence D Mueller
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.166

Review 3.  Testing evolutionary models of senescence: traditional approaches and future directions.

Authors:  Chloe Robins; Karen N Conneely
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Increased Akt signaling in the fat body of Anopheles stephensi extends lifespan and increases lifetime fecundity through modulation of insulin-like peptides.

Authors:  Lewis V Hun; Shirley Luckhart; Michael A Riehle
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 2.354

5.  Metabolic rate covaries with fitness and the pace of the life history in the field.

Authors:  Amanda K Pettersen; Craig R White; Dustin J Marshall
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Enhancement of larval immune system traits as a correlated response to selection for rapid development in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Punyatirtha Dey; Kanika Mendiratta; Joy Bose; Amitabh Joshi
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.166

7.  Variation in adult life history and stress resistance across five species of Drosophila.

Authors:  N Sharmila Bharathi; N G Prasad; Mallikarjun Shakarad; Amitabh Joshi
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.166

8.  The devil in the details of life-history evolution: instability and reversal of genetic correlations during selection on Drosophila development.

Authors:  Adam K Chippindale; Anh L Ngo; Michael R Rose
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.166

Review 9.  Nutritional geometry provides food for thought.

Authors:  C Ruth Archer; Nick Royle; Sandra South; Colin Selman; John Hunt
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2009-06-05       Impact factor: 6.053

10.  Effect of a standardised dietary restriction protocol on multiple laboratory strains of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Richard C Grandison; Richard Wong; Timothy M Bass; Linda Partridge; Matthew D W Piper
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.