Literature DB >> 15133191

The devil in the details of life-history evolution: instability and reversal of genetic correlations during selection on Drosophila development.

Adam K Chippindale1, Anh L Ngo, Michael R Rose.   

Abstract

The evolutionary relationships between three major components of Darwinian fitness, development rate, growth rate and preadult survival, were estimated using a comparison of 55 distinct populations of Drosophila melanogaster variously selected for age-specific fertility, environmental-stress tolerance and accelerated development. Development rate displayed a strong net negative evolutionary correlation with weight at eclosion across all selection treatments, consistent with the existence of a size-versus-time tradeoff between these characters. However, within the data set, the magnitude of the evolutionary correlation depended upon the particular selection treatments contrasted. A previously proposed tradeoff between preadult viability and growth rate was apparent only under weak selection for juvenile fitness components. Direct selection for rapid development led to sharp reductions in both growth rates and viability. These data add to the mounting results from experimental evolution that illustrate the sensitivity of evolutionary correlations to (i) genotype-by-environment (G x E) interaction, (ii) complex functional-trait interactions, and (iii) character definition. Instability, disappearance and reversal of patterns of genetic covariation often occur over short evolutionary time frames and as the direct product of selection, rather than some stochastic process. We suggest that the functional architecture of fitness is a rapidly evolving matrix with reticulate properties, a matrix that we understand only poorly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 15133191     DOI: 10.1007/bf02715814

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet        ISSN: 0022-1333            Impact factor:   1.166


  30 in total

1.  Laboratory adaptation of life history in Drosophila.

Authors:  C M Sgrò; L Partridge
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  LABORATORY EVOLUTION OF POSTPONED SENESCENCE IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER.

Authors:  Michael R Rose
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Breakdown in correlations during laboratory evolution. II. Selection on stress resistance in Drosophila populations.

Authors:  Margaret A Archer; John P Phelan; Kelly A Beckman; Michael R Rose
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Laboratory selection experiments using Drosophila: what do they really tell us?

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  ARTIFICIAL SELECTION FOR DEVELOPMENTAL TIME IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER IN RELATION TO THE EVOLUTION OF AGING: DIRECT AND CORRELATED RESPONSES.

Authors:  Bas Zwaan; R Bijlsma; R F Hoekstra
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  THE RESPONSE TO SELECTION FOR FAST LARVAL DEVELOPMENT IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER AND ITS EFFECT ON ADULT WEIGHT: AN EXAMPLE OF A FITNESS TRADE-OFF.

Authors:  Leonard Nunney
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  COMPLEX TRADE-OFFS AND THE EVOLUTION OF STARVATION RESISTANCE IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER.

Authors:  Adam K Chippindale; Terence J F Chu; Michael R Rose
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  RESOURCE ACQUISITION AND THE EVOLUTION OF STRESS RESISTANCE IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER.

Authors:  Adam K Chippindale; Allen G Gibbs; Mani Sheik; Kandice J Yee; Minou Djawdan; Timothy J Bradley; Michael R Rose
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  MULTIPLE GENETIC MECHANISMS FOR THE EVOLUTION OF SENESCENCE IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER.

Authors:  P M Service; E W Hutchinson; M R Rose
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Selection on stress resistance increases longevity in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  M R Rose; L N Vu; S U Park; J L Graves
Journal:  Exp Gerontol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.032

View more
  10 in total

1.  Are bigger flies always better: the role of genes and environment.

Authors:  Amitabh Joshi
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.166

2.  Genetic correlations: transient truths of adaptive evolution.

Authors:  N G Prasad; Mallikarjun N Shakarad
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.166

3.  Quantitative genetics of functional characters in Drosophila melanogaster populations subjected to laboratory selection.

Authors:  Henrique Teotónio; Margarida Matos; Michael R Rose
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.166

4.  Sexual conflict and environmental change: trade-offs within and between the sexes during the evolution of desiccation resistance.

Authors:  Lucia Kwan; Stéphanie Bedhomme; N G Prasad; Adam K Chippindale
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.166

5.  Gender based disruptive selection maintains body size polymorphism in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Jaya Handa; K T Chandrashekara; Khushboo Kashyap; Geetanjali Sageena; Mallikarjun N Shakarad
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.826

6.  Variation in the relative magnitude of intraspecific and interspecific competitive effects in novel versus familiar environments in two Drosophila species.

Authors:  Amitabh Joshi
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.166

7.  Latitudinal clines in Drosophila melanogaster: body size, allozyme frequencies, inversion frequencies, and the insulin-signalling pathway.

Authors:  Gerdien De Jong; Zoltán Bochdanovits
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.166

8.  Reduced larval feeding rate is a strong evolutionary correlate of rapid development in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  M Rajamani; N Raghavendra; N G Prasad; N Archana; Amitabh Joshi; Mallikarjun Shakarad
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.508

9.  Reproductive behaviour evolves rapidly when intralocus sexual conflict is removed.

Authors:  Stéphanie Bedhomme; Nagaraj G Prasad; Pan-Pan Jiang; Adam K Chippindale
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Indirect selection of thermal tolerance during experimental evolution of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Catriona Condon; Ajjya Acharya; Gregory J Adrian; Alex M Hurliman; David Malekooti; Phivu Nguyen; Maximilian H Zelic; Michael J Angilletta
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-04-12       Impact factor: 2.912

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.