Literature DB >> 15133195

Variation in adult life history and stress resistance across five species of Drosophila.

N Sharmila Bharathi1, N G Prasad, Mallikarjun Shakarad, Amitabh Joshi.   

Abstract

Dry weight at eclosion, adult lifespan, lifetime fecundity, lipid and carbohydrate content at eclosion, and starvation and desiccation resistance at eclosion were assayed on a long-term laboratory population of Drosophila melanogaster, and one recently wild-caught population each of four other species of Drosophila, two from the melanogaster and two from the immigrans species group. The relationships among trait means across the five species did not conform to expectations based on correlations among these traits inferred from selection studies on D. melanogaster. In particular, the expected positive relationships between fecundity and size/lipid content, lipid content and starvation resistance, carbohydrate (glycogen) content and desiccation resistance, and the expected negative relationship between lifespan and fecundity were not observed. Most traits were strongly positively correlated between sexes across species, except for fractional lipid content and starvation resistance per microgram lipid. For most traits, there was evidence for significant sexual dimorphism but the degree of dimorphism did not vary across species except in the case of adult lifespan, starvation resistance per microgram lipid, and desiccation resistance per microgram carbohydrate. Overall, D. nasuta nasuta and D. sulfurigaster neonasuta (immigrans group) were heavier at eclosion than the melanogaster group species, and tended to have somewhat higher absolute lipid content and starvation resistance. Yet, these two immigrans group species were shorter-lived and had lower average daily fecundity than the melanogaster group species. The smallest species, D. malerkotliana (melanogaster group), had relatively high daily fecundity, intermediate lifespan and high fractional lipid content, especially in females. D. ananassae (melanogaster group) had the highest absolute and fractional carbohydrate content, but its desiccation resistance per microgram carbohydrate was the lowest among the five species. In terms of overall performance, the laboratory population of D. melanogaster was clearly superior, under laboratory conditions, to the other four species if adult lifespan, lifetime fecundity, average daily fecundity, and absolute starvation and desiccation resistance are considered. This finding is contrary to several recent reports of substantially higher adult lifespan and stress resistance in recently wild-caught flies, relative to flies maintained for a long time in discrete-generation laboratory cultures. Possible explanations for these apparent anomalies are discussed in the context of the differing selection pressures likely to be experienced by Drosophila populations in laboratory versus wild environments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 15133195     DOI: 10.1007/bf02715818

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet        ISSN: 0022-1333            Impact factor:   1.166


  29 in total

1.  Rapid loss of stress resistance in Drosophila melanogaster under adaptation to laboratory culture.

Authors:  A A Hoffmann; R Hallas; C Sinclair; L Partridge
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 2.  Desiccation and starvation resistance in Drosophila: patterns of variation at the species, population and intrapopulation levels.

Authors:  A A Hoffmann; L G Harshman
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Geographic variation in competitive ability in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  A C James; L Partridge
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  LABORATORY EVOLUTION OF POSTPONED SENESCENCE IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER.

Authors:  Michael R Rose
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Selection for increased desiccation resistance in Drosophila melanogaster: additive genetic control and correlated responses for other stresses.

Authors:  A A Hoffmann; P A Parsons
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Laboratory selection experiments using Drosophila: what do they really tell us?

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 17.712

7.  COMPLEX TRADE-OFFS AND THE EVOLUTION OF STARVATION RESISTANCE IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER.

Authors:  Adam K Chippindale; Terence J F Chu; Michael R Rose
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  RESOURCE ACQUISITION AND THE EVOLUTION OF STRESS RESISTANCE IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER.

Authors:  Adam K Chippindale; Allen G Gibbs; Mani Sheik; Kandice J Yee; Minou Djawdan; Timothy J Bradley; Michael R Rose
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Selection on stress resistance increases longevity in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  M R Rose; L N Vu; S U Park; J L Graves
Journal:  Exp Gerontol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.032

10.  The utilization of reserve substances in Drosophila during flight.

Authors:  V B WIGGLESWORTH
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1949-08       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  14 in total

1.  Immunocompetence in Drosophila: linking genetic to phenotypic variation.

Authors:  Shampa Ghosh; N Sharmila Bharathi
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.166

2.  Adaptation to larval crowding in Drosophila ananassae and Drosophila nasuta nasuta: increased larval competitive ability without increased larval feeding rate.

Authors:  Archana Nagarajan; Sharmila Bharathi Natarajan; Mohan Jayaram; Ananda Thammanna; Sudarshan Chari; Joy Bose; Shreyas V Jois; Amitabh Joshi
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.166

3.  Gut microbiota dictates the metabolic response of Drosophila to diet.

Authors:  Adam C-N Wong; Adam J Dobson; Angela E Douglas
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Faster development does not lead to correlated evolution of greater pre-adult competitive ability in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Mallikarjun Shakarad; N G Prasad; Kaustubh Gokhale; Vikram Gadagkar; M Rajamani; Amitabh Joshi
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2005-03-22       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 5.  Status of research on Drosophila ananassae at global level.

Authors:  B N Singh; J P Yadav
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.166

Review 6.  The Role of Peptide Hormones in Insect Lipid Metabolism.

Authors:  Umut Toprak
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  Correlation between body size and fecundity in fish louse Argulus bengalensis Ramakrishna, 1951 (Crustacea: Branchiura).

Authors:  Arun Guha; Gautam Aditya; Samar Kumar Saha
Journal:  J Parasit Dis       Date:  2012-07-17

Review 8.  What have two decades of laboratory life-history evolution studies on Drosophila melanogaster taught us?

Authors:  N G Prasad; Amitabh Joshi
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2003 Apr-Aug       Impact factor: 1.166

9.  Altered regulation of sleep and feeding contributes to starvation resistance in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Pavel Masek; Lauren A Reynolds; Wesley L Bollinger; Catriona Moody; Aradhana Mehta; Kazuma Murakami; Masato Yoshizawa; Allen G Gibbs; Alex C Keene
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  The effect of gonadectomy and estradiol on sensitivity to oxidative stress.

Authors:  Alex F Bokov; Daijin Ko; Arlan Richardson
Journal:  Endocr Res       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.720

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.